Results 14 to 20 of 20
Thread: Need help with math problem
-
01-19-2005, 08:02 PM #14
Thanks again Andy. I got it now. The reason for my questions was that I was trying to figure out how the different ductulator formulas work so I could use my scientific calculator to do them, or plug them into an Excel spreadsheet application. Somebody else here was asking about the formulas a while back, but nobody knew them. I found a formula that calculates the pressure drop per 100' when the cfm and duct diameter are known:
pd = (.109136 x CFM^1.9)/dia^5.02
But I wanted to know how to find the diameter when CFM and pd are known. With your help, I've got it now. My $8.99 Casio scientific calculator won't allow me to use a decimal point in a fractional exponent, so I couldn't do ^1/5.02. So I just changed it from a fraction to a decimal equivalent of .1992
dia = (.109136 x CFM^1.9/pd)^.1992
-
01-19-2005, 08:34 PM #15
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- Waco, Texas, USA
- Posts
- 6,153
I guarantee you this will seperate the Dems from the Repubs right quick. We will always have the thinkers vs. the doers.
"And remember my sentimental friend......that a heart is not judged by how much you love, but by how much you are loved by others" - Wizard of Oz.
-
01-19-2005, 09:55 PM #16You've got the idea.Originally posted by midhvac
But I wanted to know how to find the diameter when CFM and pd are known. With your help, I've got it now. My $8.99 Casio scientific calculator won't allow me to use a decimal point in a fractional exponent, so I couldn't do ^1/5.02. So I just changed it from a fraction to a decimal equivalent of .1992
dia = (.109136 x CFM^1.9/pd)^.1992

If I'm reading your equation correctly (I really should look it up), you can get precise answers doing the following on your Casio:
calculate A:
A = CFM^1.9
next B:
B = .109136 x A /pd
next C:
C = LN(B) this is the natural log of B (I'm assuming the Casio has log functions)
next D:
D = C / 5.02
finally E:
E = exp(D) this is the e^x function which is inverse to the natural log
-
01-19-2005, 10:01 PM #17And only the best pocket protectors...Originally posted by glennwith2ns
Yea , bet they got pocket protectors too>)Originally posted by mattm
You big bunch of math nerds.
We're still trying to figure out where to put that Parker name on them...
-
01-19-2005, 11:34 PM #18Do me a favor-------------DON'T put it on there.Originally posted by Andy Schoen
And only the best pocket protectors...Originally posted by glennwith2ns
Yea , bet they got pocket protectors too>)Originally posted by mattm
You big bunch of math nerds.
We're still trying to figure out where to put that Parker name on them...
-
01-19-2005, 11:35 PM #19Are you lost again, buttcheek?Originally posted by Steve Wiggins
I guarantee you this will seperate the Dems from the Repubs right quick. We will always have the thinkers vs. the doers.
-
01-19-2005, 11:37 PM #20It's not hard. Actually, to accomplish what Mid wants to accomplish, you spend fifty bucks on a ductulator that does this FOR you...Originally posted by ac rookie
I think I am going into another field. I will never figure this stuff out!!!


Reply With Quote