Results 144 to 148 of 148
Thread: SMAN or Testo?
-
02-21-2013, 08:18 PM #144
-
02-21-2013, 09:07 PM #145
They are inaccurate, and have lots of issues.
I have sent my 557s back twice in less than a year to be reset (?) adjusted (?) calibrated (?), (I am not sure because testo never tells me what they did). All I know is I am sure there will be a third time.
When on R 22,it seems to think the pressures are 450 on the high side, 180 on low.
Yes I have it set to r 22, yes I blow it each and every time I change refrigerant, which was only once.
Its been the worst tool I ever bought, and I am not impressed with testo's customer service. I don't think I am ever going to buy testo anything ever again.The opinions expressed by me are not that of my employer.

-
02-21-2013, 09:21 PM #146
-
02-21-2013, 09:43 PM #147
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- North GA
- Posts
- 17,282
While I am a DC fan (never tried a Testo digital gauge set)... I do own some other Testo products: 327 combustion analyzer, 410, 510, 610, and a few others... they are all designed with thought and all work well.
I would not rule out Testo just because their digital manifold does not work right...GA-HVAC-Tech
Galatians 2:20-21; Colossians 1: 21-22 & 26-27; 3:1-4; Romans Ch's 5-6-7-8
2 Chronicles 7:14
Quality work at a fair price with excellent customer service.
-
02-22-2013, 11:16 AM #148
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 946
I have a 557 And sent it in. My bad. I did not fully rely on the manual. But the kind folks thru Mr. John Bickers gave me a free calibration check and firware up date.
No body can convince Testo ans FP gauges are not worth the investment. And if you have trouble with customer service...just a suggestion..."Youu catch more flies with honey than vinegar".



Do yourself a favor and rip the velcro off and just use a reusable zip tie to mount them 
Reply With Quote