Search:

Type: Posts; User: geerair

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.13 seconds.

  1. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Climatology is bad science...

    Climatology is bad science because...............Karl Marx.
  2. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Global Warming is bogus because.........Pompous...

    Global Warming is bogus because.........Pompous a$$hole progressive jerks.
  3. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    True The denier industry is eaten up with ...

    True

    The denier industry is eaten up with liars.
  4. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    No. What is stated is that temperature in one...

    No. What is stated is that temperature in one local area at one time frame does not constitute the global average temperature.

    Global Average Temperature is a measurement consisting of...
  5. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Why yes, you are correct and it is funded by the...

    Why yes, you are correct and it is funded by the fossil fuel industry, conservative organizations and wealthy conservative pinheads,

    Hell boy, nobody I know denies natural cycles and that the ...
  6. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Hey, a new denier brain fart...... ...

    Hey, a new denier brain fart......


    Climatology science is invalid because................the Supreme Court.
  7. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Read the science literature. there ismore than...

    Read the science literature. there ismore than enough evidence to convince even the most skeptical.


    Of course you and most others here find no proof of AGW because you get your science from Rush...
  8. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Yes, science is well aware that climate is...

    Yes, science is well aware that climate is variable and that there are natural cycles which affect climate. No controversy there.

    However, there is no natural cycle that can explain the recent...
  9. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Vaya Con Dios. Bye.

    Vaya Con Dios.

    Bye.[/QUOTE]
  10. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Ah, I see you have been listening to Limbaugh...

    Ah, I see you have been listening to Limbaugh again.

    What will you guys say when the earth's environment is fine in 20 years?[/QUOTE]
  11. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    So pontificates a demonstrably poor mind.

    So pontificates a demonstrably poor mind.
  12. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Fact-free paragraph. Never? I suppose given...

    Fact-free paragraph.

    Never? I suppose given yourchoice of reading material this must seem the case.




    Well, GW is still being used. However not as much as previously as no one who has...
  13. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Laughable. You read an op/ed in a business...

    Laughable.

    You read an op/ed in a business magazine written by a business reporter which concerned drug trials in the pharmaceutical industry.

    The article itself was a poor piece of reporting...
  14. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    And we continue with the science denier mode of...

    And we continue with the science denier mode of argument........

    AGW evidence is invalid because.................politics.
  15. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Grant money does not change reality. AGW would...

    Grant money does not change reality. AGW would continue on its not so merry way.

    A question for you.

    If government funding depends on reaching a desired conclusion, why are denier scientists...
  16. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    And then we have the mating call of pass-alongus...

    And then we have the mating call of pass-alongus e-mailicus.
  17. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Ah yes, the mating call of the denier, "Science...

    Ah yes, the mating call of the denier, "Science is bogus because..........the U.N."
  18. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Let's review. JP, Scrog and I discuss the...

    Let's review. JP, Scrog and I discuss the science.


    You conservative boys inject the politics.

    If you boys discuss the actual science of this issue at all it is in the form of op/eds and other...
  19. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    You have that backwards my friend. Gore,...

    You have that backwards my friend.

    Gore, Obama and the Dems. are informed by science.

    It is conservatives, Repubs. and other deniers who are informed by their ideology.
  20. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    With that predictable squall I rest my case.

    With that predictable squall I rest my case.
  21. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    It is obvious that given the evidence presented...

    It is obvious that given the evidence presented in this thread alone JP has made a well supported statement..
  22. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    That the AGW denier industry cannot argue the...

    That the AGW denier industry cannot argue the science of AGW and must instead argue politics has been known for years.
  23. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    This from a science illiterate who has no use for...

    This from a science illiterate who has no use for scientific evidence (or science itself for that matter) but throw a pathetically false pass-along e-mail in his inbox and he will drop to his knees...
  24. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    Ah yes, this would sum up the standard argument...

    Ah yes, this would sum up the standard argument against AGW science.

    Entirely political conspiracy and no science.
  25. Replies
    471
    Views
    9,773

    So you oppose AGW science because Bush has a more...

    So you oppose AGW science because Bush has a more efficient house than Gore?

    Your mature view is that because Bush has a more efficient house house than Gore AGW is an invalid theory?


    The...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4
Comfortech Show Promo Image

Related Forums

Plumbing Talks | Contractor Magazine
Forums | Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine
Comfortech365 Virtual Event