[QUOTE=geerair;13288621]Which position, it changed each time you responded because you were countered. You say position, which one? I don't see where any of your positions were confirmed.Sorry, all I know is that Forbes confirmed my position.
That Forbes, yes, and as I stated earler, pretty good article, I enjoyed it and found facts which could be interpreted as for and against R's or conservatives.You know, the conservative Forbes, the free market Forbes, the Forbes that is headed by a former candidate for the Repubublican presidential nomination.
Good source and it was objective, and as you normally do, moving the position of the argument, my call was upon your biased viewpoint as not being objective, not the source/article.I didn't depend on a left-wing, dope-smoking hippie source.
That is orders of magnitude of objectivity.
But you dodging the facts (this time of my claim) you stay consistent with your past behavior. Might be slippery and slimy but it's at least consistent, gotta at least say that.