r-22 mcquay chiller

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jayguy

agreed. go lower. below 500 microns is better but lower is best. lower and holding is an even better proof to a non leaking system. keep in mind that some things leak under a vacuum and some things leak under pressure so continue to leak check. since this is a unit that has had a lot of issues, you need to keep going until you checked everything several times and then several times again.

---

This is solid advice considering you have no idea how long the system was open for. Sometimes bigger machines take forever to get to 500 microns (days not hours). With that being said, if this isn't a critical unit, take your time and do everything correctly the way it needs to be done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ryan1088

This is solid advice considering you have no idea how long the system was open for. Sometimes bigger machines take forever to get to 500 microns (days not hours). With that being said, if this isn't a critical unit, take your time and do everything correctly the way it needs to be done.

---

I disagree with the premise a flooded chiller has to be evacuated to 500 microns. The OP said he got to 700 microns and after sitting overnight it was 730 microns. That is excellent in my book. Field evacuations of 5 mm was the acceptable standard for York flooded chillers. (That's 5000 microns, so 700 with a rise of 30 in twelve hours is more than acceptable by those standards.)

ONE OF YOU GUYS ASK FOR M/N WHR060B1 MCQUAY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KnewYork

I disagree with the premise a flooded chiller has to be evacuated to 500 microns. The OP said he got to 700 microns and after sitting overnight it was 730 microns. That is excellent in my book. Field evacuations of 5 mm was the acceptable standard for York flooded chillers. (That's 5000 microns, so 700 with a rise of 30 in twelve hours is more than acceptable by those standards.)

---

Agreed. When I was reading this thread I was thinking "well, what about the guys saying it has a leaking evaporator?" Well, even if I had repaired the evap, these numbers are still good. If you're (the OP) concerned about whether or not it is leaking, go ahead and drop the heads and test it. But a 30 micron rise overnight? I probably won't even see that on a mercury manometer, and I trust that over an electronic micron gauge.

about the leak in the evap. or cond. barrel I thought that I would have or get water in the compressor oil or multiple compressor failure. no different then an air to air system. if this has been going on for a year or two.

i know r22 for 30 lbs is $400.00

WHAT!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KnewYork

I disagree with the premise a flooded chiller has to be evacuated to 500 microns. The OP said he got to 700 microns and after sitting overnight it was 730 microns. That is excellent in my book. Field evacuations of 5 mm was the acceptable standard for York flooded chillers. (That's 5000 microns, so 700 with a rise of 30 in twelve hours is more than acceptable by those standards.)

---

In McQuay school/ staunton Va. many moons ago..... they at the factory only pull brand new chillers to 1000 microns before charging. 700 rising to 730 overnight is dang good. I'd like to see it lower just for the due diligence of making sure no miosture contaminants are in the machine but only rising 30 microns don't sound bad. I would have pressure tested with nitrogen before pulling a vaccum if "others" were telling you of an evaporator leak so you you don't inadvertantly pull water in but it sounds like you survived.

Hi guys, sorry about not getting back faster to you.I have had a lot going on. Yes I think I survived so far no problems with chiller. I was always told 500 microns is the magic number for a good vacuum in a refrigeration system. About the leak we will know in about 6 months. They say that is how long it will take to leak down. Good or bad I like the feed back. KEEP ME ON THE RIGHT TRACK PLEASE GUYS!! I'm a Diamond in the rough.

HI GUYS I'M BACK, THE MCQUAY CHILLER IS DOING FINE. NO COMPLAINTS. BUT NOW I'M LOOKING INTO A TRANE CHILLER M# RTWA125. I CHECK THIS CHILLER EVERY MORNING. I HAVE NOTICE THAT IT HAS A NON LATCHING ALARM (LOW CHILL WATER TEMPATURE). DO YOU GUYS THINK THAT IT LOST IT SETTINGS. THIS SYSTEM DOES HAVE A CONDENSER WATER BYPASS. THEY SENT SOMEBODY OVER THERE TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. I DO NOT KNOW WHO. BUT IT IS STILL DOING THE SAME THING. I RATHER ASK YOU GUYS THEN TO GET TREATED LIKE A MUSHROOM. IF YOU NEED MORE INFO JUST LET ME KNOW. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP.

Set point? Approach? H2o temps? Need more info

Yep, a full set of logs, including entering and leaving water pressures (taken with a single gauge) would help. Also, what is normal operation of this chiller? Does it run 24/7? Is it turned off every night? My initial concern would be chilled water flow, and the integrity of the chilled water flow switch. Also, first 4 digits/letters of serial number would help, so we can determine what control panel it has. Or you could just tell us which one is on it. I have seen historical diagnostics reported by owners as current, active diagnostics. Not saying that is the case here, just pointing out the difficulties of "remote" troubleshooting with a lack of info.

GOTCHA GUYS WORKING ON THE DATA LOG. IT MIGHT TAKE ME WHILE JUST BEAR WITH ME PLEASE. FLOW SWITCH HAS BEEN CHANGED, THIS CHILLER DOES TURN OFF BY OUTSIDE AIR & BMS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hvac1973

GOTCHA GUYS WORKING ON THE DATA LOG. IT MIGHT TAKE ME WHILE JUST BEAR WITH ME PLEASE. FLOW SWITCH HAS BEEN CHANGED, THIS CHILLER DOES TURN OFF BY OUTSIDE AIR & BMS.

---

Did your caps lock key get stuck? Please unstick it. It appears you are yelling at us. I, for one, would rather see no caps rather than all caps.:whistle: