Results 27 to 37 of 37
-
10-12-2012, 09:36 PM #27
CPH is in the thermostat. It digital mimic of a heat anticipator. Set to 3. It will attempt to do 10 minute on, 10 minutes off. On Honeywell thermostats CPH is only accurate(maintained) at the equipments 50% load. Above or below that point it my do more or less cycles.
On the GMH. If you set the stats CPH to 3 or 4, you won't get run times longer then 10 minutes, until its past the homes 60% heat loss mark. So it won't time into second stage, since it can be set to 12 minutes of first stage before it goes to second stage. Weather 3 or 4 CPH works better, is dependent on what the person/customer wants.
-
10-12-2012, 09:51 PM #28
That's cool to know about the 50% being indicative of the system's run state. My Honeywell VisionPro was cycling the a/c this afternoon at 10 minutes on, 10 minutes off, and it was nearly 90 degrees outside. Meaning on a 90 degree day with my new cool roof, my home's heat gain is ~50% of what the system was originally sized for? Hmm....
"In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
10-12-2012, 10:11 PM #29
-
10-12-2012, 10:26 PM #30
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Oklahoma City
- Posts
- 2,591
-
10-12-2012, 11:21 PM #31Which makes more sense to you?
CONSERVATION - turning your thermostat back and being uncomfortable. Maybe saving 5-10%
ENERGY EFFICIENCY - leaving your thermostat where everyone is comfortable. Saving 30-70%
DO THE NUMBERS! Step on a HOMESCALE.
What is comfort? Well, it AIN'T just TEMPERATURE!
Energy Obese? An audit is the next step - go to BPI.org, or RESNET, and find an auditor near you.
-
10-12-2012, 11:33 PM #32
In my mind that would mean all planned house fixes should be known in advance, and calculated to deliver a figure for targeting the reduced capacity.
Yes, I'm going at it back-azzwards. Interesting to note, however, is that the house fixes to date have not rendered the HVAC incapable of creating a comfortable environment, year round. It is oversized, but we're not cool but clammy in hot, humid weather, nor chilly and nostril-cracking dry in cold weather. Being it's not a comfort issue, it's an efficiency issue. At some point the HVAC will be redone to fit the envelope mods. In the meantime I look forward to next summer to log and observe the difference our new cool roof makes on the cooling load."In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
- Homer Simpson
-
10-13-2012, 09:44 AM #33
-
10-13-2012, 09:44 AM #34
-
10-13-2012, 10:55 AM #35
Truth of the matter is it won't unfold as being uncomfortable. In my experience "undersizing" IMPROVES comfort, balance, AND energy bills. But it sounds like a good way to orient a ho perspective.
Sort of like the idea - no matter how many times I cut it, it's still to damn short.
No matter how much I improve the home, my equipment is still exhibiting problems associated with oversized equipment. You can always cut it shorter, cutting it longer is a challenge.Which makes more sense to you?
CONSERVATION - turning your thermostat back and being uncomfortable. Maybe saving 5-10%
ENERGY EFFICIENCY - leaving your thermostat where everyone is comfortable. Saving 30-70%
DO THE NUMBERS! Step on a HOMESCALE.
What is comfort? Well, it AIN'T just TEMPERATURE!
Energy Obese? An audit is the next step - go to BPI.org, or RESNET, and find an auditor near you.
-
10-15-2012, 12:05 PM #36
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 16
Actually there is a toggle switch on the board in my Goodman that lets me set it to run as 2-stage (high heat) all the time, no delays, no single stage only, so I could just run it that way. I don't believe there is any way to wire up this furnace to run with a two stage stat even if I wanted to.
It does not have a variable fan, one speed only, unless you move the jumper on the board to a different 'speed'
-
10-15-2012, 05:16 PM #37
Let it run as a 2 stage.


Reply With Quote
