+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: VELOCITY PRESSURE TO CFM

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes

    VELOCITY PRESSURE TO CFM

    I tested velocity pressure in a duct to find out the actual cfm for a fan coil unit, the readings of manometer(TESTO) is not stable, it does varies from .02 to .10 inches water column. Actually, it is my first test by using TESTO manometer. I depended some YouTube videos to measure the velocity pressure. My experience had solely with anemometer. Then I took the maximum value and then that’s square rout multiplied with value 4005 to get the AIR VELOCIY. Then air velocity multiplied with duct area. But final result is more than name plate value!! Somewhere mistake, any advice from you, thank you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Louisburg Kansas
    Posts
    5,824
    Post Likes
    The problem you are having is not abnormal. Your calculations are correct. You will get better results with an inclined manometer because you can mentally average the readings. The problem is lack of continuity of mass which results from the low pressure of the fan. As your readings indicate the airflow is not stable.
    I wish I had better words to explain this but don't.
    No man can be both ignorant and free.
    Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by WAYNE3298 View Post
    The problem you are having is not abnormal. Your calculations are correct. You will get better results with an inclined manometer because you can mentally average the readings. The problem is lack of continuity of mass which results from the low pressure of the fan. As your readings indicate the airflow is not stable.
    I wish I had better words to explain this but don't.
    thanks your reply,i meant the reading is not steady state, i checked in afresh air duct for testing purpose,it shows same variation. that reading is not come to steady state.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Louisburg Kansas
    Posts
    5,824
    Post Likes
    The reading is not steady state because the air flow is not steady state. Both ducts you checked are low pressure and change with building pressure. The static pressure in the duct changes also but not as much as the velocity pressure. Analog gages are easier to mentally average and give better results on low pressure systems.
    No man can be both ignorant and free.
    Thomas Jefferson

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by WAYNE3298 View Post
    The reading is not steady state because the air flow is not steady state. Both ducts you checked are low pressure and change with building pressure. The static pressure in the duct changes also but not as much as the velocity pressure. Analog gages are easier to mentally average and give better results on low pressure systems.
    your wrote here" change with building pressure". what you mean. does velocity pressure vary as per the building pressure?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Louisburg Kansas
    Posts
    5,824
    Post Likes
    Velocity pressure varies with the velocity of the air in the duct. Air velocity is determined by the pressure developed by the fan. The pressure developed by the fan is determined by the resistance of the duct due to friction. Fresh air is introduced into a building at low pressure because buildings are pressurized at around 0.05 inches of water. The fresh air duct you tested had to overcome the duct resistance and impact of airflow due to wind and opening and closing of doors as well as possible changes in exhaust fan airflow. Low pressure fans do not deliver air at a constant volume. Airflow surges and changes with slight variations in resistance. The variance in velocity pressure you are reading is telling you that but is not telling you the exact cause.
    The airflow surges are seldom noticeable except when measuring velocity pressure and the most noticeable with digital meters. The wide variance in readings you got have to be averaged to calculate airflow within an acceptable range and that is not possible to do on digital meters.
    If you use an inclined manometer and have a straight run of duct long enough to traverse the results will be much better. Record each reading and average them before calculating airflow.
    Low pressure air movement and measurement is a difficult thing to explain and one of the most misunderstood areas in HVAC. ASHRAE has a lot of information on this subject but I'm retired and no longer have a source for the information.
    No man can be both ignorant and free.
    Thomas Jefferson

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by WAYNE3298 View Post
    Velocity pressure varies with the velocity of the air in the duct. Air velocity is determined by the pressure developed by the fan. The pressure developed by the fan is determined by the resistance of the duct due to friction. Fresh air is introduced into a building at low pressure because buildings are pressurized at around 0.05 inches of water. The fresh air duct you tested had to overcome the duct resistance and impact of airflow due to wind and opening and closing of doors as well as possible changes in exhaust fan airflow. Low pressure fans do not deliver air at a constant volume. Airflow surges and changes with slight variations in resistance. The variance in velocity pressure you are reading is telling you that but is not telling you the exact cause.
    The airflow surges are seldom noticeable except when measuring velocity pressure and the most noticeable with digital meters. The wide variance in readings you got have to be averaged to calculate airflow within an acceptable range and that is not possible to do on digital meters.
    If you use an inclined manometer and have a straight run of duct long enough to traverse the results will be much better. Record each reading and average them before calculating airflow.
    Low pressure air movement and measurement is a difficult thing to explain and one of the most misunderstood areas in HVAC. ASHRAE has a lot of information on this subject but I'm retired and no longer have a source for the information.
    thank you sir, i took only the maximum value, i should have taken the avaerage value from the live readings

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Louisburg Kansas
    Posts
    5,824
    Post Likes
    You are very welcome Moideen. Low pressure air pulsates similar to compressed air produced by a reciprocal air compressor. That is how I think of it. When doing duct traverse I use the equal area method and take at least 16 readings which are then averaged.
    No man can be both ignorant and free.
    Thomas Jefferson

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by WAYNE3298 View Post
    You are very welcome Moideen. Low pressure air pulsates similar to compressed air produced by a reciprocal air compressor. That is how I think of it. When doing duct traverse I use the equal area method and take at least 16 readings which are then averaged.
    you brought good lights on this case, i was hasty when taking the readings, need patients, i had taken from 3 points only

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    277
    Post Likes
    Which testo manometer are you using?
    If it’s the 510 or 510i the resolution is not appropriate unless you are reading over 700 feet per minute velocity.
    A precision manometer may be required.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Bill Spohn
    President & CEO
    www.TruTechTools.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by TruTech-Bill View Post
    Which testo manometer are you using?
    If it’s the 510 or 510i the resolution is not appropriate unless you are reading over 700 feet per minute velocity.
    A precision manometer may be required.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    i am using testo 510. do you mean, is the analogue meter precision meter?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    277
    Post Likes

    VELOCITY PRESSURE TO CFM

    The testo 510 is not accurate enough to read pitot tube pressures unless the air speed is over 700 feet per minute.

    A precision manometer with an accuracy of +/-1 Pascal or better would work much better.
    Bill Spohn
    President & CEO
    www.TruTechTools.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    901
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by TruTech-Bill View Post
    The testo 510 is not accurate enough to read pitot tube pressures unless the air speed is over 700 feet per minute.

    A precision manometer with an accuracy of +/-1 Pascal or better would work much better.
    Which brand is good in prcision manometer

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    277
    Post Likes
    Best one is the type you use with a blower door or duct blaster.

    Search for
    DG-1000
    Or
    DM32
    On www.TruTechTools.com


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Bill Spohn
    President & CEO
    www.TruTechTools.com

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •