+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Undersized geothermal system?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Va.
    Posts
    253
    Post Likes
    Phosphates in a Geo are you kidding

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    27
    Post Likes
    ROFL 2nu2no. I was lokking at your avitar and at 1rst thought it was black trash bags at 2nd look. I thought No, it looks more like black fish. Then I realized it was the mid section of a motor cycle. Time for an eye test I guess.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Va.
    Posts
    253
    Post Likes
    GSX1300BK it's 181.5 hp @ the crank or 163-165 hp @ the rear tire

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    27
    Post Likes
    Right on it sounds like a sweet bike. I told my wife I need to get a another bike. It's been awhile since I've had one. She said ok as long as it has a side car for our daughter and she rides on back. She almost killed me when I expressed, That would defeat the whole pupose of getting a bike and the one I get won't have a passenger seat.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Va.
    Posts
    253
    Post Likes
    the wife will never ride this one, she likes the Ultra Classic

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kathleen GA
    Posts
    238
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by redmondtech View Post
    I have been installing and servicing geothermal now for about three years. the company i work for is the biggest geothermal installers in central PA
    A few questions i must ask:

    Why are you going open loop?
    What we have found is that the open loop system needs to have more flow then closed loop system due to the loop water and not being able to take advantage of an antifreeze. which brings up another problem what happens when temp. gets below freezing? even though the loop will be below the frost line (and since you are going with wells it is a better advantage) But pulling up ground water will bring in sediment which is going to plug your coaxle coil quicker then a closed loop would. and another problem with open loops or pump and dump is what happens when north carolina has a drought which occurs often in the southern climates. (i have a sister that lives in creedmore NC which is close tothe durham area.

    Another good note to think about is each ton should have around 200 ft per ton or for every 1200 btu

    First, if you are going open loop then you don't have to really worry about loop size. You simply need to insure that the inflow and return wells are as far a part as possible (at least 50 feet). If you can have them at different depths that helps also. Do make sure to go deep enough to avoid drought issues.

    Redmontech: Your post confuses me on several fronts. You state open loops need more flow because they can not take advantage of antifreeze. Everything I ever see is that the antifreeze has less heat transfer than water and requires more pump power too. This should mean that an open source unti would require slightly less flow - not more. Can you explain your logic or why your company is seeing the reverse of what engineering predicts and most other companies have found? Thanks.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •