The rest of the post mostly explained these sentences in parables for you.We are not really entitled to our opinions, nor should we be, because such an entitlement is the enemy of intellectual progress. It creates a kind of intellectual protectionism analogous to economic protectionism that restricts free trade of ideas and so too the progress that comes with that free trade.
Why don't you pick them apart and show us the logical fallacies in them.
Could you try to avoid, "load of crap" and "'taint so!" just to humour me.