+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Infrared Camera opinions

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    80,602
    Post Likes

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On a bull named Foo Manchu
    Posts
    18,815
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by queequeg152 View Post
    lol thats amazing... the flir E4 unhacked is like 1,000 and only 80 x 60.

    the e8 is now 3 grand and has the same resolution of the new seek?

    damn flir needs some more competition i guess. either that or their sensor is way better with respect to frame rate or noise etc...idk.
    That hacking thing was a long time ago. I think they put the kibosh on it so you would need to find a used one in the age range.

    For the cheap phone plug ins the seek has a wider temperature range but the Flir has a more eye pleasing picture with the outline of the visable image over the top.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On a bull named Foo Manchu
    Posts
    18,815
    Post Likes
    Oh, the new seek isn't inexpensive. They doubled the price

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    91
    Post Likes
    CAT co sells a construction phone with IR that uses either flir parts or something..it's a pretty bad a$$ phone..but kinda dumb..cause it's also a phone that will eventually get destroyed lol

    Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •