Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    4,373

    Fear of The Unknown

    A common theme seems to be steadily intensifying with those who disagree with information on the internet–a fear of the unknown. There is a constant need to insult or criticize content which disagrees with their own sense of truth. Although confronting fear won’t always make it go away, many researchers suggest that people must alter memory-driven negative attitudes about feared objects, events or the unknown to overcome the fear itself, allowing open-mindedness and multiple perspectives to override negativity.

    When people retain negative attitudes about anything that disagrees with their own version of reality, they are more likely to experience a continued sense of fear than people whose attitudes are less negative. Physiological markers such as heart rate and anticipatory anxiety always increase when measurements are taken in people whose attitudes remain negative.

    Much of our concept of ourselves and our attitudes as individuals in control of our destinies underpins much of our reality or what we think about our existence.

    Some of these attitudes are often based on a powerful association between a fear and a negative feeling that is so strong, that many people can’t see or even think about the fear without experiencing that automatic negative reaction. For example, many people around the world devoted to their religion absolutely fear atheists. They refuse to relate to their position. They will not even conceive the right of atheists to their own opinions and feel extremely threatened by any content promoting the principles of atheism. The same can be true if we reverse the two roles. Neither position will ever advance the other if each can only think negatively about the other. This creates self-righteousness, divisions of superiority and of course ignorance.

    Negative reactions to the unknown instills a sense of weakness in our character, specifically a lack of strength in our own convictions. When people have the need to strongly chastise others for their opinions and information they present, it shows a genuine deficit of attributes related to confidence about our own belief systems, morals and values.

    Those who have confidence in their doctrines do not have to identify all those things they dislike so much in others or attempt to magnify those flaws to please their own conscience. In essence, they feel they must right-fight to support their own belief system since in their minds, a competing system must be incorrect.

    There is always improvement in our outlook when we change the attitude representation. To change the likelihood that negativity or fear is automatically activated when one is placed in a specific situation, we must positively view the opinions of others as valid regardless of our own perception. If somebody see’s the sky as “green” instead of “blue”, instead of immediately declaring their state of mind as incorrect, we can think about how interesting it is that they see the sky “green” and perhaps ask ourselves why their perspective differs so greatly from our own.

    Many of the websites I contribute towards constantly receive criticism for their content, however NONE of them approach other websites or choose to email individuals who have oppositions to their own views. Why? Because they know they are entitled to those views. They don’t engage them and they certainly don’t wish to begin any type of conflict with those who think differently than they do. Everybody has their own path in life and their learning is unique, allowing them to experience that uniqueness and growth at the deepest levels of their being. Their views are no more correct or incorrect than any other, especially since truth is 360 degrees and all perception defines our reality.

    While many may disagree with that, it is the belief system of what is now millions of people on Earth. People are entitled to their own opinions, but if they feel the need to encourage websites or authors to change and direct their content towards a mentality that agrees with an opposing view, perhaps these same people should be looking into their own belief systems to discover why they feel so threatened or wronged by simple words. The same words can both positively and negatively affect millions of people. The difference lies in how we perceive another’s reality to be different from our own. We are all very much the same–just experiencing and learning at different rates. No one rate of learning is more superior or advanced than another, just different.

    It is an opportunity to really learn something about ourselves–that judgement on others is only a judgement on ourselves. Other people in our lives serve as our own reflection of the imperfections we seek to correct in ourselves. We attract every person in our life for a reason–to show us who we are. If you think everybody in your life is around you by coincidence, you’re not paying attention to the very valuable lessons they are teaching you.

    When we embrace our uniqueness and understand that every human being is here for a purpose and to follow a specific path, our judgement, criticism and control over others disappears. In the end, would you rather be right, or would you rather be kind? Be kind, with love and compassion, but most of all, allow others to just be. I can guarantee that if you practice this, you will be amazed at how quickly your outlook on your experiences will change. Most of all, you will never see information as a threat again.

    Michael Forrester
    "The perfect Totalitarian State is one where the political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,757
    So what happens when that other person actions, life style, beliefs or past history represents an actual threat? What happens when that persons belief system requires the persecution of other persons beliefs?
    "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the public's own money.
    - Alexis de Toqueville, 1835

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    4,373
    Quote Originally Posted by DeltaT View Post
    So what happens when that other person actions, life style, beliefs or past history represents an actual threat? What happens when that persons belief system requires the persecution of other persons beliefs?
    You just didnt get the meaning of the article.


    Roy
    "The perfect Totalitarian State is one where the political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by royc View Post
    You just didnt get the meaning of the article.


    Roy
    How do you know I didn't?
    "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the public's own money.
    - Alexis de Toqueville, 1835

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    4,373
    Quote Originally Posted by DeltaT View Post
    How do you know I didn't?
    Cause if you would have understood, you would not have asked such a question.

    Roy
    "The perfect Totalitarian State is one where the political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beatrice, NE
    Posts
    2,059
    I must not have gotten it either. What I got out of it was if someone says something that is wrong, by my persecption, I should not correct them because their perception is different. So with that in mind if a someone says that they should dite a match to see where they are going in a room full of propane, even though my perception tells me that's the wrong thing to do, I should let them blow us both to hell and back, because their perciption is not as progressed as mine.

    Ok, extreme example, but I lived during the Vietnam war {yes it was a war not a conflict, just not declared}. When the revisionist history books come out with false information about how things went down I should be quiet, because it's anothers reality not mine? If these things are not corrected how will we ever know what's right? If there is no right or wrong how can we ever be sure of anything in our lives. This sounds like a ploy to make people doubt their beliefs, what ever they are. Don't get me wrong, some beliefs need to be done away with, like most things racist. However, just because some things should be questioined, doesn't mean that everything should.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    4,373
    Quote Originally Posted by kls-ccc View Post
    I must not have gotten it either. What I got out of it was if someone says something that is wrong, by my persecption, I should not correct them because their perception is different. So with that in mind if a someone says that they should dite a match to see where they are going in a room full of propane, even though my perception tells me that's the wrong thing to do, I should let them blow us both to hell and back, because their perciption is not as progressed as mine.

    Ok, extreme example, but I lived during the Vietnam war {yes it was a war not a conflict, just not declared}. When the revisionist history books come out with false information about how things went down I should be quiet, because it's anothers reality not mine? If these things are not corrected how will we ever know what's right? If there is no right or wrong how can we ever be sure of anything in our lives. This sounds like a ploy to make people doubt their beliefs, what ever they are. Don't get me wrong, some beliefs need to be done away with, like most things racist. However, just because some things should be questioined, doesn't mean that everything should.
    Yes, your right.

    Roy
    "The perfect Totalitarian State is one where the political bosses, and their army of managers, control a population of slaves, who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,645
    I have a fear of being broke and living back under the bridge. I wife makes my fears a reality. I just hang in there. Just Kidding.
    My name is TooCoolforschool and I am a chronic over charger.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    511
    I love when people discount the internet as a reliable source of information. As if information and access to information was so much better when we all used the dewey decimal system and read 'facts' out of 10 year old encyclopedias and science books that had little to no oversight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,297
    Quote Originally Posted by royc View Post
    A common theme seems to be steadily intensifying with those who disagree with information on the internet–a fear of the unknown. There is a constant need to insult or criticize content which disagrees with their own sense of truth. Although confronting fear won’t always make it go away, many researchers suggest that people must alter memory-driven negative attitudes about feared objects, events or the unknown to overcome the fear itself, allowing open-mindedness and multiple perspectives to override negativity.

    When people retain negative attitudes about anything that disagrees with their own version of reality, they are more likely to experience a continued sense of fear than people whose attitudes are less negative. Physiological markers such as heart rate and anticipatory anxiety always increase when measurements are taken in people whose attitudes remain negative.

    Much of our concept of ourselves and our attitudes as individuals in control of our destinies underpins much of our reality or what we think about our existence.

    Some of these attitudes are often based on a powerful association between a fear and a negative feeling that is so strong, that many people can’t see or even think about the fear without experiencing that automatic negative reaction. For example, many people around the world devoted to their religion absolutely fear atheists. They refuse to relate to their position. They will not even conceive the right of atheists to their own opinions and feel extremely threatened by any content promoting the principles of atheism. The same can be true if we reverse the two roles. Neither position will ever advance the other if each can only think negatively about the other. This creates self-righteousness, divisions of superiority and of course ignorance.

