Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 14 to 19 of 19
  1. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    20,697
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Looks like the Ukraine is going to revisit Burisma.

  2. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    6,556
    Post Likes
    Do Republicans See the Strategy to Discredit the Barr Investigation?
    Democrats and their media friends are attempting to paint the Barr investigation, in the public mind, as a corrupt extension of a down-and-dirty Trump 2020 political campaign.
    .
    In the weekend column, I observed the media-Democrat complex’s politicized reporting of the July 25 conversation between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart:

    Trump detractors hyper-focus on the president’s request that President Zelensky provide Attorney General Barr with any information Ukraine might have about Biden twisting arms to quash an investigation involving his son’s cashing in on dad’s influence. I say “hyper-focus” because there was a lot more to it than that. Long before the conversation came around to the Biden topic, the “favor” that Trump asked for was Zelensky’s assistance in Barr’s ongoing investigation of the genesis of the Trump-Russia investigation.

    Virtually all mainstream-media reporting and Democratic commentary on the conversation now fits this pattern. It is noted that Trump, immediately after the “quid pro quo” set-up — “I would like you to do us a favor though” — invoked the attorney general, the nation’s top federal law-enforcement official. Studiously omitted is the context of this invocation: a wholly appropriate request by the president, to the head of state of a country in possession of relevant evidence, for cooperation with a legitimate investigation being conducted by our country’s Justice Department.

    Instead, the coverage skips a few hundred words. It cuts directly to Trump’s suggestion that Zelensky look into whether there was any impropriety in former vice president Biden’s having purportedly “stopped the prosecution” that might have arisen out of a Ukrainian investigation involving his son.

    The strategy here is obvious. The Democrats and their note-takers would like the public to believe that Barr’s investigation is an adjunct of the Trump 2020 campaign — and a grossly improper one at that. The misimpression they seek to create is that Barr is putting the nation’s law-enforcement powers in the service of Trump’s reelection campaign, in the absence of any public interest. The hope is that this will delegitimize not only any information that emerges from Ukraine but the whole of the Justice Department’s investigation of intelligence and law-enforcement abuses of power attendant to the 2016 election.

    I’ll repeat what I elaborated over the weekend:

    No matter how much Democrats seek to discredit that probe and the AG overseeing it, it is a legitimate investigation conducted by the United States Department of Justice, which has prosecutors assigned and grand jury subpoena power. It is examining questionable Justice Department and FBI conduct. It is considering whether irregularities rise to the level of crimes. It will be essential to Congress’s consideration of whether laws need to be enacted or modified to insulate our election campaigns from politicized use of the government’s counterintelligence and law-enforcement powers.

    The hypocrisy here is breathtaking, even by Adam Schiff standards.

    Many of us did not like the Mueller investigation. I repeatedly contended that the appointment of a special counsel was inappropriate for several reasons. The pertinent regulations require a basis for believing a crime predicating a criminal investigation or prosecution has occurred, and there was none in the case of President Trump. The regs similarly require a conflict of interest based on the predicate crime, and since there was no such predicate, there was no conflict requiring the Justice Department to appoint an outside lawyer. The FBI and Justice Department had announced that they were conducting a counterintelligence investigation; unlike a criminal investigation, counterintelligence investigations are typically not assigned to a prosecutor because intelligence collection and analysis are not intended to build courtroom prosecutions. Furthermore, the president was repeatedly told he was not under investigation (a representation the FBI and Justice Department must be held to, even though it appears not to have been true). And there was no legal basis for the FBI to open a criminal investigation of the president (as then–acting director Andrew McCabe said he did) just because the president fired the FBI director — which the president is constitutionally empowered to do at will, which did not obstruct the Russia investigation in the slightest, and which McCabe acknowledged did not obstruct the Russia investigation.

    Of course, the media-Democrat complex became apoplectic at any suggestion of impropriety in Mueller’s appointment. On pain of ostracism, its legitimacy was never to be questioned. Case closed.

