+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Small Contact Voltages - Setting Appropriate Limits

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    44
    Post Likes

    Small Contact Voltages - Setting Appropriate Limits

    When the general public receives a shock of some sort, it can quickly grab national headlines. But setting acceptable voltage and current limits isn't as easy as one might think. Here's what one electrical professional has to say on the subject. Read the thought piece.

    Anyone out there like to share their thoughts on how limits should be selected and enforced?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mixing oil and fire with a big spoon.
    Posts
    8,082
    Post Likes
    in the 1st paragragh of the article, the author states: "Excluding operators of DC electric welding equipment, no case of greater than or equal to 50V electrocution to a human is known to exist."

    this seems wrong and counter-intuitive to the article.
    "Right" is not the same as "Wise".

    Don't step on my favorite part of the Constitution just to point out your favorite part.

    Just because you can measure it, doesn't mean it is important. Just because you can't measure it, doesn't mean it isn't important.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Southeastern Pa
    Posts
    32,658
    Post Likes
    I think it's a typo.

    My thoughts:

    while there may be a time function to exposure leading to death, the first order of importance is the amount of current to which the heart muscle is exposed, which of course backfeeds into the nerve ganglia of the Vagas nerve.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gray791.png

    While higher currents can permanently damage the tissues of the body, it takes only a small current to create a confusion of contractions known as ventricular fibrillation. I doubt that any experiments have been done on live volunteers to establish the minimum current required to initiate this condition, but I recall reading that the level is supposed to be about 6 Milliamps when applied to the chest. This eliminates the hand-to-hand and hand-to-foot resistance of the body, which varies due to several factors, but which would require a higher applied voltage to achieve that current in the chest.

    So, the problem in addressing the standard issue is that the bodies of workers are not standard. Internal tissue and external surface resistances vary, which leads to a variance in the amount of voltage applied (and how it is applied) in order to determine the lethal amount of current that will be the result.

    And, applied in the prescribed manner, I'm sure that you could force a heart into fibrillation without using a full 50 volts.
    [Avatar photo from a Florida training accident. Everyone walked away.]
    2 Tim 3:16-17

    RSES CMS, HVAC Electrical Specialist
    Member, IAEI

    AOP Forum Rules:







  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mixing oil and fire with a big spoon.
    Posts
    8,082
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by timebuilder View Post
    I think it's a typo....
    i think so too. just wasn't sure. i also think that there are too many factors to determine what is a safe level. i guess we need to start somewhere.
    "Right" is not the same as "Wise".

    Don't step on my favorite part of the Constitution just to point out your favorite part.

    Just because you can measure it, doesn't mean it is important. Just because you can't measure it, doesn't mean it isn't important.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Prattville, Alabama
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Likes
    The Navy uses 30 V AC as the "cutoff" point. Up to 30 is considered safe to work on live for troubleshooting, without extra precautions. Above 30 V AC, precautions such as tieing off (for another man to pull you back), and removing all metals from your person (watch, belt buckle, etc...) are required. This was in the late 70's - early 80's. May have changed since then. I seem to recall that this number was based on the Navy's studies and beliefs, along with their experience with accidents. And a worst case scenario of an individual's conductivity, including sweating.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Southeastern Pa
    Posts
    32,658
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Nuclrchiller View Post
    The Navy uses 30 V AC as the "cutoff" point. Up to 30 is considered safe to work on live for troubleshooting, without extra precautions. Above 30 V AC, precautions such as tieing off (for another man to pull you back), and removing all metals from your person (watch, belt buckle, etc...) are required. This was in the late 70's - early 80's. May have changed since then. I seem to recall that this number was based on the Navy's studies and beliefs, along with their experience with accidents. And a worst case scenario of an individual's conductivity, including sweating.
    I think I saw that in a rate training manual in the 70's.

    Always better to be cautious!
    [Avatar photo from a Florida training accident. Everyone walked away.]
    2 Tim 3:16-17

    RSES CMS, HVAC Electrical Specialist
    Member, IAEI

    AOP Forum Rules:







  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    44
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by jayguy View Post
    in the 1st paragragh of the article, the author states: "Excluding operators of DC electric welding equipment, no case of greater than or equal to 50V electrocution to a human is known to exist."

    this seems wrong and counter-intuitive to the article.
    Well, that was definitely an item missed in the final edits of this article. Good catch!

    It was definitely a typo. I just went in and changed the word "greater" to "less".
    Mike Eby
    Editor-in-Chief, EC&M Magazine
    http://www.ecmweb.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,673
    Post Likes
    I've heard that the lowest voltage at which anyone was electrocuted in the whole history of the US Navy was 47 volts; dunno' if it was DC or AC (400 Hz?).

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •