-
Antonin Scalia is dead
He did not show up at a resort for a scheduled breakfast, and was found in his bed.
[Avatar photo from a Florida training accident. Everyone walked away.]
2 Tim 3:16-17
RSES CMS, HVAC Electrical Specialist
Member, IAEI
AOP Forum Rules:
-
-
Too bad he was one of the good ones. BO will try to appoint himself or maybe Jessi Jackson to replace Scalia. This won't end well.
Originally Posted by
timebuilder
He did not show up at a resort for a scheduled breakfast, and was found in his bed.
-
Originally Posted by
lytning
Too bad he was one of the good ones. BO will try to appoint himself or maybe Jessi Jackson to replace Scalia. This won't end well.
You're right, it won't end well because the one thing we can count on is establishment republicans to cave to Obama.
-
Looks like the local judge didn't break any laws as has been suggested by some online sites.
(e) A justice of the peace shall order an autopsy performed on a body if:
(1) the justice determines that an autopsy is necessary to determine or confirm the nature and cause of death;
(2) the deceased was a child younger than six years of age and the death is determined under Section 264.514, Family Code, to be unexpected or the result of abuse or neglect; or
(3) directed to do so by the district attorney, criminal district attorney, or, if there is no district or criminal district attorney, the county attorney.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.u.../htm/CR.49.htm
It he were a minor would it have been mandatory from the looks of it.
-
Some ironies here with Scalia and what the repubs are doing. Scalia was an Originalist, New Originalist and sometimes referred to as an Original Intent interpreter of the Constitution. Now forget for the meantime that either of those are nonsensical if one studies history and the framers. But with the repubs refusing to even give a hearing with almost a year left is unprecedented. Heck there weren't even public hearings until 1916. And that was probably because Brandeis was Jewish. The first to serve on the court. If you were an Originalist or believed in Original Intent it seems you would just do what was done when the framers were alive and that was just to give a vote. Nominations and votes sometimes only took days. But when hypocrites are in power of the senate this is to be expected.
-
I think we should follow the idea of Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and President Obama.
All three said no supremes should be placed during an election year.
Oh, call NPR for me. They need to correct their web page. None of the people they have tagged as "conservatives" were such. They were dixiecrats.
[Avatar photo from a Florida training accident. Everyone walked away.]
2 Tim 3:16-17
RSES CMS, HVAC Electrical Specialist
Member, IAEI
AOP Forum Rules:
-
Post Likes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
timebuilder
I think we should follow the idea of Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and President Obama.
All three said no supremes should be placed during an election year.
Oh, call NPR for me. They need to correct their web page. None of the people they have tagged as "conservatives" were such. They were dixiecrats.
First if you call yourself an originalist or an original intent Constitutional believer you would be a hypocrite.
Second I believe that in a case like this with a dem pres and a repub senate(or visa versa) that a moderate should be nominated and approved by the senate. That was just what Schumer and Biden said if you read their full statements you are referring to.
Now I disagree when they were talking about hypothetically not hearing a nomination. But they did correct themselves in their statements. And there is a difference between the hypothetical and it really happening. Their statements are nothing like the republicans are saying.
I have no idea what you are talking about with Obama or NPR. But Dixiecrats were conservative democrats from the south or a conservative group that broke off in 1948 for their own party. You may want to try to redefine the term conservative but it is already defined.
-
Obama could make a recess appointment and that appointment would stay in until the next presidents appointment is confirmed. And he could nominate anybody he wants then. Or another scenario is when the dems take the senate back this fall the senators are confirmed on 1-3-2017. Obama stays in office till 1-20-2017 then they could push through anybody they want. The last scenario would be even if Trump wins. Of course wouldn't be necessary if Hilary wins.
So this could backfire on you guys.
Go TRUMP!
A little sidenote. Thomas the other or remaining Originalist hasn't asked a question in court for 10 years. I wonder if this is why Scalia asked for Obama to appoint someone smart to the court like Kagan. This was before she was nominated.
-
LOL talk about a hypocrite ~~~ from Joe Bidens own mouth. From June 25th 1992
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_67CqebaHVk
Why am I the only naked person at this gender reveal party
-
Originally Posted by
jmac00
That is an edited, not complete version of what was said. But I know that is how you get your news and views of history.
Joe Biden, from what is not on the above clip for some reason.
“I believe that so long as the public continues to split its confidence between the branches, compromise is the responsible course both for the White House and for the Senate,” he said. “Therefore I stand by my position, Mr. President, if the President [George H.W. Bush] consults and cooperates with the Senate or moderates his selections absent consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did Justices Kennedy and Souter.”
-
Originally Posted by
pageyjim
That is an edited, not complete version of what was said. But I know that is how you get your news and views of history.
Joe Biden, from what is not on the above clip for some reason.
“I believe that so long as the public continues to split its confidence between the branches, compromise is the responsible course both for the White House and for the Senate,” he said. “Therefore I stand by my position, Mr. President, if the President [George H.W. Bush] consults and cooperates with the Senate or moderates his selections absent consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did Justices Kennedy and Souter.”
BWHAHAHAHA, typical, even with overwhelming evidence, you still are in denial
this is typical liberal threat. "Mr president, make your nomination, but if we don't like it or you don't choose the person WE WANT, for get it. but if you pick OUR GUY/GIRL, they're a shoe in"
so lets just save us all a lot of grief and wait til the next president is elected.
who knows, you might get REAL lucky and get Hitlery, Then she can possibly nominate three justices, Scalia, Ginsburg and Brayer <sp>
and YOU KNOW, at that point the republic and the bill of Rights will be a dead.
Why am I the only naked person at this gender reveal party