Results 14 to 15 of 15
03-09-2011, 06:34 PM #14Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
There is a hope that justice will be served, without inocent people being sent to jail and for that everyone needs to have an open mind and study the facts carefully. I served on a jury last summer, I took it very seriously and did the best my little mind could. A few times during the trial I started to form an opinion and then I stopped myself and thought wait until all the evidence has been put forward. And thats all I ask of anyone.
Why are you calling them pedophiles?
They may be homosexuals ... oh, thats right we are not allowed to say that ... sorry.
Well I need a nap so ... see ya.
."Nothing else can poison our culture, corrupt our society or ruin the character of our people like unearned money or unearned opportunity." -- James R. Cook
"Fooling around with alternating current is just a waste of time. Nobody will use it, ever." Thomas Edison, 1889.
03-10-2011, 12:14 AM #15
As far as I am concerned, too many times, psychologists are worst then criminals with the way they manipulate troubled persons and especially children to think and relate to things. But that is a story for another time. the here and now is that the RCC has been harboring and protecting sexual deviants of all sorts for centuries and it has got to stop.
The reason for using the term pediphile is because children were involved. Male pediphiles who abuse male children are not necessarily homosexuals otherwise. One of the real problems with the RCC attracting sexual deviants is the damnable rules about priests not being able to have relations with women. When man goes against God's Created nature of man, things cannot go very Godly. Paul chose to be celebate, it was not a rule for him to be. Paul was also a gimpy, opinionted guy who was not well spoken, so it is not a real stretch for him to not be interested in woman.Government is a disease......masquerading as its own cureEcclesiastes 10:2 NIV