Results 14 to 20 of 20
-
08-17-2009, 11:17 PM #14
It's still the Carrier compressor. I'm told 42Hz is the bare minimum, for bearing reasons.
God Bless the USA
-
08-18-2009, 06:58 PM #15
-
08-19-2009, 10:35 AM #16
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 371
What kida $$$$ for the conversion? Looks like a job well done!
"Dying aint much, its living thats hard." (Josey Whales)
-
08-19-2009, 10:46 PM #17
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Bay Area California
- Posts
- 320
Capt Jack...
i appreciate the question but it would not be proper for me to discuss that...
i will say this...
this technology is not about a compressor change out... it is a system upgrade or enhancement idea...
think about any system and ask what would or could be possible if the compressor(s) had the ability to unload to 10% or even 5% demand...
all the rules change when you can reduce the lift, slow your velocity and you dont have to return the oil... at low loads you can literally watch the liquid refrigerant moving thru the ll sight glass...
these retrofits (chiller conversion or DX retro) are not cookie cutter and each retrofit with its system complexities needs to be evaluated, engineered and estimated individually...
thank you,
chiller rob
-
08-20-2009, 12:14 AM #18
Good looking install/retro Rob.
So which float did you end up using?GO DAWGS!
-
08-20-2009, 10:24 PM #19
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Bay Area California
- Posts
- 320
9900,
we used a float for an XR same tonnage range...
they are all the same except for the lenghts and width of the slots...
it is interesting to hold the R22 valve next to the 134a and see the differance in flow between the two refrigerants...
i would estimate the 134a to have about 1/3 more flow...
Thanks all for the comments...
Rob
-
08-20-2009, 11:00 PM #20
If your looking for that much of a turndown the Turbocor would be the way to go. It would certainly more efficient with the fact that there would be no oil either. as far as a vsd the flow curve on the carrier wheel would probably drop out around 35 hz plus you still need some rotational speed for the bearings to float properly. I would go with the turbocor. It would be a hell of a lot less to maintain also.


Reply With Quote
