Results 1,262 to 1,274 of 2796
-
01-10-2013, 06:15 PM #1262
You may be half right. I trust you trust this link. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1602692.html
Last edited by bb; 01-10-2013 at 06:36 PM.
Governments don't tax to get the money they need, governments will always find a need for the money they get. Ronald Wilson Reagon
Born Again KA
-
01-10-2013, 07:14 PM #1263
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Long Beach, CA
- Posts
- 2,477
Who are you talking to? Nobody on this thread has said they are in favor of banning all guns. Why can't you accept that?
Write that stuff to Feinstein or somebody, I'm tired of you not getting through your head that I am in favor of most guns, cops with any type of gun, home protection, hunting (even though it is not for me) and gun sports and competition. I just don’t trust citizens pretending to do law enforcement around me and weapons being sold to the public that are specialized to kill large numbers of people. Got it?
I also don’t like the way gun advocates will not give an inch of any type of gun (maybe for good reason because they what comes next) and they downplay the positive effects of any other solution other than ‘more gun’. They say if something does not completely solve the problem than it is not worth looking into. Well, sorry to break it to you, but more guns is not a cure-all either.
-
01-10-2013, 07:26 PM #1264
Since when is it illegal to carry in California?
http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/california.pdf
While it is a "may issue" state, making issue of a CCW permit an arbitrary thing, carrying a concealed weapon is NOT illegal in California.
-
01-10-2013, 07:30 PM #1265
-
01-10-2013, 08:16 PM #1266
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 11,644
-
01-10-2013, 08:20 PM #1267
-
01-10-2013, 08:37 PM #1268
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 11,644
-
01-10-2013, 08:52 PM #1269
From the NRA meeting today:
Fairfax, Va. – The National Rifle Association of America is made up of over 4 million moms and dads, daughters and sons, who are involved in the national conversation about how to prevent a tragedy like Newtown from ever happening again. We attended today's White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.
We were disappointed with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment. While claiming that no policy proposals would be “prejudged,” this Task Force spent most of its time on proposed restrictions on lawful firearms owners - honest, taxpaying, hardworking Americans. It is unfortunate that this Administration continues to insist on pushing failed solutions to our nation's most pressing problems. We will not allow law-abiding gun owners to be blamed for the acts of criminals and madmen. Instead, we will now take our commitment and meaningful contributions to members of congress of both parties who are interested in having an honest conversation about what works - and what does not.GOVERNMENT
The only parasite dumb enough to kill it's host
-
01-10-2013, 09:21 PM #1270
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 11,644
Coincidence this happened today too?
Former presidents have to give up rides on Air Force One. But now they don't have to give up being shadowed by the armed-and-earpieced bodyguards of the Secret Service.
President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into a law a measure giving him, George W. Bush and future former presidents and their spouses lifetime Secret Service protection, the White House announced.
The legislation, crafted by Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, rolls back a mid-1990s law that imposed a 10-year limit on Secret Service protection for former presidents. Bush would have been the first former commander in chief affected.
At the time, lawmakers who supported the measure said it would save the government millions of dollars. They also argued that former presidents could hire private security firms (as Richard Nixon did after he decided to forgo Secret Service protection in 1985).
The bill had sailed through Congress with bipartisan support—it cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote in early December, and then it zipped through the Senate unopposed. The law also provides protection for former presidents’ kids until age 16. But “protection of a spouse shall terminate in the event of remarriage.”
-
01-10-2013, 10:05 PM #1271
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,202
-
01-10-2013, 10:34 PM #1272
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,202
-
01-10-2013, 10:35 PM #1273
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 2,153
I expect gun control will be the deciding factor on the relection of many in politics. This is a serious and deep issue. Historically those who heavily favor gun control do not get re-elected. Obama is not running again but many others in congress are. Their re-election depends on this one issue.
-
01-10-2013, 11:11 PM #1274I draw all my schematics in crayon now. If they cannot always be correct, they can at least be colorful.
Service calls submitted after 3PM will be posted the next business day.
I give free estimates [Wild Ass Guesses] over the phone.
I am not in business to make money from other people so that I can afford to work for you for free.
If the fall is over, mmmm let's say, 6 feet or so,.. I do not 'bounce' very well.



Reply With Quote