Results 27 to 39 of 95
Thread: ABC's homosexual agenda
-
09-13-2009, 12:06 AM #27
Well Seaton take it for what it is worth but I would say that this attitude has a very large bearing with the reason you are in your current situation. This country is failing and our position in the world is failing because of a serious lack of moral standards.
If you and others cannot see that children seeing that their idols on TV and in the movies have no moral brake and that anything goes as far as restraints in life give them the go ahead for similar conduct, I feel sorry for you. Peer pressure is a major obstacle to overcome in a young persons life and when those on the public stage exhibit no restraint in their behavior it makes it that much harder for a young person to buck the trend.
-
09-13-2009, 12:16 AM #28
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
To address the 1st paragraph:
Think what you want but gays on tv has nothing to do with how I, u, my daughter, or the easter bunny conduct themselves.
2nd:
Don't feel sorry for me. I'm a grown man, who had made mistakes, but is on the fast track to fixing them.
And you think gays need to show restraint in what is natural for them?? LOL; Are you telling me that all of a sudden you could choose who you're attracted to?? It's this way of thinking that just drives me crazy. Like if they just block out these insticts they can be "normal", whatever that means.
-
09-13-2009, 12:32 AM #29
I do not know for sure if gays are born that way or not. I do know that bisexual behavior is a choice and this is on the rise especially among young women. If you deny this you have your head in the sand. Yong women see this stuff on TV and think what is the harm, also why do you think sexting is becoming such a big thing. Guys see this stuff on TV and they want girls to perform for them and the girls see little harm.
Long term this behavior is going to come back and haunt them in a future relationship or in their careers.
-
09-13-2009, 12:40 AM #30
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 2,178
Some people want to lead us to believe that a 30 minute tv program or a Hollywood movie does not affect our children.
Yet, advertisers are willing to pay many thousands of dollars for a one minute ad because they KNOW that people are affected by what they watch and sales will increase due to that 60 second ad.
We and our children are affected by what we watch! When we regularly hear the same message we gradually become more accepting of that message especially as those around us also become accepting of the message.
I know this is true from some who post here. People believing things that they never would have considered just a few years ago.
-
09-13-2009, 12:45 AM #31
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
-
09-13-2009, 12:54 AM #32
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 2,178
There is no evidence for a "gay" gene. There is however, a great deal of evidence that people are influenced by society, friends, parents and the media.
We choose our actions and are responsible for those actions. I was raised in a moral home with moral parents and relatives. My children are being raised the same. It is interesting that they are (as I have) following in the tradition of those very moral principles by which we were raised.
So don't make the claim that we are not influenced by our upbringing. We absolutely are and parents must take an active role in what our children view, hear and learn. It matters a great deal.
-
09-13-2009, 01:07 AM #33
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
-
09-13-2009, 06:39 AM #34No reserve. No retreat. No regrets.
For those who have fought for it, freedom has a sweetness the protected will never know.
http://www.airwarvietnam.com/16thSOSGunners2.jpg
Proud member of KA Club
-
09-13-2009, 07:49 PM #35"I could have ended the war in a month. I could have made North Vietnam look like a mud puddle."
"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them."
Barry Goldwater
-
09-13-2009, 09:26 PM #36
Thats why I watch "Fast Money" and "Watch TV get rich" no funny stuff on these shows
Last edited by coolperfect; 09-13-2009 at 09:57 PM.
-
09-13-2009, 09:40 PM #37
One of the most used references on linking gays (we are talking male not lesbian abuse because lesbian sexual child abuse is rare) with child abuse is a report written by long time (by his own admission) anti-gay activist Steve Baldwin. He writes:
Probably a good answer is found inIt is simply amazing that gay propagandists and sexology "experts" are successfully bamboozling the public and the media into believing that a mans exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality! But if an exclusive attraction of a male to other males of any age is not homosexuality, what is?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...the-false-link
From an extensive repost on child abuse.In contrast, child molesters often exert power and control over children in an effort to dominate them. They do experience sexual desire for adults, but molest children episodically, for reasons apart from sexual desire, much as rapists enjoy power, violence and controlling their humiliated victims. Indeed, research supports that a child molester isn't any more likely to be homosexual than heterosexual.
Page 65Sexual Abuse: In cases where sexual abuse was indicated as the primary substantiated maltreatment, 63% (an estimated 1,859) involved female children, and 37% (an estimated 1,075) involved males. The proportion of males to females varies considerably by age group. There were approximately the same number of male and female victims under 8 years of age, with slightly more males in the 4 to 7 age group and slightly more females in the group up to 3 years of age. Females, however, constituted 62% of the victims aged 8 to 11 years and 79% of the adolescent victims.
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cm-vee/cs...se_final_e.pdf
The Badgley Report of the mid-80s concluded that 53 percent of females and 31 percent of males have been victims of one or more unwanted sexual acts.http://www.cornwallinquiry.ca/en/hea...pdf/Sports.pdfWhy Sport Organizations are Vulnerable to Sex Offenders
Sex offenders target all kinds of organizations where children and youth are present, not just sport organizations of course. Sexual abusers look for circumstances and characteristics that will make it easy, or easier, to find and target victims.
If we are going to paint a segment of the population with a wide brush I would say you should be more afraid of who is coaching your children than gays.
-
09-13-2009, 09:58 PM #38
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
You are talking about a very small percentage of gays, not most.
Hey, I don't think gay sex is right, but I choose my battles where I see fit. This is a battle that isn't worth fighting!!!!
Oh, and show me some proof that gays have a higher instance of child molestation. I'm not buying that.
-
09-13-2009, 10:01 PM #39
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Washington
- Posts
- 7,405
This is long, but debunks most of what you say.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbo...lestation.html



Reply With Quote