Results 27 to 39 of 89
Thread: Lifetime of 80% vs 90+% furnace
-
10-08-2005, 03:28 AM #27
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
The meaning that you need to learn more?Originally posted by madeinusa
Jultzya:
Go back and read my last sentence when I answered your post.
What meaning do you get from it?
-
10-08-2005, 03:29 AM #28
Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gone
- Posts
- 5,340
Ok, I will have to follow up tomorrow. I need to write a speech for my 2000th post.
So until tomorrow, you guys figure out if you seriously want to lose another debate with me. Remember, I am undefeated here.
Edit: You are starting to use your mind grasshopper with the "it aint going out the chimney thinking". catch you guys tomorrow.
[Edited by madeinusa on 10-08-2005 at 03:32 AM]
-
10-08-2005, 03:33 AM #29
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
Well, I don't EVER remember having a debate with you. But I'm willing to bet money that your winning streak is OVER!Originally posted by madeinusa
Ok, I will have to follow up tomorrow. I need to write a speech for my 2000th post.
So until tomorrow, you guys figure out if you seriously want to lose another debate with me. Remember, I am undefeated here.
Why are you tucking tail and running with the 2000 post Bull****?
-
10-08-2005, 03:34 AM #30
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bartlett, IL
- Posts
- 6,619
Don't lose any sleep while you're thinkin....
-
10-08-2005, 03:35 AM #31
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
So what, you now want me to believe its going down the drain?Originally posted by madeinusa
Edit: You are starting to use your mind grasshopper with the "it aint going out the chimney thinking". catch you guys tomorrow.
-
10-08-2005, 03:43 AM #32
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
Originally posted by 2hot2coolme
I really don't think you have the firepower against Jultzya.
I'm feeling a burial on this one.
Especially when you call him out!!Brown nosier!Originally posted by 2hot2coolme
And NO I'm not suckin up.....He knows his ****!!! Period!!
Thanks for the compliments.
-
10-08-2005, 03:46 AM #33
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bartlett, IL
- Posts
- 6,619
Hey, I have to admit, I did learn.........maybe.........1.........or 2.......possible things from your monkey assOriginally posted by jultzya
Originally posted by 2hot2coolme
I really don't think you have the firepower against Jultzya.
I'm feeling a burial on this one.
Especially when you call him out!!Brown nosier!Originally posted by 2hot2coolme
And NO I'm not suckin up.....He knows his ****!!! Period!!
Thanks for the compliments.
-
10-08-2005, 03:51 AM #34
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Concord, CA
- Posts
- 2,628
The legend in his own mind is attempting to invalidate energy efficiency comparisons by mixing in duct losses and the unsubstantiated assertions of the NCI lone ranger. Duct losses ARE a factor. But they don't invalidate AFUE ratings and comparisons thereof. And the lone ranger may or may not be right in some of his assertions. But I have yet to see anyone validate those assertions outside of his own little enclave.
-
10-08-2005, 03:52 AM #35
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
ROTFLMAO...Originally posted by 2hot2coolme
Hey, I have to admit, I did learn.........maybe.........1.........or 2.......possible things from your monkey ass
Can you please tell me what they were?
If not, they must not have been important and I wouldn't want it happening again!
-
10-08-2005, 04:04 AM #36
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Bartlett, IL
- Posts
- 6,619
It had somthin to do with 2stage stats & furnaces....can't put my finger on it but....I will be selling 2 stage stats with 2 stage furnaces
-
10-08-2005, 04:20 AM #37
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
Good boy!
I bet the OP is going to **** a brick if he has e-mail notification!
-
10-08-2005, 08:22 AM #38
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Central Kentucky
- Posts
- 6,235
This is because those of us in our little circle seem to be the only ones measuring actual BTU output into the building envelope.Originally posted by Irascible
But I have yet to see anyone validate those assertions outside of his own little enclave.
The manufacturers state that under certain conditions their equipment will produce a certain amount of BTU's.
The problem lies in the fact that field conditions are just a little less desirable than laboratory conditions.
Once you take a piece of equipment & install it in the field you have just introduced it to a host of variables that could never be compensated for in a lab.
Don't you think that makes the rating game just a little deceptive?
Have you set up a Google alert for Carbon Monoxide yet?
Click here to find out how.
-
10-08-2005, 08:31 AM #39
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Central Kentucky
- Posts
- 6,235
It is usually eaten up by duct losses & underfiring of gas appliances.Originally posted by jultzya
So if the 80-95% outout is not true Btus into the envolope, WHERE is it going?
The typical HVAC system is only producing 50% to 60% of it's rated capacity into the building envelope,all due to issues external to the equipment.
I believe the issue made is making with 90% vs 80% has to do with 2 stage 90% equipment in low fire,am I correct in my assumption made?Have you set up a Google alert for Carbon Monoxide yet?
Click here to find out how.
Reply With Quote
