I said that science AND logic have rules. Things to do not present something tangible to study cannot be tackled by science. But lots of intangibles can be the subject of philosophy and logic. There is one logic exercise (sorry, forget what the technique is called) where it follows that if A is true, and if B is true, then it MUST be the case that C is true.
Science alone cannot solve if, how and to what extent other parties were involved or aware of this attack. Science was not even invited to study the debris like they are with any other possible building attack. I bet they were invited to our recent embassy attack to determine where those bombs originated from.
See, this is exactly why I would not trust a truther with "evidence" any further than I could throw them. Clearly you have not honestly and impartially reviewed the MANY photos that CLEARLY show aircraft debris, both in and out of the pentagon.
As for photo evidence you have to be kidding. You are satisfied with that crappy, still photo of a blast that was released by the Pentagon when much, much more video is available and not being released. Heck, it doesn’t even show an identifiable plane. Why not release the real video from their rooftop or from nearby businesses that they confiscated? Next you are going to say the Warren Commission did an outstanding job.