+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Where to put the New Orleans garbage?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rapid City, SD
    Posts
    7,414
    Post Likes
    Ok, since many many (many) square miles, thousands of houses etc are all garbage. Where are people going to haul this rubble off to?

    I know it's kind of putting the cart ahead of the horse right now to be thinking of this, but I'm curious.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    9,869
    Post Likes

    We have quite a few swamps down here

    That will make great landfills.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Guayaquil, EC
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Likes
    They usually separate the vegetation debris (trees, etc), demolition material and garbage. The trees and such get piled up locally in parks and other public properties awaiting mulching. The rest goes to the regular land fills and temporary Mt. Trashmores.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,407
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by icemeister
    They usually separate the vegetation debris (trees, etc), demolition material and garbage. The trees and such get piled up locally in parks and other public properties awaiting mulching. The rest goes to the regular land fills and temporary Mt. Trashmores.
    Not always, and usually not in the near future. 10 years after Andrew there were still piles, very large piles of debris stacked up on lots right in the middle of Homestead. During Charley last year wiped out the town of Port Charlotte and Punta Gorda. After a year of rebuilding there are still piles everywhere. The landfills couldn't handle it and can take only so much at a time. They burn alot of the debris but then enviromentolists complain of the pollution the smoke produces. The wreckage will be seen there for years and years to come.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Guayaquil, EC
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by workhorse
    ...Not always, and usually not in the near future. 10 years after Andrew there were still piles, very large piles of debris stacked up on lots right in the middle of Homestead. During Charley last year wiped out the town of Port Charlotte and Punta Gorda. After a year of rebuilding there are still piles everywhere. The landfills couldn't handle it and can take only so much at a time. They burn alot of the debris but then enviromentolists complain of the pollution the smoke produces. The wreckage will be seen there for years and years to come.
    That's quite possibly due to FEMA money being cut off. That happened here last year. The city didn't want to do anything that wasn't federally subsidized.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    burlington county n.j.
    Posts
    9,881
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by amickracing
    Ok, since many many (many) square miles, thousands of houses etc are all garbage. Where are people going to haul this rubble off to?

    I know it's kind of putting the cart ahead of the horse right now to be thinking of this, but I'm curious.

    leave in place and fill in above it then rebuild. make new orleans 30' above sea level .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    11,847
    Post Likes

    leave in place and fill in above it then rebuild. make new orleans 30' above sea level .
    My thoughts, exactly.

    Psychrometrics: the very foundation of HVAC. A comfort troubleshooter's best friend.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL.
    Posts
    4,313
    Post Likes

    I don't know....

    I'm beginning to wonder if New Orleans will ever recover. Who & why would anyone want to move back? They have nothing to go back to. Might as well begin a whole new life elsewhere.
    WHY?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Guayaquil, EC
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Likes
    leave in place and fill in above it then rebuild. make new orleans 30' above sea level .
    While this is logical thinking, it doesn't address the fact that the majority of property in the city is privately owned and those owners have rights.

    The government would have to condemn the entire city and take it by eminent domain for the betterment of the city and offer it up to developers...........wait, this is starting to sound familiar.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL.
    Posts
    4,313
    Post Likes
    LOL!!
    WHY?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    burlington county n.j.
    Posts
    9,881
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by icemeister
    leave in place and fill in above it then rebuild. make new orleans 30' above sea level .
    While this is logical thinking, it doesn't address the fact that the majority of property in the city is privately owned and those owners have rights.

    The government would have to condemn the entire city and take it by eminent domain for the betterment of the city and offer it up to developers...........wait, this is starting to sound familiar.


    they could still own their property it would just be 40' higher.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    3,468
    Post Likes
    With all the money pouring in why not buy brooms and cleaning supplies and hire those outside of the superdome? You got it bud, you want money? Go back in and clean it up.


    It's dirty work but then they can begin on the rest of the city, a block at a time working with the city, state, whatever. They need work, the young and strong, man or woman, just like back in the depression. People jumped at the chance to work back then. WPA and all the rest of the projects. Many still exist today with a marker.

    So lets put these sunburnt individuals to work.

    They could make work camps rather than refugee (oops, can't call them that, it is evacuees.) sites. Why let em all sit around and compain about the rations?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,135
    Post Likes
    Why not take all that trash and use it to re-pack and rebuild the levies?


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    3,468
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by lusker
    Why not take all that trash and use it to re-pack and rebuild the levies?


    You can't stuff human beings into a levy, they won't stay that long, they will float.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,135
    Post Likes
    That...


    was not even funny... shame on you.


  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Burleson, Texas
    Posts
    1,741
    Post Likes
    At the price of lumber, could they recycle some of it?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    3,468
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by lusker
    That...


    was not even funny... shame on you.


    Care to change your mind?:

    Violence boiled over when 14 contractors on their way to help plug the breech in the 17th Street Canal came under fire as they traveled across a bridge under police escort, said John Hall, a spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers. Police shot at eight people carrying guns, killing five or six, Deputy Police Chief W.J. Riley said. None of the contractors was injured, authorities said


    There are 5 or 6 that could be used to 'fill' the dike if you could weigh them down or something. Other trash will surface soon.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,157
    Post Likes
    RUBBISH

    No is already below sea level: they can use the debris to build the city above sea level

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    4,979
    Post Likes
    I agree with filling it in but by the time they get done with it and rebuilt, it will have probably been cheaper to fill it in with money and build on top of it. Im not talking nickles and dimes, were talking large bills. Just watch the curuption come out of the woodwork filling their pockets. Now to think of it you better get Jimmy Carter out there building a new city so he can brag about it to other countries when he is there trashing the USA.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,135
    Post Likes
    Originally posted by MikeJ
    Originally posted by lusker
    That...


    was not even funny... shame on you.


    Care to change your mind?:


    There are 5 or 6 that could be used to 'fill' the dike if you could weigh them down or something. Other trash will surface soon.


    Yeah..I know Mike.. I am on top of the news and I can only cry for the poor ba$tards... but it doesn't change my mind about plugging the hole with dead bodies, well may be a few crack heads wouldn't hurt but the thing is... they would only decay and cause more trouble later.

    I say plant them in the back yard of FEMA.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •