Well boys and girls...

[netsalt]

Double post - ooops

[netsalt]

Romney/Ryan needs Ohio and it doesn't look promising. People gave the gov a pretty good spanking last year when his favorite law (SB5) got shot down at the voting booth, so the R's don't appear to have the upper hand any more.

[newoldtech]

Romney is gonna win. Better start getting used to it.

Oh yea? you wanna bet? I'll tell you what, if Romney wins Mcjo doesn't post for a year and if Obama wins Mcjo doesn't post for two years.

[Special-K]

Oh yea? you wanna bet? I'll tell you what, if Romney wins Mcjo doesn't post for a year and if Obama wins Mcjo doesn't post for two years.

You're on!!!!

[Special-K]

Romney/Ryan needs Ohio and it doesn't look promising. People gave the gov a pretty good spanking last year when his favorite law (SB5) got shot down at the voting booth, so the R's don't appear to have the upper hand any more.

The pollsters are using last election's demographic models. Simply put, Obama won't get that kind of turnout this time. Romney's troops are energized.

Romney will win and fairly easily. I predict over 300 electoral votes.

Having said...there will surely be at least one attempt at an "October Surprise" which could turn this whole thing upside down. So anything is possible.

[AStudent]

Romney/Ryan needs Ohio and it doesn't look promising. People gave the gov a pretty good spanking last year when his favorite law (SB5) got shot down at the voting booth, so the R's don't appear to have the upper hand any more.

Romney doesn't just need Ohio, he needs nearly all of the states that are left undecided...he has a 5 percent chance to win.

[mcjo tech]

Oh yea? you wanna bet? I'll tell you what, if Romney wins Mcjo doesn't post for a year and if Obama wins Mcjo doesn't post for two years.

2 for 1

Now you're talking.

[mcjo tech]

Not taking on your bet doesn't validate anything your saying. Sounds like you have a gambling problem.

You are right.

Not taking on my wager only really proves you all have no conviction for what you believe and no backbones.

As far as a gambling problem you could not be farther from the truth.

I hate to lose so only bet on a sure thing.

[mcjo tech]

The pollsters are using last election's demographic models. Simply put, Obama won't get that kind of turnout this time. Romney's troops are energized.

Romney will win and fairly easily. I predict over 300 electoral votes.

Having said...there will surely be at least one attempt at an "October Surprise" which could turn this whole thing upside down. So anything is possible.

You got those electorial votes turned around

Its Obama with the 300 plus and winning easily.

But feel free to keep kidding yourself.

[mcjo tech]

You're on!!!!

And since both of you are on the ARP Committee you probably wouldn't have difficulty making that happen.

I guess I had better mind my Ps and Qs.

[chaard]

You are right.

Not taking on my wager only really proves you all have no conviction for what you believe and no backbones.

As far as a gambling problem you could not be farther from the truth.

I hate to lose so only bet on a sure thing.

I'm not going to let someone else dictate when and where I can post. So no, not taking your bet. Not cause I believe Romney will lose but because the ballot box was rigged last time and maybe rigged again this time. Your Prez will go to any length to get elected.

[mcjo tech]

I'm not going to let someone else dictate when and where I can post. So no, not taking your bet. Not cause I believe Romney will lose but because the ballot box was rigged last time and maybe rigged again this time. Your Prez will go to any length to get elected.

Okay so your contention is that Romney will win only the ballots will be rigged so he does not win.

Man you guys will stop at nothing to convince yourselves.

The point is you would only not be able to post if you loose.

Mitty is going to win. Right?

So how would that be someone else dictating anything to you?

A simple "No Thanks" would have worked but I guess you felt like you needed to explain it away somehow.

I'll take this last response as a "NO" then.

That Okay with you?

[chaard]

Okay so your contention is that Romney will win only the ballots will be rigged so he does not win.

Man you guys will stop at nothing to convince yourselves.

The point is you would only not be able to post if you loose.

Mitty is going to win. Right?

So how would that be someone else dictating anything to you?

A simple "No Thanks" would have worked but I guess you felt like you needed to explain it away somehow.

I'll take this last response as a "NO" then.

That Okay with you?

Whatever.
Is that simple enough or did I use too many words for you?