Originally Posted by Six
Yea I know he seemingly burned the citizens of the country that respect the Constitution.
The discussion to what Roberts actual intentions were is all academic. Its worth the effort to try to at least apply some objective reasoning as to why he did it.
Its hard to believe he turned on his ideology at the time when this Country needed an objective assesment of the Constitution the most.
Especially after the Citizens United.
If he did this to preserve the integrity if the court as nonpolitical. To prove that he can intrept the constitution without applying a political slant then he's worthless.