+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: possible conversion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    106
    Post Likes

    possible conversion

    Ya got to love the enviro's. So I have a building with a big national chain that has two trane rtwa that are r-22 (11yrs old), so for the company to get the green leaf status the units will need to be changed to 134 or be replaced. the question is, can those units be converted or do I get to replace them with a newer version.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,759
    Post Likes
    You get to replace them.
    UA LU189

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Hot South
    Posts
    2,413
    Post Likes
    They can't be converted to 134A.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Prattville, Alabama
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Likes
    Is it still Trane's policy to not convert any Trane R22 equipment?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SE Iowa
    Posts
    5,577
    Post Likes
    Wow, only 11 years old too. Sell those puppies on the used market. Might fetch enough to cover installation costs at least.

    Hey, what size are they? I assume pretty large. Any chance they are 100-200 Tons?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    A land down under
    Posts
    361
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by R123 View Post
    They can't be converted to 134A.
    Nothing is impossible, usually it is a question of the cost.

    In this case it is more the conversion is not supported by the factory and the approx 30% capacity loss associated with the conversion. If you can locate literature for ERTWA in the European market which operated under accelerated HCFC plase out of the Montreal Protocol you will understand why I say this (B20 IM 004E).

    ERTHA also was available on HCFC22/HFC 134a out of Epinal/Charmes but only HCFC 22 out of Pueblo. There are specific procedures required for the conversion and efficiency/capacity losses which reduces chlorine emissions and direct GWP.

    Does indirect GWP come into considreation under the green leaf status?
    Necessity is the mother of invention

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    East of big city prices.
    Posts
    3,868
    Post Likes
    MO-99 aka R-438a. Maybe is that a flooded evaporator or DX?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    A land down under
    Posts
    361
    Post Likes
    The RTWA evaporator is DX, next issue affecting refrigerant conversions as the RTWA microprocessor measures refrigerant temperatures and converts to saturated temperatures for functional control. So the new refrigerant properties need to be selected in the configuration.
    Necessity is the mother of invention

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    106
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    the machines are 90 ton. and yes indirect GWP comes into consideration under the green leaf status. I will do some research on the web and see what I can find. If anybody has some specifics that would be great.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    East of big city prices.
    Posts
    3,868
    Post Likes
    Quote Originally Posted by nique View Post
    the machines are 90 ton. and yes indirect GWP comes into consideration under the green leaf status. I will do some research on the web and see what I can find. If anybody has some specifics that would be great.
    Well I looked on the web and all of the R-22 replacements seem to have a larger GWP than R-22.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    106
    Post Likes
    Thread Starter
    ya thats about what i found, thanks for looking.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    montreal/canada
    Posts
    98
    Post Likes
    What voltage are the rtwa and are they in good shape and last question are they for sale

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    4,456
    Post Likes
    What's wrong with 407c?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,762
    Post Likes
    yep 407c saturation temps are close enough to wing it with electronics im sure
    Keep it simple to keep it cool!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Central US
    Posts
    593
    Post Likes
    Right on 407c!!!!!!!!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    A land down under
    Posts
    361
    Post Likes
    I would have serious concerns "winging it" with R407c considering the glide when using a DX chiller vessel working off microprocesser staturated pressure/temperature properties of another refrigerant for the chillers safty protection.

    I guess you could fit an external low pressure switch for protection but the chillers reliable operation would be compromised.
    Necessity is the mother of invention

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    19,137
    Post Likes
    I've seen R407c and R22 use the same thermal expansion valves in some cases.

    I've seen it a lot on split systems.

    The bigger problem on the rtwa will be oil separation capacity. POE oils blend with refrigerant a lot better then mineral oils, which is why no traps are needed on high temp split systems using poe oils.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    austin
    Posts
    7
    Post Likes
    Carrier just sent out some info on converting 22 to 407' on a 100 ton machine it's like 17k to convert it. I haven't seen the labor involved . I'm shure if trane would let you convert it would be in the same relm , may want to replace the machines. Don't think it's worth the cost to convert. I don't remember what they said about capacity. Dozed off during that meeting

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •