Results 53 to 65 of 85
Thread: Solar Assisted A/C
-
08-10-2011, 08:56 AM #53
Actually, you are the only person I've been able to find. I've been looking all over the internet for reviews or third party testing/verification=-nothing. I did find one BBB review that gave them a C. The C was due to a complaint and also because the BBB had requested info on how the system works and the company never complied. So far I would say it is looking like the others here may be right. I have sent an e-mail to the company and am going to try and phone them to see if they can provide any additional info.
An answer without a question is meaningless.
Information without understanding is useless.
You can lead a horse to water............
http://www.mohomeenergyaudits.com
-
08-10-2011, 09:15 AM #54
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Central Florida
- Posts
- 15
I had to reverse engineer some numbers out of my CurrentCost unit since I didn't have a clamp meter on the compressor, but these are my own observations of power usage with no collector.In our Miami Distribution Center our display unit a 12,000 Btu (split model) is cooling a 15x20 (300 sq feet) room with a 90° ambient outside temperature it is drawing 2.71 total running amps (the inside air temperature drawn in is 75°F and the out flow air temperature is 46°F)…a 29°F difference!
36,000 btu split
1150 sq ft house (also factor in 4 desktop computers and 2 servers running 24/7)
90-95 ambient outside
~75 at the return/thermostat
~55 at nearest register
Base power draw of the house = 1400 watts
State 1 cooling + air handler = 2800 watts ( 1400 watts / 5.8 amps estimated)
Stage 2 cooling + air handler = 3900 watts ( 2500 watts / 10.4 amps)
Again, those numbers are with the air handler and no collector. I'm working on extracting my numbers from earlier in the year when the collector was still attached.
-
08-10-2011, 09:55 AM #55
Here's a fallback position for you to consider the next time you come across something like this that on the surface seems novel and promising, but in reality is smoke and mirrors:
Ask yourself why no established OEM has already thought of it and brought it to market. Most, if not all major HVAC manufacturers certainly have the R&D capital and know-how to do so.
One might say, "They're just too conservative; only renegade innovators come out with something like this solar powered a/c."
Lennox did come out with a solar powered a/c. They just happened to leave the refrigeration circuit out of it and go with PV powering the condenser fan.
"Well, they're just playing it safe, then. Why not use the sun to do the work of the the compressor?" Because the sun in this case isn't compressing anything.
This is one reason among many why those of us in this HVAC trade really need to understand refrigeration theory. If you know your theory in all aspects (not just refrigeration) of HVAC, you'll smell a rat a mile away."In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
08-10-2011, 10:03 AM #56
Hey Shophound, I'm not completely understanding you on this. This sedna thing seems to be basically based on an absorption chiller, and the only major difference is that it is using solar heat to replace the flame heat. Can you explain what your major point is a little clearer for me? It almost seems you are saying an absorption chiller system is bogus, which I know you are not.
An answer without a question is meaningless.
Information without understanding is useless.
You can lead a horse to water............
http://www.mohomeenergyaudits.com
-
08-10-2011, 10:19 AM #57
Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Winston-Salem NC
- Posts
- 1,133
Just as as thought, what does a compressor do? It changes a low temp, low pressure gas into a high temp, high pressure gas, IIRC.
Now since the sun adds a heat source, which heats the refrigerant, and due to pressure equaling temperature in refrigerant, shouldn't enough heat from the sun cause a low temp, low pressure gas to become a high temp, high pressure gas?
The pumping part I ain't getting right now, as I can't see how the gas doesn't flow in both directions, and even a check valve wouldn't work as the hot side is always going to have more pressure than the cold side.
-
08-10-2011, 10:28 AM #58
It's not an absorption system. Absorption chillers use lithium bromide as a refrigerant. Sedna is claiming they use R407C, an HFC refrigerant with a notable temperature glide. Check out the bubble and dew points of that refrigerant vs. R-410A or R-22.
Vapor compression refrigeration, which Sedna is claiming to enhance with their solar component, depends on two points of pressure separation to function correctly. You need a metering device and a compressor. The metering device separates high pressure from low pressure. The compressor takes low pressure and makes it become high pressure. It also simultaneously maintains a barrier between low and high pressure.
If you bypass the compressor and use the solar device alone, you don't have that wall of separation the compressor provides anymore. Refrigerant heated by the sun will pressurize the entire system until some measure of equilibrium is established. True, with an indoor blower and outdoor blower running there may be some convective flow, but I'm doubtful it's of sufficient mass flow to provide adequate refrigeration.
The compressor's advantage is that it provides a fixed pumping capacity, 24/7. While it's not always pumping at nominal capacity, it is always pumping steadily. The solar device claims to do this by having its tubes surrounded by soybean oil as thermal storage. I'm doubtful. I'm not sold the solar device can even move the refrigerant in enough quantity to get the work done.
Until I see operating system pressures on one of these things in operation with just the solar device providing motion to the refrigerant (compressor off), we're missing a huge chunk of essential data to judge this thing as worthy."In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
08-10-2011, 10:34 AM #59
-
08-10-2011, 10:36 AM #60
Was anyone awake in Thermodynamics Class?
Was anyone awake though their entire Thermodynamics Class? If so; whatever you managed to retain from it is now apparently useless:
"The basic Sedna thermodynamic process is not a conventional thermodynamic cooling process based on Charles Law. Instead, it is based on evaporation, carrying heat, in the form of fast-moving (hot) molecules from one material to another material that preferentially absorbs hot molecules."
Apparently down an alternate reality hallway was the Sedna Thermodynamics Class which this guy attended.
I guess we should have all chosen our course load just A Little More Carefully, eh?
PHM
-------
PHM
When faced with the choice between proving that their opinion is correct and changing their mind to fit the evidence - most people get right to work on the proof.
-
08-10-2011, 10:45 AM #61
Yep, that line about "hot molecules" is one of the bigger loads of horse hockey I've smelled lately.
Molecular motion is not "hot" or "cold". Molecular motion itself is what temperature is measuring.
From a note I made to myself when working my way through the RSES Technical Institute Training Manual #1, Lesson 4, Gas Laws (Part 1):
"Charles' law: if the volume of a gas remains constant, the absolute pressure of a gas varies as the absolute temperature varies (change in pressure occurs at same rate as change in temp)."
Show me why Sedna is exempt from a dead scientist's law."In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
08-10-2011, 10:49 AM #62
I've invited the inventor of the system to come here and answer some of our questions, so he has his opportunity to explain. If he chooses not to do so, I will conclude this system is just a bogus situation. That's a shame, 'cause I was really liking the concept.
An answer without a question is meaningless.
Information without understanding is useless.
You can lead a horse to water............
http://www.mohomeenergyaudits.com
-
08-10-2011, 10:55 AM #63
[QUOTE=tipsrfine;10997672]I've invited the inventor of the system to come here and answer some of our questions, so he has his opportunity to explain. If he chooses not to do so, I will conclude this system is just a bogus situation. That's a shame, 'cause I was really liking the concept.[/QUOTE]
Sometimes you gotta go Vulcan on stuff like this. Try to become a bit dispassionate and analyze your way through the thing thorougly. Once you reach your conclusion you can then cancel Vulcan mode and either become the biggest advocate or debunker, based on what you find out. But becoming attached to something before thoroughly investigating it can lead you to miss crucial aspects you need to be looking out for."In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
08-10-2011, 12:21 PM #64
New and Improved!!!
Snake Oil now available in GREEN!
______________________________________________
Sign petition to limit Congressional and Senatorial terms. http://www.termlimits.org/
"We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now."--Martin Luther King Jr.
-
08-10-2011, 01:01 PM #65
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Central Florida
- Posts
- 15
(emphasis removed)
This ^^ doesn't help the thread. I know the manufacturer has been made aware of this discussion and is probably following.
I asked in my first message about pressures to fittings (which no one has responded to) and try and make sense of where things went wrong. Prior to this I had been a happy customer enjoying an electrical drop of 15% based on when I had my Goodman 13 SEER 2.5 unit.
The theory now is that the lineset under my slab has been compromised. Without a chisel, there isn't a way for me to verify this, so my next solution is to replace the system with a non-solar model and run new copper.
While I've asked the dealer to take the system back I may end up with this stuff sitting in my garage. Again, anyone in Central Florida with time to experiment to sway the vote would be great. We may even be able to get the manufacturer to sanction the tests.



