Results 14 to 21 of 21
Thread: Energy effeciency of new home
-
07-11-2008, 05:18 PM #14
I was refering to the fact as houses are built tigher, the amount of fresh air infiltrating the declines to the point were most IAQ experts suggest fresh air ventilation be mechanically controlled. Many of the poster on this forum do not support mechanical fresh air ventilation. I do. In addition, green grass climates have enough wet cool weather that well insulated homes do not have enough cooling load to remove the moisture of the occupants and fresh air to maintain <50RH. Regards TB
Bear Rules: Keep our home <50% RH summer, controls mites/mold and very comfortable.
Provide 60-100 cfm of fresh air when occupied to purge indoor pollutants and keep window dry during cold weather. T-stat setup/setback +8 hrs. saves energy
Use +Merv 10 air filter. -Don't forget the "Golden Rule"
-
07-11-2008, 05:50 PM #15
its not that we don't support mechanical ventilation. Just don't push it when it is not needed.
A 2000 sq ft house with 4 occupants needs more fresh air, then a 3500 sq ft house with only 2 occupants.
So the larger house may be tighter, and still not need mechanical ventilation.
Should he allow provisions for it, sure.
But if he needs 5 to 6 tons for it, its not all that tight.
-
07-11-2008, 05:53 PM #16
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 50
ICF
I made another post today. I am interested in the ICF reward wall system. The people I spoke with today use this and they do use a heat/air exchanger near the furnace to circulate outside air. I would not have a problem with this either. I just do not know enough about this. What do you mean a cooling load to remove moisture?
thanks again
-
07-11-2008, 06:27 PM #17
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Central Maryland
- Posts
- 246
-
07-11-2008, 09:26 PM #18
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- south louisiana
- Posts
- 2,199
have you checked into SIPS building?
IMO this is by far the more superior building system.
SIPS panels are osb on both sides with foam sandwiched between.
No thermal loss due to framing members for a continous R-value.
Stick framed homes have 20 to 30% of walls that are wood only
depending on framing methods. SIPS eliminates these areas where
studs lessen overall wall insulation.
SIPS panels for walls, floors, ceiling or roof installs are available, in
both 4" and 6" thickness.
I've tested (blower door tests)on many of these homes (sips, icf, stick built) and find SIPS to be the 'tighter' of the three.
In a 'tighter' house hvac load is reduced. I think that ICF has a hvac sizing and that SIPS also advocates proper sizing of system.
The savings of smaller properly sized hvac system will allow you to spend that $$
on other efficiency choices.
If your home is 'tight' meaning that the air changes per hour are less than .25 ach
you will need to add make up air. Otherwise your home will have the potential for many
IAQ issues, along with health issues.
Many people do not understand the need for fresh air because the homes & the ductwork are not tested for leakage. A home that has a lot of air infiltration will
not need fresh air, because the house will suck air in through the many leakage areas.
Once these leakage areas are sealed, then adding fresh air allows you to filter, and dehumidify the air before it enters the home.
I hear a lot of folks saying that their house is tight..but the fact is that you don't know
until it is tested.
Also in my area I find lots of duct leakage. In new construction
1.5 to 2 tons of leakage is not uncommon. With proper sealing methods duct leakage can be reduced to 10%. Companies like Comfort Institute promote 'the house as a system' which incorperates all the componets working together.
Many of the hvac companies that I work with had never tested their ductwork.
For them to understand the testing methods and find the areas of leakage made
it much easier to achieve lesser duct leakage amounts.
Also if you can locate your ductwork in the conditoned space leakage becomes a non issue, and is a great savings.
(anyone ever play around with Man J and customize the inputs to include ducts in conditoned space??)
I like Jeldwen windows..mostly because it is an affordable window that is well made
..and of course it tests well. Do invest in the low e.
Best of luck to you and congrats on building better.The cure of the part should not be attempted without the cure of the whole. ~Plato
-
07-11-2008, 09:40 PM #19
Just did another post explaining the concept. I have a well insulated home that has required very little a/c so far this year dispite many 85^F days. I remove 30-50 pints of water each day to maintain <50%RH. I did not start my dehumidifier until my basement was+70%RH and the mainfloor was +60%RH. That waas about 3 weeks ago. Find my previous post with data graphs. Today Madison ws 85^F, 65%RH, my house is 76^F, 50%RH with very little a/c. I will post the data next week. MY flaw is that I do not provide mechanical fresh air, only a cracked window plus building imperfections. A cracked window is not enough fresh air when the home is occupied. I will correct soon. Regards TB
Bear Rules: Keep our home <50% RH summer, controls mites/mold and very comfortable.
Provide 60-100 cfm of fresh air when occupied to purge indoor pollutants and keep window dry during cold weather. T-stat setup/setback +8 hrs. saves energy
Use +Merv 10 air filter. -Don't forget the "Golden Rule"
-
07-11-2008, 10:23 PM #20
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 50
[QUOTE=energy_rater_La;1923068]have you checked into SIPS building?
IMO this is by far the more superior building system.
SIPS panels are osb on both sides with foam sandwiched between.
No thermal loss due to framing members for a continous R-value.
Stick framed homes have 20 to 30% of walls that are wood only
depending on framing methods. SIPS eliminates these areas where
studs lessen overall wall insulation.
SIPS panels for walls, floors, ceiling or roof installs are available, in
both 4" and 6" thickness.
I have checked into SIPS building materials. IF it does what is says, it looks very impressive. However, this would not be a good fit for us what we are doing currently. I cannot bring in a totally new construction method and not step on my builders toes. The ICF is a little different. I Like the fact that these ways of building are far superior to what is done traditionally and I am willing to change my way of thinking, I just have to help my builder do the same.
thanks for the comments.
-
07-12-2008, 01:06 PM #21
No two houses are the same, everything changes with climate, house layout, how a house is orientated, the owner's expectations, etc...
But, I have 4,000 sq. ft. of conditioned space in north central Texas, I keep my house at 74 degrees and 42% humidity, and it all works with a 2 ton heat pump. It is all done with a fairly standard frame construction.
Energy efficiency (for my climate) depends on
1. Put the duct work in conditioned space
2. Make sure the sun never shines in a window in the summer time
3. Control Infiltration - windows and doors are not the primary cause of leaky houses
4. More than minimum standards for insulation. (the least important of them all)
Get all of that RIGHT, and the HVAC part is easy.



Reply With Quote