Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,799

    Judge's nude photos

    So how squeaky clean do our elected officials, and in this case judge, need to be? The judge has stepped down for now due to a $67 million lawsuit by a man who her husband tried to get to sleep with her (Mind you that was years ago when the judge was still a lawyer.)

    Is she fit to hold court (legally) or should only those with clean pasts (and no naked pictures) be allowed to reside on the bench?

    Manitoba judge steps down after nude photo complaint

    http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...000/story.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,799
    Would it spice things up a bit to know the pictures had a bondage bent?

    What a tough crowd.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    717
    Don't forget she was in family court. And yes she should be kicked out and barred from the legal system. Both of them $%^&ed up and are now wanting the rest of us to just forget that anything has happened.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Kaufman county, Texas
    Posts
    8,344
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeferman View Post
    Don't forget she was in family court. And yes she should be kicked out and barred from the legal system. Both of them $%^&ed up and are now wanting the rest of us to just forget that anything has happened.
    I don't think I am able to form an opinion without seeing some of those photos.
    I draw all my schematics in crayon now. If they cannot always be correct, they can at least be colorful.

    Service calls submitted after 3PM will be posted the next business day.

    I give free estimates [Wild Ass Guesses] over the phone.

    I am not in business to make money from other people so that I can afford to work for you for free.

    If the fall is over, mmmm let's say, 6 feet or so,.. I do not 'bounce' very well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    1,700
    them white women will succumb to black male.
    "When the people find they can vote themselves money,that will herald the end of the republic" - Benjamin Franklin

    "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force;like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action"- George Washington

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeferman View Post
    Don't forget she was in family court. And yes she should be kicked out and barred from the legal system. Both of them $%^&ed up and are now wanting the rest of us to just forget that anything has happened.
    But what did they do that makes her unfit as a judge? From all accounts (lawyers of all stripes) she has performed her duties as a judge with no complaints. She is well versed in the law and has not come out with any controversial judgments as some other judges have.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    6,270
    The Judge did nothing wrong according to the areticle, she did have the photo's taken; big deal.

    The husband is or was the one with the problem.

    The guy sueing seems to be the only one breaking a law by trying to extort money and not living up to the tenets of the original agreement.

    Chapman should be jailed and have to pay back the $25,000 plus penalties.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    cincinnati ohio
    Posts
    2,020

    bondage

    Quote Originally Posted by Tool-Slinger View Post
    I don't think I am able to form an opinion without seeing some of those photos.
    My avatar is a picture of a Goodman Silencer .....These were commonly used in Goodman country ....Photos by hvac tech ( PaysonHVAC )

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Rochester, NY, USA
    Posts
    12,642
    Quote Originally Posted by classical View Post
    The Judge did nothing wrong according to the areticle, she did have the photo's taken; big deal.

    The husband is or was the one with the problem.

    The guy sueing seems to be the only one breaking a law by trying to extort money and not living up to the tenets of the original agreement.

    Chapman should be jailed and have to pay back the $25,000 plus penalties.
    I agree completely:

    The matter was resolved quickly and privately when King agreed to pay Chapman $25,000 in exchange for signing an agreement that he would not take any legal action, would never speak publicly about the issue and would turn over and destroy all photos he had of Douglas. There was no suggestion King's comments somehow affected how Chapman's divorce case was handled.
    I think Mr Chapman is in for a world of (financial) hurt.
    GOVERNMENT

    The only parasite dumb enough to kill it's host

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •