+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: How much leakage requires removal from service.....R-22 WSHP

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Soudern Kaliphonistan
    Posts
    298
    Post Likes

    How much leakage requires removal from service.....R-22 WSHP

    Is there some threshold at which a leaking unit must be removed from service?

    I have a water source heat pump which is leaking its charge (into the water, we presume as we cannot find a leak anywhere else). It holds 2.6# and we are having to put 2# into this thing, now on a weekly basis....

    the bid packages are out on the street, but in a bureaucracy like I work in, its still going to be a month or so before we can get a replacement.

    I am (sort of) hoping there is some regulation...It might give me some leverage with the contract department.....since it's cooling their space.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Anderson, South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    21,021
    Post Likes
    There's no limit, you can charge it everyday if you want but at some point you could've bought a new system with what you've spent on refrigerant.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,571
    Post Likes
    I believe it's gotta hold at least 50 lbs per circuit before EPA gets involved.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    1,424
    Post Likes
    The epa would disagree

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    1,424
    Post Likes
    I think im wrong. I think it needs to have more than 50 pounds in it for them to care.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,571
    Post Likes
    See trigger rates on page B1

    http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/...d/guidance.pdf



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,571
    Post Likes
    We've been dealing with a lot of this lately. Even retrofitting to 407c.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    227
    Post Likes
    u dont have to " guess its the heat exchanger" you can prove this with a sniffer

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    227
    Post Likes
    2# a week wow time to replace or repair Thats a good size leak

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Hot South
    Posts
    2,413
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikeylikesit View Post
    it might give me some leverage with the contract department.....since it's cooling their space....

    Thanks!
    If the contract department is the bureaucracy that is causing a month delay in replacing worn out equipment, why would want it to be pushed through faster than normal when it serves their office space??? I would follow their normal procedures and leave them without air for a month....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Soudern Kaliphonistan
    Posts
    298
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    thanks all.

    the delay is because of the fiscal year thing, getting PO's right now is even more complicated because we just went live on a new purchasing system....yes, on the same day as the fiscal new year. UGH!

    So, how do I use the sniffer in water?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sea to Sky
    Posts
    7,033
    Post Likes
    You need to find the drain for the water if it is an open loop. If it is leaking your sniffer will go crazy in the air around the drain.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Soudern Kaliphonistan
    Posts
    298
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    Closed loop......but I could pull a sample. Had not thought of that, as its a huge loop with 70+ units on it.....

    thanks!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    Posts
    1,267
    Post Likes
    Cant u valve it off, drain the unit, unhook piping and stick yer sniffer in? Thats what I do, I dont think a sample of the waters gonna tell u anything.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    460
    Post Likes
    If over 50 pounds of charge per circuit, 15% annual leak rate for ac and 35% for refrigeration and industrial processes. Per the epa

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Birmingham Al
    Posts
    412
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by coolerik View Post
    Cant u valve it off, drain the unit, unhook piping and stick yer sniffer in? Thats what I do, I dont think a sample of the waters gonna tell u anything.
    Do this then tape a rubber glove over the water pipe inlet and watch it inflate the glove. gives the customer a 100% visual that its leaking.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    239
    Post Likes
    Do an isolation, I have seen H10 pick up a leak from clorine that utilities inject into water systems from a water fountain

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,338
    Post Likes
    What's said in this thread is generally correct.

    Then, I saw your location is "Soudern Kal-e-phone-e-ya" and I realized regular rules don't apply. For all intents and purposes, that place is like another country and this is no exception. It looks like you've got two weeks to fix it.

    Everything is regarded as carcinogenic in that state.
    Many products are illegal in that state.

    Is there anything in your facility that holds over 50 lbs of "high GWP" refrigerant? It looks like you need to become registered. The language is different from the EPA. It does not say that you can let it leak all you want. Just operating one equipment with over 50 lbs of "any refrigerant with over 150 GWP" in that special political subdivision apparently triggers a requirement to fix leaks regardless of charge amount. It also appears that you need a certification to buy 134a.

    Stuff like this is probably a high priority environmental crime of media interest in CA if they figured out about it.

    http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/rmp/rmp.htm
    http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/rmp/RMP_Service_FAQ.pdf

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bay Area California
    Posts
    43,458
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by ICanHas View Post
    It also appears that you need a certification to buy 134a.
    In northern CA, anyone can go into any auto store and buy 134a. Of course, it's a lot more pricey than what we pay at the wholesalers.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICanHas View Post
    Stuff like this is probably a high priority environmental crime of media interest in CA if they figured out about it.
    LOL, yeah, for some reason we attract all of the whacko's. I'm guessing it's because of all of the government handouts and entitlement programs. Something to do with the lowest common denominator, maybe(?).

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,338
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by BBeerme View Post
    In northern CA, anyone can go into any auto store and buy 134a. Of course, it's a lot more pricey than what we pay at the wholesalers.
    Did you read up about those? They're resealable cans like spray bottles and there's a $10 deposit on them. Retailers have to pay the deposit to the wholesaler and buyers must pay deposit to retailer.

    Buyer takes unused portions back to the store with a receipt to get the deposit back. Retailers send them back to the wholesaler to get their deposit back and unused portions supposedly get reclaimed.

    What you said makes sense. Here's what I gathered: Larger than 2 lbs, EPA card required. Even if they're under 2 lbs, FEDERAL law restricts ozone depleting refrigerants and it doesn't let you buy anything bigger than 2 lbs or any ozone depeting refrigerants regardless of size without certifications.

    § 95391. Prohibitions.

    (a) Prohibitions. On or after January 1, 2011, no person shall sell, supply, offer for sale, or distribute any high-GWP refrigerant for use as a refrigerant, unless for reclamation or destruction, in a container with a refrigerant capacity of two pounds or greater unless:

    (1) The buyer is a certified technician pursuant to Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 82, §82.40 or §82.161; or (so on and on and on....)

    I'm no lawyer and I take no responsibility for misreading your state's wacko rules.

    So, what I'm seeing is that R-134a and 410A in large tanks require license in CA, because they're > 2 lbs. R-22 and pound cans of F12 still requires a license, because of the requirements at the federal level.

    The EPA regulates at the federal level ozone depleting substances, substitutes for them, or "substitute for substitute of ozone depleting refrigerant" when the original is still available.

    R-22/12: regulated. Offering of products as replacement for R22: regulated. 407C, or MO99 are regulated in marketing as replacement to R22. since R22/R12 is still available, substitutes for approved substitute of R22/R12 are still subject to regulations.

    If you marketing people had your idea (LED mercury free) light bulb light up about peddling hydrocarbon explosive gases in California just because HC isn't excluded by state law, hold up.

    The feds still regulate them as above. On more local level, AHJ prohibits them through through International Mechanical Code IMC even if the Air Resource Board doesn't mention it.

    There's essentially no practical legal use for hydrocarbon in air conditioning system in the US.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •