Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 27 to 39 of 112
  1. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Atlanta GA area
    Posts
    40,250
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by HVAC_Marc View Post
    This would work with proper gearing
    IMO not really...

    We are talking a peaky high reving engine... in an application requiring strong low RPM torque....

    IMO a dumpy needs this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR9I1x2Ix-0

    That engine, is actually a 2 cycle design... only runs up to around 1800 RPM's...
    But she really sounds great doing it!
    GA-HVAC-Tech

    Your comfort, Your way, Everyday!

  2. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    77,643
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Gernby View Post
    Damn... why wouldn't the documentation specify some numbers regarding the safe operating temp ranges. If a person was designing a very well insulated building that needed to be 50 degrees inside, how would they determine that a particular unit couldn't safely achieve that temperature?
    If an area/building needed to be cooled to 50F. Then a refrigeration unit would be used instead of an A/C.
    Contractor locator map

    How-to-apply-for-Professional

    How many times must one fix something before it is fixed?

  3. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    77,643
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Gernby View Post
    Well, it wouldn't need to be that much to provide benefit. The "low hanging fruit" would be to capture enough cold water to cool the house during on-peak electric pricing (for me that is 3PM-8PM). If the chilled water wasn't quite enough to cool through the whole peak pricing period, then it could reduce the amount of cooling needed by the AC.

    If I'm only able to chill the water down to the temperature my unit is already achieving (50F), and I want to keep my house at or below 74F, then 200 gallons of water would theoretically hold 40,000 BTU's worth of cooling potential (200 * 8.33 * 24). I would not need to insulate the containers, since they will be located inside the air conditioned space. The heat transfer between the water containers and surrounding air won't really be a loss.
    200 gallons of water cooled to 50F, would only give you around 16,600 BTUs of usable cooling. Once the water reaches 60F, you won't be dehumidifying the air anymore, and the house would be very uncomfortable. 74 at a 60 degree dewpoint is an RH 61%.
    Contractor locator map

    How-to-apply-for-Professional

    How many times must one fix something before it is fixed?

  4. Likes Core_d liked this post
  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    77,643
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Gernby View Post

    My goal with the water containers is to improve the process a bit further, by chilling water instead of over-cooling my house. Unless I make a mistake, the total load on the system should be reduced by some amount.
    The system load, will actually be more. You can't cool the home and water during the off peak times for less then you can cool the home only during off peak times.

    If your system has so many short cycles. Then it sounds like it was grossly over sized. And that is what caused your high cooling bills.
    Contractor locator map

    How-to-apply-for-Professional

    How many times must one fix something before it is fixed?

  6. Likes Core_d, rcstl liked this post
  7. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Dayton Oh
    Posts
    1,663
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by beenthere View Post
    The system load, will actually be more. You can't cool the home and water during the off peak times for less then you can cool the home only during off peak times.

    If your system has so many short cycles. Then it sounds like it was grossly over sized. And that is what caused your high cooling bills
    .
    Im surprised it took 3 pages for someone to state this.

  8. Likes DOGBOY, Nuclrchiller liked this post
  9. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Billington Heights, NY
    Posts
    21,628
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by ga-hvac-tech View Post
    IMO not really...

    We are talking a peaky high reving engine... in an application requiring strong low RPM torque....
    You've never heard of a gasoline operated tractor? High revving, low horsepower, capable of yanking a house off its foundation.

    it's all in the gearing. yeah, they get crappy fuel economy, too.

  10. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by ga-hvac-tech View Post
    IMO not really...

    We are talking a peaky high reving engine... in an application requiring strong low RPM torque....

    IMO a dumpy needs this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR9I1x2Ix-0

    That engine, is actually a 2 cycle design... only runs up to around 1800 RPM's...
    But she really sounds great doing it!
    I've never considered the corvette to be peaky or high revving, since the cars I've had over the years are MUCH more peaky and high revving. However, low gearing does wonders to overcome that. My 2002 Honda S2000 had just 145 ft-lbs of torque (peak @ ~6500 RPMs) and 210 hp (peak @ ~8800), but the 4.77:1 final drive made it possible to pull my ~3500 lbs boat out of the lake.


  11. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by beenthere View Post
    If an area/building needed to be cooled to 50F. Then a refrigeration unit would be used instead of an A/C.
    Okay. I definitely agree that it's best to use the "right equipment for the job", but even then, where is the cross-over temperature that makes a refrigeration unit better than a residential central A/C unit (in terms of target temperature)? Also, if a residential central A/C unit is already in place, what would be the absolute coldest it could go, even if it isn't "optimal"?

  12. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by beenthere View Post
    200 gallons of water cooled to 50F, would only give you around 16,600 BTUs of usable cooling. Once the water reaches 60F, you won't be dehumidifying the air anymore, and the house would be very uncomfortable. 74 at a 60 degree dewpoint is an RH 61%.
    That's a good point, but I am not sure I would need to worry about humidity after cooling all the water down. It seems that the air inside my home would be ULTRA dry after going through the water cooling process. My home is very air-tight, so it seems that thoroughly dehumidifying the house in the morning should help the humidity down all day, right?

  13. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by beenthere View Post
    The system load, will actually be more. You can't cool the home and water during the off peak times for less then you can cool the home only during off peak times.

    If your system has so many short cycles. Then it sounds like it was grossly over sized. And that is what caused your high cooling bills.
    Please don't take this as argumentative, but I don't think you are looking at this from my perspective. I'm actually not trying to convince anyone here that my project will be successful. I'm just trying to get some answers about the capabilities of the equipment I have.

    It does seem that my units might be grossly over-sized, but we do have a very large temperature swing throughout the year. It gets over 100F, and humid here in the Dallas area. There's only about 2 months when I don't run my A/C, so it winds up running very inefficiently about 6 months of the year.

  14. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by beenthere View Post
    The system load, will actually be more. You can't cool the home and water during the off peak times for less then you can cool the home only during off peak times.

    If your system has so many short cycles. Then it sounds like it was grossly over sized. And that is what caused your high cooling bills.
    Duplicate post...

  15. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dover, DE
    Posts
    10,737
    Post Likes
    Your unit would have far less capacity to cool your home while chilling water. Depending on water temperature you could end up adding heat back into the home. So your unit would not necessarily be dehumidifying while chilling water.
    I havent failed. Ive just found 10,000 ways that wont work. - Thomas Edison

    Its not whether you get knocked down, its whether you get up. - Vince Lombardi

    "In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics" - Homer Simpson

    Local 486

  16. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    82
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by rider77 View Post
    Your unit would have far less capacity to cool your home while chilling water. Depending on water temperature you could end up adding heat back into the home. So your unit would not necessarily be dehumidifying while chilling water.
    The cold AC coil will remove moisture from the air, even if the air gets warmed back up by the water-to-air heat exchanger. That's a bonus IMO.

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •