Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Judge's nude photos
09-06-2010, 02:13 PM #1
Judge's nude photos
So how squeaky clean do our elected officials, and in this case judge, need to be? The judge has stepped down for now due to a $67 million lawsuit by a man who her husband tried to get to sleep with her (Mind you that was years ago when the judge was still a lawyer.)
Is she fit to hold court (legally) or should only those with clean pasts (and no naked pictures) be allowed to reside on the bench?
Manitoba judge steps down after nude photo complaint
09-06-2010, 10:02 PM #2
Would it spice things up a bit to know the pictures had a bondage bent?
What a tough crowd.
09-06-2010, 10:14 PM #3Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
Don't forget she was in family court. And yes she should be kicked out and barred from the legal system. Both of them $%^&ed up and are now wanting the rest of us to just forget that anything has happened.
09-07-2010, 02:59 AM #4I draw all my schematics in crayon now. If they cannot always be correct, they can at least be colorful.
Service calls submitted after 3PM will be posted the next business day.
I give free estimates [Wild Ass Guesses] over the phone.
I am not in business to make money from other people so that I can afford to work for you for free.
If the fall is over, mmmm let's say, 6 feet or so,.. I do not 'bounce' very well.
09-08-2010, 01:39 AM #5
them white women will succumb to black male."When the people find they can vote themselves money,that will herald the end of the republic" - Benjamin Franklin
"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force;like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action"- George Washington
09-08-2010, 08:17 PM #6
09-09-2010, 06:43 AM #7
The Judge did nothing wrong according to the areticle, she did have the photo's taken; big deal.
The husband is or was the one with the problem.
The guy sueing seems to be the only one breaking a law by trying to extort money and not living up to the tenets of the original agreement.
Chapman should be jailed and have to pay back the $25,000 plus penalties.
09-09-2010, 06:56 AM #8
09-09-2010, 07:08 AM #9
The matter was resolved quickly and privately when King agreed to pay Chapman $25,000 in exchange for signing an agreement that he would not take any legal action, would never speak publicly about the issue and would turn over and destroy all photos he had of Douglas. There was no suggestion King's comments somehow affected how Chapman's divorce case was handled..No law ever prevented a crime.