+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: FX10

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,456
    Post Likes
    s2sam,

    I'm sure that everything you have said is true. There is a huge install base for N2 and making people rip our perfectly good controllers on a massive scale is not in anyone's best interest.

    But from where I'm standing that simply means that N2 gateways will be around for a very long time. I'm not sure brand-new N2 controllers will be.

    But it's all just a hunch right now.

    -B

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Mount Airy, MD
    Posts
    7,302
    Post Likes
    All these warm and fuzzies and yet you are continuing down this road.....

    Good luck and God bless ya

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    78
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    CCIKelly, I have an FX20 in the building right now, with an FX07 on N2 doing some small tower work. (I plan to get started with that) I will certainly have to add numerous additional FX20/60/70 devices to handle the 580 heat pumps that this project will eventually have, just to handle the address count. I expect point count to be about 10 per heat pump, so I will be at about 6000 points when done. 9 floors w/ 1 trunk per floor = 4 to 5 FX60s when complete, carrying about 1200 points each. That is if there is 10 per unit, and the points wont do much. Mass, but staggered s/s routines, temperature status and alarm monitoring, some mass setpoint changes. We will certainly need FXServer by the end. See any big problems with this plan? Anyone?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Mount Airy, MD
    Posts
    7,302
    Post Likes
    You have "A"single device that costs squat tied into a JACE that could not even think about taking on an additional 580 nodes and yet???

    Why??

    Why not re-think this knowing what you know now?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    78
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    I am open to suggestions. I am not the king of this stuff but I need to be in the face of my customer. That is why I am on here looking to learn and chat with the folks who have taken the butt-kickins. How would you approach this project? The only constant at this time is FX supervisory.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Mount Airy, MD
    Posts
    7,302
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by prostock View Post
    I am open to suggestions. I am not the king of this stuff but I need to be in the face of my customer. That is why I am on here looking to learn and chat with the folks who have taken the butt-kickins. How would you approach this project? The only constant at this time is FX supervisory.
    Why not tell them the truth about it and go from there???

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, AB Canada
    Posts
    1,124
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by BACnet View Post
    s2sam,

    I'm sure that everything you have said is true. There is a huge install base for N2 and making people rip our perfectly good controllers on a massive scale is not in anyone's best interest.

    But from where I'm standing that simply means that N2 gateways will be around for a very long time. I'm not sure brand-new N2 controllers will be.

    But it's all just a hunch right now.

    -B
    Good day BACNet,

    Indeed, I suspect that there will not be a company or companies making a complete product line that is strictly N2 based. However, N2 and MS/TP share the same electrical interface (RS485) and so it is rather trivial to have the same hardware that has different firmware versions to support MS/TP, N2, etc... As an example, virtually all of our newer hardware has RS485, Ethernet, gobs of power/RAM/Flash, and is field re-programmable (so the user can change from one protocol to another in the field)... consequently we can support N2, BACNet MS/TP, BACNet I/P, TCP/IP, Modbus, etc... If we can do it, and we are a small company, a number of other companies that are significantly larger than us can as well. Whether or not they want to is another issue altogether...

    Cheers,

    Sam

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, AB Canada
    Posts
    1,124
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by prostock View Post
    I am open to suggestions. I am not the king of this stuff but I need to be in the face of my customer. That is why I am on here looking to learn and chat with the folks who have taken the butt-kickins. How would you approach this project? The only constant at this time is FX supervisory.
    Good day Prostock,

    Like I said in an earlier post, I know of a couple of reasonably sized FX-07 projects (connected to FX-60, etc) that are somewhat on hold for the various people to decide what to do given the FX-07, etc notice of discontinuance. I know in one case there was an issue in being able to find 30 or 40 FX-07s for one portion of the project... some were eventually found, but what will supply be like in 4-6 months from now? Hard to say, as it is anyone's guess. All I know is that I am glad that I am not the one making the decision... Sorry, I cannot be more help!

    Cheers,

    Sam

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    78
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    This job is FX10 OEM style boards factory programmed supplied in water water source heat pumps. It is the FX10 that is in question. All I would do is map them up and do some S/S and setpoint control. Currently N2 is winning the conversation.

    I would not think of using the other FX controllers due for discontinuation to layout this job. I am inquiring of the life of the FX10 to the JCI rep and will see from there.

    Thanks.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •