Results 40 to 49 of 49
Thread: HHO Fireplace won't stay lit....
-
07-19-2008, 07:00 PM #40
-
07-20-2008, 11:20 AM #41
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- CT
- Posts
- 190
I can jumpstart my e250 with my cordless drill battery, 18v dewalt
Leak lock is not for plumbers
-
07-20-2008, 11:29 AM #42
-
02-24-2012, 08:43 PM #43
New Guest
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 1
Question
Are you looking at the full picture when it comes to hho heating the generator itself makes about as much heat as an electric heater and the heat form the gas is more heat created. Most people that look at the energy in and out don't consider the btu made form the generation of the Hydrogen oxygen gas. Thanks. I am not sure if this makes it a more efficient heater or not mine puts out around 108 when producing gas then when you burn the gas you get more. Only a question just wondering if this is in you recession of heat produced.
-
04-10-2012, 02:30 PM #44
New Guest
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 1
furnace pro, heating in the wrong place?
I have constructed a few HHO generators, and they produce quite a bit of HHO (im attempting to apply it to my truck), however they also are producing quite a bit of heat. Have you run into any overheating issues in the generator? Im using 2'' PVC with a 1 and 3/4 ss tube with a 1 1/2 ss tube inside seperated by pvc rings. The generator is running 12v at about 20-30 amps. The water is steady at about 100df, but the terminals and about 2 inches of the power wire are reaching temps around 300deg f!! i dont want to melt the pvc! have you had any issues similar to this?
-
04-15-2012, 01:04 AM #45
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Centerville, Iowa
- Posts
- 359
Holy 5 year old thread, Batman.
What the OP has is not a water fueled heater, or an HHO powered heater, it is a Rube Goldberg inspired electric space heater, and assuming the whole contraption is located in the conditioned space it provides exactly what any other electric resistance heater provides, 3.41 BTUs for each watthour consumed. Actually, it probably provides less due to the unwanted chemical reactions in the electrolyzer, imperfect combustion of the hydrogen, and plain system leaks.
This guy should sell an "Infrared" electric cube heater or a fake "Amish" electric fireplace instead, at least then he would make some coin while scamming the public out of their money for yet another space heater.
I laugh then cry every time someone mentions HHO or any of the other various gas-saver/over-unity devices, like a video I saw of a huge trunk sized electrolyzer using 1500 watts that only managed to make a lawnmower engine idle, that same 2HP worth of electricity could likely have powered an electric motor that would have spun that mower engine to destruction.
-
04-15-2012, 03:01 AM #46
Yeah, it makes me want to /facepalm every time someone starts in on a discussion of stuff like this.
I gave up following the over unity and zero point energy chuckleheads.
When one of them comes up with an actual device that is available for public scrutiny, I'll pay attention again.
And by public scrutiny, I don't mean "donate" thousands of dollars and get rewarded with an in person demonstration where you are not allowed to touch it or inspect it closely like one scam "charity" outfit does.If more government is the answer, then it's a really stupid question.
-
04-15-2012, 08:42 AM #47
Relocated the 5 year old thread to the "Fireplace" section of the site.
-
04-16-2012, 12:42 AM #48
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- PA
- Posts
- 160
-
04-16-2012, 07:38 AM #49
Just so everyone knows HG launched the Aqueon as a novelty with a list price of about $50K. They only made about 3 or 4 and the last one sold for close to $70K. One was installed on a yacht belonging to a former HHT exec. Not practical at all. The flame is tiny and hard to see unless its dark because it is technically not a luminous flame. The hearth industry is built around a yellow tipped luminous flame because you want to see a 'natural' flame unlike the heating industry that is after combustion efficiency. Yes, this technology uses a lot of power and is Not cost effective.
Keep the fire inside the fireplace.



Reply With Quote


