Results 14 to 25 of 25
Thread: Testo gauges.
-
08-16-2012, 11:57 AM #14
Hi, Ice.
Looking at the Testo 557 datasheet, it rates vacuum accuracy as +/- 1% FS (Full Scale) +/- 1 digit (at 22C).
This is a helluva way to rate a micron gauge! I don't know what they consider as "full scale", but, generally, when working with vacuum, I would consider FS to be 760,000 microns. Therefore, 1% FS would be 7,600 microns! In addition, 1 digit, represents 500 microns, as you have indicated.
From my vantage point, then, a reading of +/- 8,100 microns (at any vacuum level and at 22C) would be within factory spec. And no specs are given outside of the 22C temperature point. TIFWIW!
Full disclosure for those who don't know: I am the inventer, designer, and manufacturer of the AccuTools BluVac & BluVac LTE gauges.
Edit: Upon further reading of the datasheet, the vacuum range is 0 to 1 bar. So, one bar, or 750,064 microns, should be "full scale".
-
08-16-2012, 10:35 PM #15
Professional Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 289
what is the accuracy of the bluvac?
-
08-17-2012, 01:27 AM #16
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 49
I'm getting a Testo anyway. Just deciding on which vacuum gauge.
The fieldpiece look good value at $126.
-
08-17-2012, 08:17 AM #17
-
08-17-2012, 08:41 AM #18
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 49
-
08-17-2012, 10:13 AM #19
-
08-17-2012, 09:35 PM #20
Professional Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 289
So if we are sitting at 1000 microns on the Bluvac
It would be in the 1045 micron to 945 micron range?
-
08-17-2012, 11:56 PM #21
Regular Guest
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 49
It would be good eddie if anybody that uses the 557/570 along with a stand alone vac-gauge could contribute.
Your statement may be tongue in cheek, but that is exactlty what Testo's spec sheet says.
For HVAC it makes me wonder if this feature is "Showing us what we could have won".
-
08-18-2012, 12:33 AM #22
Professional Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 289
No tongue in cheek intended. I have been tricked in the past with accuracy,scale,resolution and count on meters before.
**I should have wrote 1055microns not 1045microns
-
08-18-2012, 09:51 AM #23
-
08-18-2012, 10:16 AM #24
Professional Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 289
Thank you.
-
08-18-2012, 11:18 AM #25



Reply With Quote
