You Know You Are A Conspiracy Theorist If...

[LibertyTree]

Sure Brian, there are conspiracies all the time but not 911 and I might add that would be an impossible conspiracy for Building 7 to fall down as a result of an inside job after the planes taking down the WTC. The odds of that happening timed after the destruction of the WTC is just to unbelievable to even bring it up in my mind.

Glen, what are you smoking? 3 skyscrapers fall down from alleged fire damage in one day, one of which wasn't even hit by a plane yet its more inconceivable that someone could coincide the demolition of 3 buildings? Its completely insane that intelligent people argue in favor of the official fairytale of 911. There's some weird psychology attached. Its an even bigger smoking gun than the OKC bombing.

Speaking of 911, here's a video for everyone to chew on. It perfectly explains the mentality of the mainstream "experts". They thought they could squash the thermite debate by having some expert a$$clowns say that thermite couldn't cut vertically through steel and if it could you would need some ungodly amount of it to bring a building down. This guy called buII**** with store bought chemicals, steel beams, a welder and a backyard. The "experts" conducted their own lame experiments by haphazardly packing some thermite around steel and saying "See, it didn't melt!" The guy in this video is using home made ghetto thermate, imagine what you could do with nano-thermite and a clever way to focus the energy...



WATCH THE WHOLE THING

Please, any of you who believe the official story, give a counter argument to all points in this video including but not limited to; thermite found in the dust, iron spheres, molten metal, and the fact that this guy successfully cut through steel with small amounts of thermetic material when stated impossible by mainstream "experts"

[LibertyTree]

The building fell for no reason. It’s not like seeing a ghost or a grainy picture of a UFO. It really fell…for no reason. That fact should spur curiosity as well as an investigation, but it didn’t. Why?

There are evil people in powerful places in this country but perpetrating 911 is hard for me to believe too. But a few things make me wonder. One is the fact that GWB knew of the first plane hitting the tower before he entered the classroom and was told of the second plane while he was in the class room, still doing nothing. The stupid look on his face in the classroom was very telling. It looked like no surprise to him. He should have responded as if his wife was hit by a Mach truck. But he didn’t.

Secondly, the Pennsylvania flight. It was probably shot out of the sky. Otherwise, how was debris found miles away if it crashed the way they claimed? It doesn’t add up.

Just because something is hard to believe is no reason to dismiss it entirely.

NORAD standing down and letting the planes hit their targets is one of the big tells. Also, they were running drills of hijacked planes flying into the twin towers the same morning while GWB adresses America saying that "we never could have imagined terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings" Gimme a break. There are so many facts that point to false flag its not even funny. You fail to realize that our government has been hijacked by mainly foreign enemies who could care less about killing thousands of Americans. Especially when, like clockwork, we're all on board with a huge war in the middle east whereas it would never fly otherwise.

[ga-hvac-tech]

The building fell for no reason. It’s not like seeing a ghost or a grainy picture of a UFO. It really fell…for no reason. That fact should spur curiosity as well as an investigation, but it didn’t. Why?

There are evil people in powerful places in this country but perpetrating 911 is hard for me to believe too. But a few things make me wonder. One is the fact that GWB knew of the first plane hitting the tower before he entered the classroom and was told of the second plane while he was in the class room, still doing nothing. The stupid look on his face in the classroom was very telling. It looked like no surprise to him. He should have responded as if his wife was hit by a Mach truck. But he didn’t.

Secondly, the Pennsylvania flight. It was probably shot out of the sky. Otherwise, how was debris found miles away if it crashed the way they claimed? It doesn’t add up.

Just because something is hard to believe is no reason to dismiss it entirely.

The conspiracy buffs in the investment community (most of them are called 'gold bugs')... think the reason 911 happened was to cover the tracks of a bunch of bankers and govts that have frauded both the American as well as the European people.

The glaring evidence 'someone' knew... is endless stuff that had been stored in vaults in the basements of the twin towers.... was for some reason moved out a couple of weeks prior (every last item of importance was removed and endless vacant space in HUGE vaults... the final moving the day before the planes hit... Wonder why???

Then there is the plane that hit the Pentagon... There were around half a dozen private businesses with video surveillance of the customers... camera angles that could have captured the flight on its way to the building... Within 10 minutes after the crash... the FBI collected ALL those videos... and they have NEVER been released... Again, why?

I can tell you this much: The truth will ONLY come out (whatever the truth is and if it ever does) AFTER anyone who could be held accountable is dead. Just the way the system works. Again... raises questions.

They say the person who has nothing to hide does not care what is said.... That alone should raise some questions.

GA's bottom line: Too many people are on the govt dole... and they do not bite the hand that feeds them.

[Brian GC]

We also went into Afghanistan without any evidence that Bin Laden did it. I remember that a few months after the invasion we found a video tape of Bin Laden laughing about it and held it up to the world to show the evidence of his involvement. Well, where was our evidence before that? And, who can believe Bin Laden taking credit for the attack…those guys always take credit for another guy’s bombings.

People do not want to consider what would make them sick to their stomach.

[AStudent]

Too many questionable things happened on 911.

[Brian GC]

Its an even bigger smoking gun than the OKC bombing.

That manure bomb was proven to not be powerful enough to do that damage. Furthermore, the debris was never examined. It was cordoned off and cleaned up in thirty days.

The ATF and Feds were back on good graces the very next day…what a coincidence.

[AStudent]

Glen, what are you smoking? 3 skyscrapers fall down from alleged fire damage in one day, one of which wasn't even hit by a plane yet its more inconceivable that someone could coincide the demolition of 3 buildings? Its completely insane that intelligent people argue in favor of the official fairytale of 911. There's some weird psychology attached. Its an even bigger smoking gun than the OKC bombing.

Speaking of 911, here's a video for everyone to chew on. It perfectly explains the mentality of the mainstream "experts". They thought they could squash the thermite debate by having some expert a$$clowns say that thermite couldn't cut vertically through steel and if it could you would need some ungodly amount of it to bring a building down. This guy called buII**** with store bought chemicals, steel beams, a welder and a backyard. The "experts" conducted their own lame experiments by haphazardly packing some thermite around steel and saying "See, it didn't melt!" The guy in this video is using home made ghetto thermate, imagine what you could do with nano-thermite and a clever way to focus the energy...



WATCH THE WHOLE THING

Please, any of you who believe the official story, give a counter argument to all points in this video including but not limited to; thermite found in the dust, iron spheres, molten metal, and the fact that this guy successfully cut through steel with small amounts of thermetic material when stated impossible by mainstream "experts"

Buildings don't fall straight down, collapsing floor by floor unless the supports were taken out, eventually the falling portion of the building would have lost momentum, causing a slower fall...not a free fall.

[scrogdog]

Buildings most certainly DO fall straight down, as they are about 95% air, and any claim to the contrary must show how sideways inertia was initiated.

As always, the explanation is there. Google the science of progressive collapse.

And what? Building 7 was undamaged? LMAO! Ok, if you only look at pics from one angle. Others show much of the building gouged out like a giant hand had come in to scoop it out.

I've debated this many times, shown the links, etc. So far, NO ONE has apparently even read about progressive collapse.

It's all readily available on the internet. I really don't feel like wasting my time, yet again, on this poorly laid out "intellectual inquiry".

Conspiracy theorists also, apparently, hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil. A more pathetically and apparently INTENTIONALLY ignorant crowd cannot be found on this planet.

You can always find the links in one of the older topics on this if you are lazy (still).

As for the trade center itself, there is no other way it could have collapsed (as shown in a study performed by The Lord Professor of Materials Science at MIT). The joists that held the floors were only meant to hold the weight of one floor. Once another floor crashed down on it, the weight was obviously much more. Thus a "progressive" collapse. The laws of phyisics, ie inertia, dictate that it should fall EXACTLY as it did. There was no "force" to begin an off center movement of the building.

Once again, the "science minds" of ARP reign supreme.

[Six]

Wow, people still think those buildings came down with exosives ?

And that building 7 was "undamaged " ??

They're chosing to ignore the photos that show the obvious damage to building 7 from the attack and NORAD ignoring the planes ??

Seriously ?

[OldSchoolMech]

So what was those flashes before the plane made contact with the towers?

Why was thier something on the bottom of the plane that hit the second tower?

America faked going to the moon. Why not fake an attack on itself to start a war that they want?

The towers where bombed in 93 but didn't go down they knew they where gonna be attacked again

The pentagon is the most high security building on the planet with the most CCTV camera of any other building but yet none of them show a plane or plane parts after the crash.

Remember bush was in power during 911

[royc]

[Brian GC]

The pentagon is the most high security building on the planet with the most CCTV camera of any other building but yet none of them show a plane or plane parts after the crash.

We know all the CCTV footage was confiscated and never shown to the public for some reason but where are the people on the ground that should have witnessed a huge plane flying so low on approach to the pentagon? Where are those witnesses? I’ve never seen one speak about it. How can a plane fly into the Pentagon and not be seen just beforehand.

[coolwhip]

That was an interesting video Liberty!

IMO, there is no doubt in my mind that these buildings were sabotaged.



Those that believe in the official government story are the same people (for the most part) that believe that the assault in Waco on the Mt. Carmel center was justifed.