Results 53 to 62 of 62
Thread: Am I Under-firing my Furnace?
-
01-20-2013, 12:13 AM #53
That's incorrect. Energy efficiency and heat transfer efficiency are two entirely different things. If by a feat of engineering prowess a furnace is designed and set up so as to keep the stack temp and excess air constant when switching from low to high fire, then the combustion efficiency will be exactly the same in low and high fire. This is the whole point of O2 trim controls, and in most cases with O2 trim the combustion efficiency will be higher in low fire than in high fire, flame temperature notwithstanding.
-
01-20-2013, 04:21 PM #54
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Mn the state where absolutey nothing is allowed
- Posts
- 1,086
i wasnt speakin of two stage furnaces. only comenting on heat tranfer from fire to chamber to air in response to the OP's question.
i know and agree that low fire usually has a greater o2 content.
excess air ( and therefore o2 ) tends to cool the fire.
i still stand by my staement that a greater temperature difference, the greater heat transfer you have. just ask any wethead about radient panel temp....my boss thinks its possible to repeal the laws of physics
-
01-20-2013, 05:51 PM #55
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Posts
- 165
This furnace and its manual make easy to dial in the gas pressure. First you need to check static pressure to verify airflow then you can use the chart that is either in the install manual or the service manual which you can get at goodmanmfg.com. The chart gives you the temp rise +- 2degree for each airflow. You adjust the gas pressure to get the rise. As long as you are between 1.8 -2.2 and 3.2-3.8 you are good to go. Not that confirming by CA is a bad thing.
eric
-
01-20-2013, 06:18 PM #56
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Posts
- 258
-
01-20-2013, 06:56 PM #57
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- somewhere between here and there
- Posts
- 457
been there, you stated earlier that in a 2 stage furnace the inducer doesnt slow down enuf????? and to much excess air.....am curious, cause all 2 stage furnaces have 2 stage inducer motors, wouldnt the mfg install correct motor cfm for each stage?
or a imissing the obvious????Last edited by BigBacardi; 01-20-2013 at 06:57 PM. Reason: clarification

Please, Please Please......keep the Factory Smoke in the Wires!!!!!
Is it Rum'Oclock yet???
-
01-20-2013, 07:06 PM #58
The heat exchanger diameter, and the flue pipe diameter are size for second stage volume. So an inducer slowing to 66% of its full RPM will be moving more then 65% of the air it does in second stage. Hard to size an inducer to be able to handle max flue pipe length, and still slow down enough for first stage on on short flue pipe runs.
-
01-20-2013, 09:09 PM #59
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Posts
- 258
I have found that by installing the restrictor in the intake improves combustion quite a bit. The manual says to install the restrictor on vent that is 10' or less, on all 40k furnaces some 100k that meet the right vent conditions and TO IMPROVE COMBUSTION. I wish the manufacture would give us real combustion numbers to work with, it would be a lot simpler for all of us.
-
01-20-2013, 10:05 PM #60
-
01-20-2013, 10:18 PM #61
-
01-21-2013, 07:26 AM #62
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Mn the state where absolutey nothing is allowed
- Posts
- 1,086
my boss thinks its possible to repeal the laws of physics



Reply With Quote