Results 27 to 39 of 51
-
08-16-2012, 08:22 PM #27
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 675
It's a chiller made by Mitsubishi. The MHI stands for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
@flange I would not consider Turbocor compressors in a desert environment. I think they would not spend much time in their sweet spot and quite frankly the numbers I have seen tell me they suck at full load conditions. There are many very large central plants in Dubai many of which are district cooling facilities.
-
08-16-2012, 08:25 PM #28
-
08-16-2012, 08:46 PM #29
-
08-16-2012, 08:50 PM #30
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- A land down under
- Posts
- 285
Dubai has a design wet bulb of 89 degrees so agree the Turbocor performance would suck, but agree with Flange, given the lack of available wet bulb relief, worth investigating a VSD screw option.
For information on the Mutsuibishi Centrifugal http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/products/cat...l_chiller.htmlLast edited by Screwit; 08-16-2012 at 08:51 PM. Reason: Can't spell
Necessity is the mother of invention
-
08-16-2012, 08:52 PM #31
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 7,253
Didnt know it was that high. Yup, I would be all over me some screws, copeland, bristol, whatever they are called these days. I like those pumps.
-
08-16-2012, 09:18 PM #32
I'll take tube-brushing over coil-cleaning any day!
Truth is still truth, even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie, even if everyone believes it.
"It's called the american dream because you have to be asleep to believe it" -George Carlin
"A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves" -Edward R. Murrow
"I have problems just like you. One time, my dancing horse almost fell into my car elevator" -Mitt Romney
Buy american made goods & support locally owned businesses!
-
08-16-2012, 10:08 PM #33
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 7,253
obviosuly that is preferred for ease of maintenance, however, thinking slightly outside of the proverbial box, there are reasons why my plan might make some sense. first, it offers a quicker payback than a central plant. second, it doesnt generally require any more footprint or a dedicated mechanical room inside a building, which brings on a whole new set of problems such as refirgerant monitoring, ventilaltion, etc.. it is better than an air cooled solution, and can be designed to run very close to or better than total plant kw for a central plant, depending upon the style of centrifigual chosen.
-
08-16-2012, 10:10 PM #34
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 7,253
not to mention here in the states, it is a different type of leverage on the building, potentially creating tax saving opportunity over central plant.
-
08-18-2012, 05:03 PM #35
Yes, Yes it do suck. Don't recommend it for anyone. The 2nd. to last time I used rods was to get a whole bunch of fill from a tower out of a 1,500 ton absorber bundle. Suck doesn't even start to describe what kind of work that was.
...RonRoof Rat
-
08-18-2012, 09:35 PM #36
One more thing I'm not sure I saw mentioned? How greatly do the loads vary? Centrifugals often have minim capacities around 30-50% load. Screws can run down to 10-15% RLA in many cases. I felt that in many cases, centrifugals were best installed in pairs, on a system with a minimum load, or used as base load chillers together with a screw machine.
-
08-19-2012, 12:02 AM #37
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 675
Centrifugals are capable of turning down to 10% load and if equipped with VSD do so quite nicely. Even w/o VSD they can certainly turn down well below 30%. Can't imagine where you are receiving your information.
Originally Posted by motoguy128
-
08-19-2012, 07:55 AM #38
-
08-19-2012, 09:53 AM #39
Sorry, I'm probably confusing our air cooled unit with 3 compressors that can run down to 10-12% RLA, but that would still be 30% on one compressor.
I still remember from training I had on Trane centrifugals and rotary that the rotary would go quite a bit lower. Centrifugals seem more "sensitive" and we walked into one out our chillers rooms and it was getting noisy and RLA was only 60% without any apparent issues. But these are lower temp machines. IN another area, a pair of similar centrfugals were running happily at 48-50%. Who knows, maybe the IGV's need looking at on that one. The approach might have been starting to creep up a little too.
I guess from my limited experience with Trane units, you can run the screws lower loads than the seemly more sensitive centrifugals that find themselves near the edge of surging at times.
I thought it was something to factor in. A mutili compressor RTAA will defnitely run a much wider range of loads. SO in this case his 456 ton nominal system with two RTAA's could probably run down to almost 5-8% system capacity. A single centrifugal won't even come close and would need a large storage tank to prevent short cycles whe hte building is under low load, at night, during low occupancy periods.



Reply With Quote
