Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 89
  1. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,927
    Originally posted by Irascible
    Originally posted by kjones
    Been doing some research/studying, and came across this nugget on my local electric company'a website:
    Which utility's website would that be? I'd be grateful for a link.
    That is the electric company speaking about gas appliances

  2. #15
    Originally posted by madeinusa
    90% will never pay for the difference over the 80%.
    10%?

    Using his figures $950 for heating cost.
    (estimating at $0.01/cf nat, $10 per MBtu)

    That would be 95 MBtu.

    95 MBtu at 80% EFF would be roughly 76 MBtu transferred into home.
    In order to get that same output with a 90% it would only take 84.5 MBtu or $845 saving him $105 per year if the price of fuel DOESN'T rise!

    $105 savings for 10 years is $1050 If you don't want the extra savings, I'll take it.

    Actual Btu output of the 95% furnace over the 80% furnace is very little.
    15% is not that much? I bet you would be apposed if the government wanted to raise your taxes by 15%!

    100 K at 95% Output 95 K ($1.00 x 95 = 95 cents)
    100 K at 80% Output 80 K ($1.00 x 80 = 80 cents)

    15 K of additional heat would be a savings of 15 cents per hour of run time ($950 - 800 = $150 per year!)

    ** All the data is estimated off of the following data... Nat, .01 cents/cf, 1000 Btu/cf. Your gas rates and content will vary (and are raising TREMENDOUSLY)

  3. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    2,635
    Originally posted by jacob perkins
    That is the electric company speaking about gas appliances
    Shazaam! All this time I thought it was the gas company talking about electric appliances. Thanks for clearing that up.

  4. #17
    Originally posted by Irascible
    But you know as well as I that 90+ furnaces throw plenty of so called technicians off. And in terms of reliability, any time you add a water circuit to an appliance you end up with more failures.
    Now lets be fair and not counter the units reliability by a (non-competent) techs stand point.

    Compare Apples vs Apples, Oranges vs Oranges.

    If the two machines were installed by the same tech, there would be no difference in the reliability of the two units.

    Like anything else if PROPERLY installed & maintained, the additional water line is damn near NEVER an issue.

  5. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    2,635
    Originally posted by jultzya
    the additional water line is damn near NEVER an issue.
    That's not my experience. But experience does not make for proven fact. So I can't say you're right or wrong with any authority. What we need is reliable statistics regarding the reliability of the two types of furnaces. I'll change my view in a heartbeat if such data shows my view to be wrong.

  6. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    5,340
    Originally posted by jultzya
    Originally posted by madeinusa
    90% will never pay for the difference over the 80%.
    10%?

    Using his figures $950 for heating cost.
    (estimating at $0.01/cf nat, $10 per MBtu)

    That would be 95 MBtu.

    95 MBtu at 80% EFF would be roughly 76 MBtu transferred into home.
    In order to get that same output with a 90% it would only take 84.5 MBtu or $845 saving him $105 per year if the price of fuel DOESN'T rise!

    $105 savings for 10 years is $1050 If you don't want the extra savings, I'll take it.

    Actual Btu output of the 95% furnace over the 80% furnace is very little.
    15% is not that much? I bet you would be apposed if the government wanted to raise your taxes by 15%!

    100 K at 95% Output 95 K ($1.00 x 95 = 95 cents)
    100 K at 80% Output 80 K ($1.00 x 80 = 80 cents)

    15 K of additional heat would be a savings of 15 cents per hour of run time ($950 - 800 = $150 per year!)

    ** All the data is estimated off of the following data... Nat, .01 cents/cf, 1000 Btu/cf. Your gas rates and content will vary (and are raising TREMENDOUSLY)
    I am sorry you went to all this trouble, but you can crumble it up and throw it away. This information is inaccurate. You do not get actual 95% or 80% output at the ducts into the home or business, and that is actual true BTU's into the envelope.

  7. #20
    Originally posted by madeinusa
    I am sorry you went to all this trouble, but you can crumble it up and throw it away. This information is inaccurate. You do not get actual 95% or 80% output at the ducts into the home or business, and that is actual true BTU's into the envelope.
    You better explain this to the people that rate the EFFICIENCIES!

    If a 95 % doesn't transfer more heat to the structure, how is the hell can it vent with PLASTIC pipe?!?!

    Because it is lowering the vent temps be transferring more heat into the structure!

    If it wasn't, it would have to be vented with metal piping like the rest of the 60-80% units!

    Have you ever looked at the rating plates? They will contradict what you stated also!

  8. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bartlett, IL
    Posts
    6,619
    You tell em damit!!

  9. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    5,340
    Boy. Sure looks like class is going to be long tonight. I wish they would pay us teachers more. We certainly deserve it, being we have to keep repeating ourselves to the clowns in the classroom.

  10. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    5,340
    Jultzya:

    Go back and read my last sentence when I answered your post.

    What meaning do you get from it?

    I am also coming up on 2000 posts. I might have to stop and write a big article or something of importance.

    Should I address the nation with a State of the Union speech?

  11. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bartlett, IL
    Posts
    6,619
    I really don't think you have the firepower against Jultzya.

    I'm feeling a burial on this one.

    Especially when you call him out!!

  12. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bartlett, IL
    Posts
    6,619
    And NO I'm not suckin up.....He knows his ****!!! Period!!

  13. #26
    Originally posted by madeinusa
    Sure looks like class is going to be long tonight. I wish they would pay us teachers more. We certainly deserve it, being we have to keep repeating ourselves to the clowns in the classroom.
    Ok, below is the last sentence.

    Originally posted by madeinusa
    You do not get actual 95% or 80% output at the ducts into the home or business, and that is actual true BTU's into the envelope.
    So if the 80-95% outout is not true Btus into the envolope, WHERE is it going?

    Cause it sure as hell isn't going out the chimney!

    If you are teaching, PLEASE retire!

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Comfortech Show Promo Image

Related Forums

Plumbing Talks | Contractor Magazine
Forums | Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine
Comfortech365 Virtual Event