+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Discharge or Supply air?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Fl
    Posts
    123
    Post Likes

    Discharge or Supply air?

    Just one for discussion, while trying to create a conventional naming system, the question has arrisen. With a straight cool unit would you call the air in the duct after the cooling coil "supply air" or "discharge air"? Would you differentiate based on sensor location (like temp right off the coil vs temp further up the duct) if you only had 1 sensor? Now both sensors. Now add a duct heater, and name the sensors before and after the heater. How about F&B units? Might call the sensor after the bypass "mixed" and the other "cooling coil", but how many different locations can you think of and what would you call them and why?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    74
    Post Likes
    We usually use PREHEAT, REHEAT, COOLING COIL, (DE)HUMIDIFICATION TEMPS etc if there are multiple temps on a unit. If there is only one temp we call SUPPLY TEMP (or discharge temp, user preference)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    109
    Post Likes
    We had a great teacher at the Johnson Controls Instititute that told us that these namings should be point of reference referenced. A air handlering units discharge temp is a vav box supplies air temp.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Fl
    Posts
    123
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    That part makes sense, some apps have a standard name for some points, but when you are renaming points from DCSs, UNTs VMAs and point multiplexers, sometimes the naming gets a bit crazy. one of my customers says "air from the grill is supply air because it supplys the room" and another says it is discharge from the grill and supplied from the unit. We usually use the discharge from the unit and supply if the sensor is after a heat strip, but some customers want what they want no matter the logic. Just a query to see how everyone else decides on naming. thanks for the feedback so far.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    334
    Post Likes
    By that JCI logic, it should be VAV inlet temp.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Fl
    Posts
    123
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Where does that come from? The VMA and VAV controllers (single duct)will label a supply air sensor "Box Supply Temp", and (dual duct) Dis Air Temp, so I guess Im not sure where that label comes from.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    833
    Post Likes
    We always use discharge air for outlet of vav and source air temp for inlet.

    For AHU/RTU i have always seen supply air temp. Then use pre/post coil for temps in between.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    301
    Post Likes
    How about leaving and entering.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,411
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Under_Control View Post
    Just one for discussion, while trying to create a conventional naming system, the question has arrisen. With a straight cool unit would you call the air in the duct after the cooling coil "supply air" or "discharge air"? Would you differentiate based on sensor location (like temp right off the coil vs temp further up the duct) if you only had 1 sensor? Now both sensors. Now add a duct heater, and name the sensors before and after the heater. How about F&B units? Might call the sensor after the bypass "mixed" and the other "cooling coil", but how many different locations can you think of and what would you call them and why?
    Well, the main thing is that we make every reasonable attempt to avoid ambiguity, and to be consistent.

    In general, if some process is performed, or can be, by whatever equipment upon the media (air or water) to change its properties; then the final outlet temperature (or whatever) of said equipment would be referred to as "Discharge ...".

    If its a mixing situation, but downstream within the same equipment further changes can be made to the air or water stream then a temp probe within the mixing area would be called "Mixed".

    We try to be specific.

    In some cases, with some equipment configurations, we find that using terms like "Entering ..." and "Leaving..." are the better choice. For instance, on a recent job I was working with an AHU which had a preheat coil. There is an averaging temp sensor directly after the coil. And it is labeled Preheat Coil Leaving Temp. So as to be specific, since there are several other coils and temperature probes in the unit.

    In the case of VAV's, on each VAV graphic screen the temp probe in the final discharge air stream is called a DAT. Now, on each such screen we also typically show the associated air handler's DAT, and label it that way. i.e. AHU #2 DAT. As versus labeling it "Supply Air Temp". Since, if we don't actually have a temp probe in the duct just before the VAV, we don't actually ... really ... know what the air temp is at that point.

    I've seen numerous cases where an air stream has picked up considerable heat between the point where it left the air handler and arrived at a VAV.

    To further be clear, we take pains to ensure that on both our drawings and on our graphic screens the precise arrangement of equipment components and placement of sensors is accurate and reflects reality.

    And if a particular sensor is called something in one place, its referred to by that exact same name anywhere else it's value appears. Both on additional graphic screens, and on our drawings.

    As concerns customer preferences, what can I say? Its their equipment and their front end. If they want something named whatever despite our best efforts to persuade them otherwise, we re-name it to whatever they want.
    A site where I stash some stuff that might be interesting to some folks.
    http://cid-0554c074ec47c396.office.l...e.aspx/.Public

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Northern California/Bay Area
    Posts
    72
    Post Likes
    how about "Goesinta" and "Goesouta"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    336
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by clmair2fly View Post
    how about "Goesinta" and "Goesouta"
    Bless you!
    gnomethang
    _______________________________________________
    "Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."
    - The Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,790
    Post Likes
    My boss is misogynistic so we call it Supply not Discharge. Sounds like puss or blood.

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •