Results 1 to 13 of 19
-
07-01-2010, 02:57 PM #1
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 155
Is is common to upsize evaporator coils?
Is it common to upsize evaporator coils? Using 3.5 ton inside coil with a 3 ton outside coil?
It was claimed this increased the efficiency. If so, why don't they come that way to begin with?
Do those combinations of an upsized evaporator coil affect SEER and EER, and show up in lists of approved tax-credit eligible equipment?
-
07-01-2010, 03:00 PM #2
yes
i don't know
yes, yes
-
07-01-2010, 03:48 PM #3
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Albuquerque NM
- Posts
- 2,445
If you look in the AHRI database, you will see that there are often multiple inside coils that will work with a particular outside unit. Some of these don't have the exact same size (I've seen both bigger and smaller), and some of these combos actually pull higher ratings. It's the certification that matters.
-
07-01-2010, 04:12 PM #4
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 550
They don't come that way to begin with because it depends on location and equipment. Larger coils produce better efficiencies for sensible cooling loads. Smaller coils provide better latent cooling. If you live in a very humid area, you might need the smaller coil to provide comfortable cooling.
-
07-01-2010, 05:02 PM #5
Technically. An indoor coil doesn't really have a BTU rating.
The BTU rating is a hold over from the old days. Carrier on many of its air handlers. Doesn't use a BTU rating. just a number, like 3, or 4. And both coils may be matched to 2 ton unit.
-
07-01-2010, 05:47 PM #6
QFT. This is very nuanced with different coil-air handler/furnace-condensor combination coming out differently. Having looked at probably 100s, there isn't a clear rule of thumb that I can discern. It is very product specific.
Also note, heating and cooling are different. A combination that offers superior cooling may not offer superior heating.
-
07-01-2010, 05:51 PM #7
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
-
07-01-2010, 08:32 PM #8
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 115
but was he correct?
-
07-02-2010, 11:49 AM #9
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 155
Thanks for the replies.
I now understand that an oversized evaporator coil is not necessarily bad, and tends to improve sensible cooling at the expense of latent cooling.
But since this is on a heat pump, how do I evaluate if the oversized coil will adversely affect the heating?
If I look at the combination's EER on the AHRC website, is that enough to determine that it is OK?
I got the feeling they stuck the oversized coil on the proposal because that is just their standard procedure, not because of anything about my load or conditions.
They first wanted to put in a 3 ton. When I asked why, they mentioned square footage. When I insisted on 2.5 ton, and said I preferred a j-calc instead of square footage based sizing, he said he used WrightSoft to determine my sizing and came up with 2.88 tons. But he did not measure my house, ask about insulation, count windows, or anything else.
It is not easy to find a company that wants to follow the steps and procedures recommended on this site, at least not in July. Maybe in October.
-
07-02-2010, 11:55 AM #10
-
07-02-2010, 12:14 PM #11
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Albuquerque NM
- Posts
- 2,445
Check the HSPF. 8.5 is good, more is better. Check the heating capacity at 47F and 17F. You should see more than one coil listed for a particular furnace/HP combo, so you can compare the performance of the combos with each coil. There's a lot of good info in the AHRI directory, though it can be difficult to search.
Maybe, but if the AHRI numbers are good and it's sized right for your house, you don't really care about their motives. If you spot a combo with a better coil you could ask them about it.
If he didn't do any measurements, his Wrightsoft calculation is gargage.
Remember -> garbage in, garbage out.
Yes, but if you do your homework and are confident of the sizing and equipment selections, then the most important thing you need is an expert installer. Like I like to say, "eliminate the variables".
If you can find a company who can 1) make good sizing calculations and decisions, 2) select good equipment for your home and your needs, 3) and do a good job installing, you have a winner. Personally, I don't have much confidence I can find all three of those in one company, so I'm going to be very involved in the first two, and focus on finding a good installer as my top priority.
-
07-02-2010, 12:22 PM #12
-
07-02-2010, 12:34 PM #13
Although, item 3 (finding a good installer) will be constrained by item 2 (select good equipment for your home and your needs).
The problems with item 1 and item 2 are a) good load sizing software is expensive and moderately complex; b) most vendors provide little real product information to consumers and there aren't very good sources to learn how to objectively evaluate the information provided. A lot of the information they do provide is hidden in meaningless marketing terms. Carrier's modulating furnace is multi-stage rather than 3 stage; Trane's compressors are 'Climatuff' whether they are reciprocating or scroll.
Can I sell you some 'Corinthian' leather? Or a 'Body by Fisher'?


Reply With Quote
