Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 14 to 19 of 19

Thread: Testo 416

  1. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    197
    So over the past 2 days I tested the 416 against a couple of Infinity controls. The results improved within the 75 CFM range of one another. With the formula provided by Jim, CFM was even closer. I guess I must have done something wrong to be off like I was before.

    Jim, should I be using the traverse chart on your site for the 416 or split the return duct 3 ways as even as possible? I've been splitting it as even as possible.

    Thanks for all the responses!
    Any fool can know. The point is to understand. Albert Einstein

  2. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Akron
    Posts
    1,144
    Cuervo,

    I have had the best luck with the chart (log method) versus the equal squares method. There have been several articles written about both methods. The sides are split on which is the most accurate. When it comes to turbulent airflow and duct profiles that are not optimized I have found the log method the best. Glad you are getting better results. I best if you measure again following the chart you will be closer.

    Jim
    JLB,

  3. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    In a boiler room
    Posts
    7,130
    I have had good luck with just 3 traverses across a 10 inch return duct.

    I have a chart in my truck, that lays it all in the log-linear method, that I like better than the TruTechTools chart (sorry Jim) for the reason that it is simpler to read. I can't find it in pdf right now, but if you remind me in the morning I will scan it and attach it here.

  4. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    In a boiler room
    Posts
    7,130
    Quote Originally Posted by jim bergmann View Post
    Cuervo,

    I have had the best luck with the chart (log method) versus the equal squares method. There have been several articles written about both methods. The sides are split on which is the most accurate. When it comes to turbulent airflow and duct profiles that are not optimized I have found the log method the best. Glad you are getting better results. I best if you measure again following the chart you will be closer.

    Jim
    I agree on the accuracy of the log linear vs. the equal area method. I believe the log linear argument holds more water.

  5. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Akron
    Posts
    1,144
    No harm no foul for me, I would be interested to see it. I made that one and broke it up into millimeters to make it easier to make the measurements as in the log methods you end up working in 10ths of an inch.
    JLB,

  6. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    In a boiler room
    Posts
    7,130
    By the way Jim, if you have time I would appreciate your in depth explanation of the two methods. Here is a thread I started a while back that didn't get much response on the subject. http://hvac-talk.com/vbb/showthread....ht=tchebycheff

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Comfortech Show Promo Image

Related Forums

Plumbing Talks | Contractor Magazine
Forums | Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine
Comfortech365 Virtual Event