    Naturally, Trump’s opponents did not want to articulate the actual, nakedly political reason for their defense of Mueller — namely, that he was the best hope for bringing down Trump’s presidency. They thus couched their defense in legal terms. The special-counsel regs make clear that the Justice Department’s failure to adhere to them is not actionable. Consequently, as long as DOJ had a plausible basis to investigate some of their subjects — such as Paul Manafort, who had committed crimes unrelated to Russian “collusion,” and George Papadopoulos, who hadn’t “colluded” but had allegedly lied to investigators — the then–acting attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, undeniably had the power to bring a special counsel in from outside the Justice Department to conduct the investigation.

    Regardless of how blatantly politicized the Mueller probe appeared to be, then, it was an official, legitimate federal investigation — one that was commissioned by the Justice Department, which lawfully resorted to the powers of the grand jury, and the obstruction of which (or lying to which) was actionable.

    Now the shoe is on the other foot.

    Trump opponents do not like Barr’s investigation of the genesis and conduct of the Russia investigation. It is, nonetheless, a proper exercise of the Justice Department’s lawful authority. Indeed, contrary to the Mueller investigation, there are no questions about the propriety of the prosecutor’s assignment. John Durham, the U.S. Attorney for Connecticut assigned by Barr, is not a special counsel brought in from outside. He is an in-house Justice Department lawyer, authorized to examine potential law violations. There is no question, moreover, that the attorney general has the authority to investigate possible malfeasance or misfeasance by the Justice Department — if nothing else, for the purpose of preventing its repetition by improving internal guidelines or even asking Congress for curative legislation.

    It is a commonplace for our government to seek assistance from foreign governments in ongoing federal investigations. In fact, Washington and Kyiv entered a mutual legal assistance treaty in 1998. In approving this U.S.–Ukraine “MLAT” in 2000, the Senate noted that the original purpose of such treaties was “to permit the United States to obtain evidence from foreign jurisdictions in a form admissible in American courts.” As chief executive, it is not at all unusual for a president to encourage another country’s assistance in Justice Department investigations.

    Contrary to the president’s public insistence, his conversation with President Zelensky was not “perfect.” It was foolish to raise questions about the Bidens.

    As I pointed out in the column, there may very well be a basis for the Justice Department to scrutinize Hunter Biden’s cashing in on his father’s political influence, under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and perhaps other federal statutes. But the president should leave it to the Justice Department to determine whether there are grounds to look into the Bidens’ activities, including in the context of the Obama administration’s dealings with Ukrainian authorities in the run-up to the 2016 election. At present, though, there is no reason to believe that when Trump spoke with Zelensky, there was any pending Justice Department investigation focused on Hunter Biden’s business transactions with foreign interests. Viewed in isolation, the president’s request for a Ukrainian inquiry that could damage a political rival appears abusive. It is not serious enough to be an impeachable offense, but it is behavior that most voters, regardless of party or ideology, are apt to find unseemly.

    Still, the Biden portion of the conversation did not happen in isolation. It had a context. It was a subordinate strand of a perfectly appropriate executive-branch request for assistance in a completely legitimate Justice Department investigation into government misconduct that is potentially serious.

    Democrats and their media friends are attempting to bleach away that context and paint the Barr investigation, in the public mind, as a corrupt extension of a down-and-dirty Trump 2020 political campaign. Republicans are not going to respond effectively unless they grasp this strategy.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/...investigation/
    Vacuum Technology:
    CRUD = Contamination Resulting in Undesirable Deposits.
    CRAPP = Contamination Resulting in Additional Partial Pressure.

    Change your vacuum pump oil now.

    Test. Testing, 1,2,3.

  3. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    6,556
    Post Likes
    Schiff wanted "compromising" information on Trump.

    Russian comedians prank phone call US representative Adam Schiff FULL HD

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3Rut64GDgA
    Vacuum Technology:
    CRUD = Contamination Resulting in Undesirable Deposits.
    CRAPP = Contamination Resulting in Additional Partial Pressure.

    Change your vacuum pump oil now.

    Test. Testing, 1,2,3.

  4. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    6,556
    Post Likes
    Judicial Watch Believes The State Dept Spied On Conservative Journalists And Trump Allies
    .
    Government watchdog group Judicial Watch last week filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the State Department. The group believes prominent conservative journalists, public figures and those with ties to President Donald Trump were being monitored by the State Department in Ukraine under the direction of ousted U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who was appointed to her post by President Barack Obama.

    "Judicial Watch has obtained information indicating Yovanovitch may have violated laws and government regulations by ordering subordinates to target certain U.S. persons using State Department resources," the watchdog group said in a press release. "Yovanovitch reportedly ordered monitoring keyed to the following search terms: Biden, Giuliani, Soros and Yovanovitch."

    Specifically, Judicial Watch believes the following people were being monitored:

    Jack Posobiec, One America News Network Host
    Donald Trump Jr., son of President Donald Trump
    Laura Ingraham, Fox News Host
    Sean Hannity, Fox News Host
    Michael McFaul, President Obama’s Ambassador to Russia
    Dan Bongino, Fox News Contributor
    Ryan Saavedra, Reporter at the Daily Wire
    Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's Personal Attorney
    Dr. Sebastian Gorka, Former Strategist for President Trump and host of Salem's "America First" Radio Program
    John Solomon, Executive Vice President at The Hill
    Lou Dobbs, Fox Business Host
    Pamela Geller, Political Commentator
    Sara Carter, Investigative Reporter and Fox News Contributor

    The FOIA includes any documents relating to the "monitoring of any U.S.-based journalist, reporter, or media commentator by any employee or office of the Department of state between January 1, 2019 and the president."

    Although the watchdog group is waiting for the State Department to return paperwork outlining this specific issue, those on the list aren't surprised at the possibility.

    "Don is aware of the report and looks forward to Judicial Watch getting to the bottom of what exactly may have happened here," a spokesman for Donald Trump Jr. told Townhall.

    For Dr. Sebastian Gorka, this appears to be the last straw. The Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign and now others in the conservative movement may be under illegal surveillance as well.

    "Not only did Obama’s CIA and FBI illegally surveil the Trump campaign and our White House, we now find out his Ukrainian ambassador had leading conservative names spied upon too," Gorka told Townhall. "The victims of Obama’s latest conspiracy are considering a group legal action action Obama and his accomplices."

    One America News Network's Jack Posobiec served in the intelligence community and knows very well that, if true, this surveillance is a direct violation of people's Constitutional rights.

    "I wish I could say I was surprised, but after everything that has come out over the past few years regarding government monitoring for political purposes, I am not. Having served in the intelligence community I am well aware of the restrictions of using national security assets on U.S. persons," Posobiec told Townhall. "These tools must not be used for partisan purposes, regardless of party affiliation."

    "If true this is a violation of the First and Fourth Amendments," Posobiec said.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethba...-trum-n2554711
    Vacuum Technology:
    CRUD = Contamination Resulting in Undesirable Deposits.
    CRAPP = Contamination Resulting in Additional Partial Pressure.

    Change your vacuum pump oil now.

    Test. Testing, 1,2,3.

  5. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lake Havasu AZ.
    Posts
    54
    Post Likes
    wanted compromising information on biden? Reminds me of the dossier, pissgate...ETC.

  6. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    6,556
    Post Likes
    Flashback: Schiff Pranked by Russians Promising Pictures of Naked Trump
    Oct 3, 2019
    .
    While I have time and before I forget it, here’s Pencil Neck — and I’ve been told that I can’t play this enough. People tell me now and then, “You need to replay that audio when Schiff gets punk’d by these two comedians from Ukraine trying to tell him that they’re the Russians with dirt on Trump.” I said, “I’ve played it five or six times.” “You can’t play it enough. People need to hear this! This is who the guy is.

    “It’s proof that he’s been colluding with Russians. He was eager to collude with Russians,” and, by the way, it’s true. Schiff made it obvious here that he was willing to collude with Russians to get dirt on Trump. Now, this goes back to April 10, 2017. Trump’s been in office three months. A couple of Russian comedians known as Vovan and Lexus called and spoke with Schiff. They pretended to be the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament, whose name is Andriy Parubiy. Here’s a portion of the call between Vovan posing as the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament and Pencil Neck…
    .
    SCHIFF: Okay. And what’s the nature of the “kompromat”?

    VOVAN: Well, there were pictures of naked Trump.

    SCHIFF: Okay. And so Putin was made aware of the availability of the — the compromising material?

    VOVAN: Yes, of course. Buzova shared those materials with Sobchak and Sobchak shares those materials with Putin because she’s goddaughter of Putin, and Putin decided to press on Trump.

    Do I need to explain this? (laughing) The first time I heard this, I said, “This is it for Schiff. He just been made a total fool of here. He’s just been made a total laughingstock.” But of course, our good friends in the media never saw fit to air this. Readers of the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN don’t even know that this happened. So here. We’ll do this again. Now that you got a flavor of it, we’ve got a fraudulent guy, a phony, a comedian from Russia — a Russian comedian — pretending to be the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament calling Schiff and the first thing he says is he’s got naked photos of Trump.
    .
    SCHIFF: Okay. And what’s the nature of the “kompromat”?

    VOVAN: Well, there were pictures of naked Trump.

    SCHIFF: Okay. And so Putin was made aware of the availability of the — the compromising material?

    VOVAN: Yes, of course. Buzova shared those materials with Sobchak and Sobchak shares those materials with Putin because she’s goddaughter of Putin, and Putin decided to press on Trump.

    So the goddaughter of Putin gets that I could not photos of Trump, gives them to Putin, and Putin decides to (impression) “press on Trump.” That means use it to blackmail Trump. (impression) “Putin has negative photos of Trump from goddaughter of Putin, Sobchak. She shares those materials of Putin now, decides to blackmail Trump, Mr. Schiff!” This is what “press on Trump” means, and so the next comedian now, this guy, Vovan, steps in and takes over.
    .
    VOVAN: [W]e also know who was a mediator between Trump and Russian government who met with ex-advisor of Trump, Mr. Flynn. It was Russian singer, very famous singer, Arkadiy Ukupnik, who met with Mr. Flynn on Brighton Beach in Brooklyn in special Russian cafe: Langeron.

    SCHIFF: What’s the name of the cafe?

    VOVAN: Uh… Uh… Langeron.

    SCHIFF: Langeron?

    VOVAN: Yes. It’s on the Brighton Beach. The most interesting thing is they used a special password before their meetings. They say it, “The weather is good on Deribasovskaya.”

    SCHIFF: “Weather… is… good” in where?

    VOVAN: “Weather is good on Deribasovskaya.” That is the name of a street in Odessa.

    SCHIFF: It’s a street in Odessa?

    VOVAN: Yes.

    SCHIFF: A-a-and the code word is “Weather is good on ‘Zerabasta’?” (sic)

    VOVAN: Deribasovskaya. Deribasovskaya.

    SCHIFF: “Deribasovskaya.” Okay, and — and I’ll have my staff call up to get spellings and more details on this.

    He totally fell for it, just a hundred percent totally fell for it. The staff called, tried to get the address, the names here. “Weather is good on Deribasovskaya.” It took Pencil Neck three times to get the name. He totally fell for it. He was willing to collude with these guys, thought Putin then had a naked photo of Trump that he was pressing Trump on.

    https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...f-naked-trump/


    Russian Comedians Prank Called Rep. Adam Schiff, Promised Him Naked Photos Of Trump
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._from_fsb.html
    Vacuum Technology:
    CRUD = Contamination Resulting in Undesirable Deposits.
    CRAPP = Contamination Resulting in Additional Partial Pressure.

    Change your vacuum pump oil now.

    Test. Testing, 1,2,3.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •