09-04-2012, 12:47 AM
Typically hypocritic Democrats claiming there is no such thing as voter fraud are quick to cry "voter fraud" when they are not winning an election;
MILWAUKEE, Wisc. As voters in Wisconsin decide today whether or not Governor Scott Walker will stay in office, Democrats say they're bracing for voter fraud a perennial election complaint, but one that could cause real drama today in a race that's one of the most bitter in recent memory.
So, to Democrats, voter fraud only exists when they are most likely going lose or have lost an election, but voter fraud does not exist when Democrats can use the access to voter fraud to pad the votes. Talk about typical two faced hypocrites.
Government is a disease...
...masquerading as its own cure
Ecclesiastes 10:2 NIV
09-04-2012, 12:59 AM
I don't think its as cut and dry as that. Look at it like the legal system. Just because its designed so 100 guilty men go free before one innocent man is sent to prison doesn't mean that we want guilty men to go free. Its just which should take precedence.
Originally Posted by RoBoTeq
I haven't made my mind up on the voter ID issue because I can't decide what should take precedence. But then again I'm not a Democrat or Republican so I don't have to think the way the party does.
An engineer designs what he would never work on.
A technician works on what he would never design.
09-04-2012, 02:22 AM
That makes sense, but think of all the hundreds of thousands if not millions of illegal Mexicans that can legally get current valid ID (driver's license) and also get registered to vote. By having them show "current valid ID" isn't going to prevent potentially millions of cases of voter fraud--is it? And, in case anybody doesn't know it, illegal Mexicans (or any other illegals for that matter) are not legally permitted to vote in the United States of America--right?
Originally Posted by Hugh B
09-04-2012, 02:32 AM
millions of illegal Mexicans get a valid DL and they get registered to vote at the same time or they get registered later. They show valid and current ID when voting, but their vote was illegal. This is the real voter fraud problem, but republicans are too big awh cowards to talk about it. So, it makes requiring "current valid ID" to vote seem trivial by comparison.
Originally Posted by syndicated
09-04-2012, 08:57 AM
So I guess he doesn't vote then or just mail-in votes?
Originally Posted by AStudent
Honeslty, if you have pride in our nation, why wouldn't you be in favor of voter ID? I see some of the points about the eldery and disabled, but with the free voter buses run by both sides I can't imagine they couldn't get their ID.
Last edited by ControlsInMT; 09-04-2012 at 09:22 AM.
Don't worry zombies are looking for brains, you're safe...
09-04-2012, 09:33 AM
Yeah or he can just vote absantee nd save the folks at the voting place from cleaning up after him or DStudent driving him to vote and the world wouldn't end if he didn't vote. Thank you very much
Originally Posted by ControlsInMT
09-04-2012, 10:08 AM
It is not a problem for him to vote because he lives across the street from a church that holds voter polls...but it is becoming
more and more difficult to get his legal documents because he has to Wait in line all day and someone has to be with him.
09-04-2012, 10:31 AM
So you are saying a WWII veteran's vote does not count?
Originally Posted by glennac
09-04-2012, 10:46 AM
Sure and maybe u can set it up for him to vote from the grave absentee of course with you being his saragate like a good Democrat lol. Thank you, thank you very much
09-04-2012, 11:06 AM
This shouldn't even be an issue! Of course one should show their ID in order to cast a vote. There is no rational argument that can be raised against it. Those that would oppose voter ID are irrational people with something to hide...plain and simple.
09-04-2012, 11:22 AM
Sure...except that an ID is not going to stop any fraud.
Originally Posted by coolwhip
We need something more reliable than a person sitting behind a desk,at the DMV.
If you are going to do something do it right. I would agree more with this law if it didn't have to be an up to date ID...which only makes people that don't need an ID obtain one....and no I'm not talking about illegals.
09-04-2012, 11:26 AM
Hey Glenn, Hey Doodle......
YOU SHALL REAP WHAT YOU HAVE _______ SOWN
09-04-2012, 11:27 AM
A student, A step in the right direction is still a step in the right direction.
Anybody person breathing oxygen should have a valid ID....no excuses.
If they don't, then they are hiding something or mentally disturbed.
If not a drivers license, then a valid state ID card. My son is 11 years old and has an ID card.