Results 14 to 20 of 20
Thread: Amonia absorbtion chillers
-
08-27-2010, 02:54 PM #14
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Hanoi, Vietnam
- Posts
- 23
You are correct. Though quite safe, it's still possibility of leaking. Safety, i think, is the most common factor when someone thinks about ammonia system.
Here is article in Ashrae Journal - "Ammonia Future", it talks a lot about Ammonia as a trend in using refrigerant.
-
08-27-2010, 08:50 PM #15
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Arizona
- Posts
- 105
just put it outside in some far corner of the yard and run glycol lines.
-
09-02-2010, 02:52 PM #16
Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- near Richmond, Virginia
- Posts
- 100
Unsafe? but... would it really be much worse than an ammonia leak confined inside of a house, as in a gas fired freezer? if I had to pick, I think I would take my chances with the outside heat pump leaking. I dunno.
-
09-02-2010, 06:15 PM #17
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Cedar Rapids, IA
- Posts
- 473
It will likely take up your entire yard, unless you have multiple acres. Take a look at how big a unit that can only make a few ice cubes is. There are some plans for that around the internet. Multiply by 10 then figure in the added cost of the pump, glycol etc. energy to pump the glycol etc. What are you saving? Better to put the effort into a really efficient DX or a evaporative water cooled condenser.
-
09-06-2010, 01:25 PM #18
I am going to build a solar powered A/C system eventually
That is what I set out to do: build a solar powered absorption chiller. But in working towards that goal I realized that I could more cost effectively spend time by first reducing my need for cooling.
I have some hydronic solar collector panels installed (120 square feet) and have two more (80 square feet) waiting for my pipefitter attentions.
But before I get to that I am replacing my roof with very high SRI standing seam metal roofing - in Solar White. I chose the aluminum substrate which lasts pretty much forever and the coating reflects 83% of the sun's heat back out and away from the house. Out in the bright sun it is cool to the touch.
Plus, I replaced all the siding with styrofoam-filled vinyl over 1" foil faced foam board. And I am adding extensive insulation to the attic spaces.
At present I have six tons of A/C running here and I'd like to get to needing only two tons. At that point I think the solar heat powered absorption system can be done cost effectively.
Well; unless I count my own nearly priceless time. <g>
PHM
---------
Last edited by Poodle Head Mikey; 09-06-2010 at 01:28 PM. Reason: too many b's - not enough d's
PHM
-
09-06-2010, 02:43 PM #19
i think solar absorbers are the way to go
i often wonder why they do not do it in automoboles where you have the free generator/engine????????????I WILL SELL WORK,GENERATE BUSINESS, GO GET NEW CUSTOMERS!
YOU SHUT THE HELL UP AND QUIT RUNNING YOUR MOUTH!
-
09-06-2010, 02:45 PM #20
if ammonia is unsafe just use LIBR
I WILL SELL WORK,GENERATE BUSINESS, GO GET NEW CUSTOMERS!
YOU SHUT THE HELL UP AND QUIT RUNNING YOUR MOUTH!



Reply With Quote