What libs NEVER do is address the facts:
1) Gun free zones (created by libs) are where these shootings happen
2) As soon as someone with a gun comes along... either the perp is shot or commits suicide... EITHER WAY the killing STOPS.
3) Areas with trained and armed guards do not have shootings.
Yet libs think the idea of armed guards is bad... Shows who is interested in solving the issue and who is interested in other agenda's.
Okay, what number of armed guards are required for each location? Lets get specific rather than throw out some idea that FEELS good. This is not hysteria just pointing out how stupid the premise is. We all want a solution but implementing it in the real world is another story.
I Know, I'm just being difficult, I actually want a solution that has a chance of improving the situation. Why not make it two dozen? Funny how the fact that armed guards were present at other mass killings and failed to prevent ANY carnage has not been addressed.
In another thread... I read a link to a story from Arizona....
Seems Sheriff Joe Arpiao has a volunteer Possee group... something like 3000 strong... who are gonna watch the schools. Now this group is not a new group... they have been watching malls for years... and guess what... NO violence at the malls... yet LOTS of arrests.
So yet again... Enforcement DOES work. No need to worry about guns... Rather catch the bad guys.
So we have a choice:
Gun control... which is proven to NOT work... or
Enforcement of law, which is proven DOES work.
Seems simple to me... that is... if solving the problem is the issue... Tell you what:
Lets see what the American public thinks? Ya think they want a solution that is proven to NOT work... or a solution that is proven DOES work.