    Negative reactions to the unknown instills a sense of weakness in our character, specifically a lack of strength in our own convictions. When people have the need to strongly chastise others for their opinions and information they present, it shows a genuine deficit of attributes related to confidence about our own belief systems, morals and values.

    Those who have confidence in their doctrines do not have to identify all those things they dislike so much in others or attempt to magnify those flaws to please their own conscience. In essence, they feel they must right-fight to support their own belief system since in their minds, a competing system must be incorrect.

    There is always improvement in our outlook when we change the attitude representation. To change the likelihood that negativity or fear is automatically activated when one is placed in a specific situation, we must positively view the opinions of others as valid regardless of our own perception. If somebody see’s the sky as “green” instead of “blue”, instead of immediately declaring their state of mind as incorrect, we can think about how interesting it is that they see the sky “green” and perhaps ask ourselves why their perspective differs so greatly from our own.

    Many of the websites I contribute towards constantly receive criticism for their content, however NONE of them approach other websites or choose to email individuals who have oppositions to their own views. Why? Because they know they are entitled to those views. They don’t engage them and they certainly don’t wish to begin any type of conflict with those who think differently than they do. Everybody has their own path in life and their learning is unique, allowing them to experience that uniqueness and growth at the deepest levels of their being. Their views are no more correct or incorrect than any other, especially since truth is 360 degrees and all perception defines our reality.

    While many may disagree with that, it is the belief system of what is now millions of people on Earth. People are entitled to their own opinions, but if they feel the need to encourage websites or authors to change and direct their content towards a mentality that agrees with an opposing view, perhaps these same people should be looking into their own belief systems to discover why they feel so threatened or wronged by simple words. The same words can both positively and negatively affect millions of people. The difference lies in how we perceive another’s reality to be different from our own. We are all very much the same–just experiencing and learning at different rates. No one rate of learning is more superior or advanced than another, just different.

    It is an opportunity to really learn something about ourselves–that judgement on others is only a judgement on ourselves. Other people in our lives serve as our own reflection of the imperfections we seek to correct in ourselves. We attract every person in our life for a reason–to show us who we are. If you think everybody in your life is around you by coincidence, you’re not paying attention to the very valuable lessons they are teaching you.

    When we embrace our uniqueness and understand that every human being is here for a purpose and to follow a specific path, our judgement, criticism and control over others disappears. In the end, would you rather be right, or would you rather be kind? Be kind, with love and compassion, but most of all, allow others to just be. I can guarantee that if you practice this, you will be amazed at how quickly your outlook on your experiences will change. Most of all, you will never see information as a threat again.

    Michael Forrester

    Perhaps I too am not quite understanding what you are saying. I sort of get the impression (I could be mistaken) that we should be accepting of everyone elses position, opinion or belief and not challenge them because perhaps nobody really can know for sure what is correct. Am I wrong here?

    Do you believe that we all have our own truths that work for us but that there is no such thing as Absolute Truth?

    Hugh

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,297
    Quote Originally Posted by ADillon View Post
    I love when people discount the internet as a reliable source of information. As if information and access to information was so much better when we all used the dewey decimal system and read 'facts' out of 10 year old encyclopedias and science books that had little to no oversight.
    Dillon, you make a great point. I am taking a university class at the moment and we are not allowed to use the internet as a reliable source of information. We can only use books and magazine articles to back our claims as we write papers.

    Yet, sources that are printed and bound cannot be corrected or brought up to date. Wikipedia is constantly edited and brought up to date. If someone messes with the information on Wikipedia e-mails are automatically sent to the primary editors or authors of the Wikipedia article and they can either accept the changes in the article or revert the article to the more correct version. Many of the articles are maintained by experts in the subject matter area of the article and there are usually a number of subject matter experts watching any particular subject for changes, errors, and dated material. Unlike books, Wikipedia articles are constantly brought up to date.

    Hugh

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    17,909
    I question, challenge, and judge everything on the premiss of nothing is as it appears ....especially human beings.
    " Kill a Commie for Mommy! "

    - Colonel David Hackworth (1930-2005), Korean War Vet

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,297
    Quote Originally Posted by coolwhip View Post
    I question, challenge, and judge everything and accept nothing at face value.
    I would challenge that execpt I agree with you.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Comfortech Show Promo Image

Related Forums

Plumbing Talks | Contractor Magazine
Forums | Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine
Comfortech365 Virtual Event