Results 27 to 39 of 93
-
02-24-2011, 12:52 PM #27
Being queer is indefensible....it is unnatural and wrong. There is no way on Earth to justify being queer. It is a mutation or flaw in the genetic code propagated by those with poor gene pools that needs to be eradicated and not nurtured.
Absolutely no good can come from this in the broad scheme of things."If anybody can draw on the power, where do we put the meter?" - JP Morgan before pulling Tesla funding
-
02-24-2011, 01:12 PM #28
Removed by Admin- No Return
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,459
-
02-24-2011, 01:54 PM #29
Yeah I missed the point, I just can't see the homosexuals I know saying that child molestation is ok.
I think homosexuality has been around forever, the fact that we're forced to publicly deal with it now can't be a bad thing. Bad preists are an example of what happens when it's something to be kept a secret, It doesn't go away.
-
02-24-2011, 02:04 PM #30
Removed by Admin- No Return
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,459
-
02-24-2011, 02:04 PM #31
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Albuquerque NM
- Posts
- 2,443
-
02-24-2011, 02:18 PM #32
Removed by Admin- No Return
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,459
That's probably true to some extent.
But lets get back to the initial statement:
Consider this- Muslims accept child rape as part of a healthy lifestyle. Catholics (the priests anyway) are also pro-child molestation. Yet both of these groups are completely anti-queer.OK, let's say we do a random survey of two groups, heterosexual people and homosexual people. We'll find out what percentage of each group thinks sex between an adult and a minor is wrong
I have a feeling that the gays are probably less likely to condone child rape when you compare them against groups of people who are either Catholic or Muslim...
-
02-24-2011, 02:34 PM #33
Is it? I suggest it is neither a federal nor local government matter. A marriage license is nothing more than a source of income for the State. It should be left to the Churches. If the gay's want to go and start their own United Church of the Queer Society that will marry them than so be it. My problem is that marriage is defined as between a man and a woman in every religion and society throughout history....at least as far as I know. I don't care if they get all the "equal rights" under a civil union. They will be judged by God, not me. They want to be "Married" because it is an attack against organized religion, a slap in the face if you will....IMO.
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what will never be. (Thomas Jefferson 1816)
-
02-24-2011, 02:41 PM #34“I am glad that I paid so little attention to good advice; had I abided by it I might have been saved from some of my most valuable mistakes.” - Edna St. Vincent Millay
The critic is a prisoner to his own experiences and perspectives, erroneously believing his limited experiences are the sum of all truth.
No Guns…No Freedom…Know Guns…Know Freedom.
-
02-24-2011, 02:42 PM #35
Fair enough, I try hard to not form opinions about people unless I know enough of them. I'm related to or friends with under twenty of them so I guess that's not enough to form an honest opinion, and the real flamers don't like me cause I'm a big mouth so I guess my experience is biased.
A friend of mine on FB said what Obama did is unconstitutional, is that the federal vs state power struggle that others mentioned earlier?
-
02-24-2011, 02:48 PM #36
-
02-24-2011, 04:00 PM #37
Marriage carries certain legal rights and also perks like tax breaks and beneficiary benefits. So yes, as long as those things exist, the state has to have domain over it. A good argument could be made that some of these benefits and/or perks afforded to marriage are good for the society.
-
02-24-2011, 04:09 PM #38
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Albuquerque NM
- Posts
- 2,443
-
02-24-2011, 04:35 PM #39
The high divorce rate is mainly a social problem. People get married for the wrong reasons, and today's people want a disposable society. This definitely decreases the benefits of the institution of marriage, but the problem could be partially remedied.
NAMBLA is a bunch of sickos that should be castrated.


Reply With Quote

