Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
05-24-2012, 02:14 PM #1
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 106
Gooseneck + Exhaust fan = Exhaustneck or Goosefan?
Nice, eh?
-
05-24-2012, 03:37 PM #2
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Woodbridge Twp, NJ
- Posts
- 1,201
The gooseneck has a pimple...pop it!
Every customer you take for granted today will be someone else's tomorrow.
-
05-24-2012, 03:56 PM #3
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Afton, VA / Khorat, Thailand
- Posts
- 2,453
Looks like a hood scoop on a Yugo...
-
05-24-2012, 10:04 PM #4
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Mt airy N.C.
- Posts
- 44
at least they did a good job putting that in lol
-
05-26-2012, 01:27 PM #5
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Jurupa Valley, CA
- Posts
- 1,112
Was the gooseneck at least blocked off?
-
05-29-2012, 07:50 PM #6
Professional Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- south jersey
- Posts
- 787
Same question. Good idea for a short time fix.
Originally Posted by CraziFuzzy
You need to put the phone down and get back to work!
-
05-30-2012, 12:46 PM #7
Professional Member*
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 106
Not sure. I wasn't on the survey, a colleague took the picture. We were only concerned about moving flues out of the way of some planned higher work. This was interesting but out of my scope.
From a water infiltration and duct sealing perspective, it's probably cheaper and better than cutting the duct assuming the existing roof penetration works well. It's just ugly as hell and not elegant at all. Also the electrical portion of the work looks wonky as well.
Reply With Quote
