Results 53 to 65 of 125
Thread: combustion analyser
09-12-2012, 04:20 PM #53No return.
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- NW burbs of Detroit
Looks like we got a Jedi Duel over com analyzers.
Both these guys are masters at their craft. Let's see if there is a definitive first place finisher.
09-12-2012, 10:19 PM #54
09-12-2012, 10:23 PM #55
09-12-2012, 10:36 PM #56
09-12-2012, 11:15 PM #57
yup....DAMN i can tell you about all those things too
09-13-2012, 01:35 AM #58
there was a reference to CO(O) in the 3 bar graph section, but it was CO in the trend graph.
which is the one that is more important, that is to say the below 100PPM in flue is acceptable?
CO(O) is reference to your outside or start up air location, 20.9%.
CO is the flue gas measurement- total CO produced, correct?If Guns Kill People, Do Pencils Misspell Words?
09-13-2012, 10:49 AM #59
09-13-2012, 10:58 AM #60captain CO
09-14-2012, 11:35 PM #61
Insite is allright, have both the 327 and insite.It's Hammer Time!
09-15-2012, 12:39 PM #62Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
Obviously, you have to consider that the Intech was influenced by prompt NOx at light off because it does not have a NOx filter (optional accessory). The Testo 310 and the Insight plus both have NOx filters and read almost exactly the same, and saw about the same peak CO. They are all three good analyzers. The fixed probe on the Testo is not a big deal due to the short gas path. It clears out quickly. The 310 also has a 4000 ppm sensor.JLB- Co Owner TruTech Tools Inc.
09-15-2012, 07:58 PM #63
09-17-2012, 02:55 AM #64
I didn't even consider the Bacharach since I thought they had "older" technology than Testo. Worth the look before I put out the $$.
09-17-2012, 03:08 AM #65
Jim B. Thanks for the videos!