Results 14 to 26 of 27
Thread: How much nitrogen is too much?
-
08-28-2005, 06:54 PM #14
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- South Dakota
- Posts
- 6,579
If you were to over pressurize a system 90% of the time it would be the low pressure control bellows that would blow first. Or, the bellows would be damaged to the point that it would no longer operate correctly.
-
08-28-2005, 06:58 PM #15
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 475
Leak test w/ vacuum pump and micron gauge.
Find the leak w/ nitrogen.
With the right tools, 100-150 PSI is plenty.
-
08-28-2005, 07:28 PM #16How come we don’t have more coils burst then?Originally posted by lmtd
No, not thinking incorrectly at all. It is CLEARLY stated in my post the ASTM maximum WORKING pressures and I fully understand the difference and there was a time I could quote the multipliar used to develop it from the burst pressure of the weakest component, but that was a few years ago when ASME and FM codes were on the cuff.Originally posted by NormChris
Those of you who are thinking that the maximum test pressures listed on the unit are somehow related to some burst pressures of the coils and piping are thinking incorrectly.
The expansion rate and smaller molecule are key to leak testing with nitro and IMHO and training of others, I state that section above 120 psig is labeled "retard" for a reason and that reason is that only retards test above it.
I have been in several buildings where the temperature was well over 110 degrees (R-22 is at 226 PSI) and the system to include the coils had equalized. I have never had a coil burst due to over pressure. The reason for using less nitrogen pressure than R-22 is nitrogen is seven times less dense than R-22 so it leaks “easier”. The retard section on a manifold gage is there simply to protect the gage not equipment.
Quote
“Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own." Scott Adams
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
-
08-28-2005, 08:00 PM #17
I was taught that the reason you didn't pressurize a system with over 100-125psig was the possibility of bending or breaking the suction valves in the recips. I also want to see the drop, so I never let it go off of my low side scale. The 5psig increments on the high side don’t cut it for really small leaks. IMHO
Sometimes when I consider what tremendous consequences come from little things, I am tempted to think there are no little things!
-
08-28-2005, 08:23 PM #18How? if the entire system is at a uniform pressure then there should be no pressure diffrental across the valves.Originally posted by sparks
I was taught that the reason you didn't pressurize a system with over 100-125psig was the possibility of bending or breaking the suction valves in the recips. I also want to see the drop, so I never let it go off of my low side scale. The 5psig increments on the high side don’t cut it for really small leaks. IMHO
Even if there is think of the diffrence between suction pressure and discharge.Quote
“Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own." Scott Adams
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
-
08-28-2005, 08:45 PM #19The high (say300psig) pressure initially entering the suction side would hold open possibly breaking or bending it. The discharge valve is made to handle those pressures, but not the suction side. Ever seen them, they are made differently, lighter steel and springs.Originally posted by hvacbear
How? if the entire system is at a uniform pressure then there should be no pressure diffrental across the valves.Originally posted by sparks
I was taught that the reason you didn't pressurize a system with over 100-125psig was the possibility of bending or breaking the suction valves in the recips. I also want to see the drop, so I never let it go off of my low side scale. The 5psig increments on the high side don’t cut it for really small leaks. IMHO
Even if there is think of the diffrence between suction pressure and discharge.
[Edited by sparks on 08-28-2005 at 09:19 PM]Sometimes when I consider what tremendous consequences come from little things, I am tempted to think there are no little things!
-
08-28-2005, 09:07 PM #20
I’m, not trying to be a smart-ass, just trying to illustrate my point.
Sometimes when I consider what tremendous consequences come from little things, I am tempted to think there are no little things!
-
08-28-2005, 09:53 PM #21
True but if the pressure is equal on both sides how could it hurt? I charge nitro hi and lo side and no problems. I usually use 100-150 psi but 350 hasn’t hurt so far.
Also for those of you with reservations about flare fittings. A properly made flare fitting can hold much more pressure than encountered in most HVAC systems. I replace them too because of leaks but they have their place.
Quote
“Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own." Scott Adams
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
-
08-29-2005, 03:27 PM #22Well, I guess I just have my own quirks then, but I also don't add nitrogen on both sides with all of the components in the loop.Originally posted by hvacbear
I charge nitro hi and lo side and no problems. I usually use 100-150 psi but 350 hasn’t hurt so far.
I always add on the high side, my reason behind this is because I want to see the gas going through the system. This way I know there are no restrictions (bad powerhead, blocked screen or flow-rater, check valve on a heat pump).
What ever works for you is fine, as long as the end result is the same right.
Sometimes when I consider what tremendous consequences come from little things, I am tempted to think there are no little things!
-
08-29-2005, 04:18 PM #23
I guess so.
Quote
“Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily available, they will create their own." Scott Adams
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
-
08-29-2005, 05:45 PM #24
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 18
Good Point !
Thank's for the input,I use 100 most of the time but when
I can't find a leak increase pressure 200PSi and create one.
good point!
we can alway's learn something new if we have the right
aditude.
-
01-29-2006, 07:40 PM #25
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 1
Never go over 150 psig. The danger is blowing the fustite on the compressor.
-
01-29-2006, 08:04 PM #26
Professional Member - bad email address
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Orange County Calif
- Posts
- 128
I go to about 140-150 psi and if i cant find a leak at that pressure i wouldnt think one is there....
Just my openion


Reply With Quote