+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Efficiency Standards Settlement

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    190
    Post Likes

    Efficiency Standards Settlement

    Did anyone else read this? I'm assuming this just means we are putting off the changes for another year.

    "The terms of the settlement would vacate the current non-weatherized gas furnace and mobile home gas furnace standards, which were to be effective on May 1, 2013, and begin the process for developing a new standard within a year of the finalization of the settlement agreement."

    http://www.hardinet.org/news/2013/01...s-been-reached

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts
    5,136
    Post Likes
    Very interesting

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN, USA
    Posts
    42,886
    Post Likes
    Sounds good to me.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,427
    Post Likes
    That's good news. Hopefully the next process will be a bit more transparent and the general public better informed.
    Use the biggest hammer you like, pounding a square peg into a round hole does not equal a proper fit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    6
    Post Likes
    Yes, read this and found this:

    "The DOE has agreed to amend some of its data collection and information sharing procedures for this rulemaking." from article in http://www.achrnews.com Huh??

    I work in the wholesale end of this. After prepping my contractors for the change what do I tell them now?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,771
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by ahpwilde View Post
    Yes, read this and found this:

    "The DOE has agreed to amend some of its data collection and information sharing procedures for this rulemaking." from article in http://www.achrnews.com Huh??

    I work in the wholesale end of this. After prepping my contractors for the change what do I tell them now?
    Tell them congress out ranks you.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    3,427
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by ahpwilde View Post
    Yes, read this and found this:

    "The DOE has agreed to amend some of its data collection and information sharing procedures for this rulemaking." from article in http://www.achrnews.com Huh??

    I work in the wholesale end of this. After prepping my contractors for the change what do I tell them now?
    Tell them that you understand they're trying hard to earn a living and keep the trust of their customers, but the bureaucrats and lawyers aren't done making their money yet.
    Use the biggest hammer you like, pounding a square peg into a round hole does not equal a proper fit.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    7,473
    Post Likes
    Suscribe.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    719
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by hurtinhvac View Post
    Suscribe.
    X2

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    7,473
    Post Likes
    Judge still hasn't signed it as far as I know, but my co. is confident enough to officially state it is off for the foreseeable future.

    And I just ordered a Klein slip joint hose clamp pliers for those pesky hose spring clamps I was expecting to quickly see much more of...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    70,520
    Post Likes
    Just in case those following this thread haven't heard, furnaces have been taken out of the regional standards forever. The DOE gave up when they couldn't come up with any practical guidelines or justification for creating a situation where some Americans can buy a certain product and other Americans cannot. I think it had to do with creating border patrols and having to have anti-furnace running guard stations at all roads between northern and southern states that caused the DOE to give up.

    The DOE will need to start over in order to implement another furnace fascism fiasco. The condenser/heat pump idiocy is still slated to be in effect, but HARDI is still fighting that one as well.
    Training is important!
    Practical Training is a must!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SE Iowa
    Posts
    5,577
    Post Likes
    Why not start simple and require them for all new construction and not focus on replacments. Require load calculations too.

    Better yet, just leave it up to individual states.



    Sent from my SGPT12 using Tapatalk 2

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    70,520
    Post Likes
    This should never have become a Federal government issue.
    Training is important!
    Practical Training is a must!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SE Iowa
    Posts
    5,577
    Post Likes
    Most things shouldnt. Founding fargers would probably unanmously agree on that.



    Sent from my SGPT12 using Tapatalk 2

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    North Richland Hills, Texas
    Posts
    15,732
    Post Likes
    Damn, and I had a whole business model planned based exchanging 80% furnaces for 13 SEER condensers with a yankee, and reselling them locally for a profit.

    Quote Originally Posted by motoguy128 View Post
    Most things shouldnt. Founding fargers would probably unanmously agree on that.
    See my sig line for my thoughts on the subject.

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •