Results 1 to 13 of 89
Thread: Lifetime of 80% vs 90+% furnace
-
10-07-2005, 08:31 PM #1
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Southern Michigan
- Posts
- 24
Been doing some research/studying, and came across this nugget on my local electric company'a website:
"The average 80% standard oil or gas furnace lasts 18 years. Most high efficiency 90%+ furnaces only last 12 years due to their longer run times and design characteristics."
Is this an accurate statement? I had not even considered durability as a consideration, probably because I have had the same furnace for 25 years.
KJ
-
10-07-2005, 08:37 PM #2
good 80% furnace has 20 yr heat exchanger warranty, good 90% is lifetime.
-
10-07-2005, 09:18 PM #3
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 8
wow never herd that before, hope its true though, lots of work eventually.
-
10-07-2005, 10:15 PM #4
Everything is going to wear out at one time or another. If you hardly ever use your furnace (say you live down south) it'll last 50 years, but if you live in ND, it might only be 15-20 years.
The money the 90% would save you over it's live would more than pay for it's replacement I bet.
-
10-07-2005, 11:05 PM #5
That's a new one too...
I'd say they will last the same time as long it been taken cared of.
I agree with the last poster on money saving over time.
-
10-08-2005, 12:11 AM #6
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Concord, CA
- Posts
- 2,628
I'll take you up on that bet. People move every 7 years on average. IF Mr. Jones stays there for twenty years; and if he's lucky enough to not have increased repair costs due to the 90+'s complexity; and if he uses his furnace enough then OK - I'll lose the bet. If so I'll be happy to pay off in 20 years.Originally posted by amickracing
The money the 90% would save you over it's live would more than pay for it's replacement I bet.
-
10-08-2005, 12:13 AM #7
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Concord, CA
- Posts
- 2,628
Which utility's website would that be? I'd be grateful for a link.Originally posted by kjones
Been doing some research/studying, and came across this nugget on my local electric company'a website:
-
10-08-2005, 12:49 AM #8
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Southern Michigan
- Posts
- 24
Well, this info came from a Michigan utility company(http://my.dteenergy.com/home/savings/heatingFaq.do#q1). So perhaps they have accounted for our winters here, where snowmobiles replace dirt bikes for a couple months... I'm a bit suspicious of them though - in one place they say you can save on A/C using a whole-house fan at night while in another they say you should always keep the windows shut with A/C to keep humidity controlled.
Not having any cost info available to me yet, I can't do any kind of ROI comparison of 80% amortized over 18 years vs. 90+% amortized over 12 years. But I can estimate the savings difference:
My gas cost for heating gas last year was about $950 (water heater and base charge was another $180) with my current 30 year old gas burner, and my electric jumps about $50/month for the coldest couple of months too. Shooting from the hip an 80% would save me $300 and the 90% would save me $400. So in 12 years I got $1200 saved up for that new furnace.
But in 12 years those 80-90% units will be obsoleted by something else. Maybe I should just put in that solar-powered geothermal unit right now and be done with it (how do geothermal costs compare to a 90+% gas system's?)! Only have to go down 20' around here for a well for a lawn irrigation system, anyway...
KJ
-
10-08-2005, 01:02 AM #9
Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gone
- Posts
- 5,340
90% will never pay for the difference over the 80%.
Actual Btu output of the 95% furnace over the 80% furnace is very little.
I believe there is a combustion god out here named Jim Davis who has documentation proving this fact already.
-
10-08-2005, 01:05 AM #10
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,634
you are right to be suspicious of that website. many modern single stage 90% furnaces only have one more significant part than their 80% counterparts. that part is the secondary heat exchanger. they are made of stainless steel and last forever (for the most part).
also long run times are a good thing for equipment. its the starting and stoping of the motors, and heat cycles in the heat exchanger that kill it.
-
10-08-2005, 01:50 AM #11
Grumpy Old Man
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 6,383
Adding a secondary heat exchanger and a drain wouldn't qualify as adding complexity to a unit in my book!Originally posted by Irascible
and if he's lucky enough to not have increased repair costs due to the 90+'s complexity
-
10-08-2005, 01:56 AM #12
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Concord, CA
- Posts
- 2,628
"complexity" may be the wrong word. But you know as well as I that 90+ furnaces throw plenty of so called technicians off. And in terms of reliability, any time you add a water circuit to an appliance you end up with more failures. 90+ furances certainly have their place. But it's not all roses.
-
10-08-2005, 01:58 AM #13
besides alot of utilities offer rebates for 90 percent furnaces which help offset the costs of the more expensive equipment.
geez!!! the more i learn the more i know i need to learn!!


Reply With Quote