17 cfm.....hmmmmmm
17 cfm.....hmmmmmm
Not too concerned right now. The condenser coil corrosion likely raises head pressure close to the "tripping" point, which is one reason I'm looking into replacement options; the other reason is energy cost.Quote:
Originally Posted by RoBoTeq
I believe the "tripping" is in remission for the time being, so long as I use the less restrictive filters. If it trips again and needs to be fixed, my home warranty will get a workout as it did when the TXV failed in Jan 2010 and when it stopped cooling in Jul 2012 due to the corroded, leaking accumulator. If they have to fix it again before I commit to a replacement, maybe they'll condemn the unit and give me at least a little money toward the replacement.
In the meantime, I do intend to ask one of this forum's pro's, recently added to the contractor map in my area, to come by and do PM (for a fee, of course) and give me an estimate on replacement.
I've emailed a forum pro that was just recently added to the contractor map in my area and, hopefully, he'll be able to help me determine ESP, among other things.Quote:
Originally Posted by tedkidd
Just for kicks, I logged on to the load calc demo that you posted a link for in another thread earlier today. Thanks for that link! I went through step by step and entered actual, accurate measurements, including ACH and duct leakage data from earlier testing done by a potential bidder, along with the upgraded ceiling insulation. I carefully deleted basement/crawl space data and entered the actual perimeter measurements for the foundation.
First pass computed a 5.25 ton requirement, which I knew was wrong. When I re-verified the data, I realized I'd failed to identify the % of my windows that I leave shaded (blinds drawn) during the daytime. Once that was computed and corrected, the recommendation was 3.57 ton. Cooling load was 32,149 Btuh sensible and 4,251 Btuh latent. This is right inline with both Manual J load calcs done by two potential bidders on my new equipment, neither of which are still in the picture.
This has me again leaning away from down-sizing to 3 ton, unless it's the iQ Drive. My gut now tells me to stick with a 3.5 ton single stage SEER 15 and never mind the bells and whistles of the more expensive equipment.
Glad you are getting esp, that will connect a lot. Maybe the 4t 2 stage will work.
Don't forget to true to actual energy consumption, and derate equipment efficiency for age, and derate further if static is high.
Well, finding someone to measure esp may not be so easy. I called the one contractor on the "contractor map" for my area. Since he's a one-man shop and "too small" to invest in all the extra equipment that's "not required" by code, PM includes the standard pressure measurements, voltage readings, sub-cooling and the like, but not esp.Quote:
Originally Posted by tedkidd
I don't see any provision for that in the online "Auditor" program, so how would I do that?Quote:
Originally Posted by tedkidd
Found the leak in the unfinished return cavity. The HVAC guy who "repaired" the duct leaks identified by the FPL blower door test would have had to "look up" to see it. It was probably easier to just put ductboard on the bottom and sides of the cavity and call it done, so he wouldn't have to twist his neck or lie on his back and "look up" to see this rather sizeable hole.Quote:
Originally Posted by energy star
Attachment 316201
I wonder if they'll come back and do it right if I complain to FPL about one of their PIC list contractors doing substandard work?
They dont have manometers??Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida Joy
http://meiersupply.com/TechSpeak/Tec...0%20Issue2.pdf
use the "sliders" - may look a little different on current version but it's a critical piece of what makes the software so useful.
Attachment 316211
And talking about Duct Leakage, this was in a crawl space that was significantly more connected to outside than inside...
Attachment 316221
Not a fun space
Attachment 316231
They said no. I wonder why not. It seems to me it would be required as part of the process of properly setting up a new air handler. I hope I don't sound too picky, but when I get his bid, I need to ask how he'll verify CFM settings without one. I think I know the answer though... "experience", and if need be, he'll "tweak" it.Quote:
Originally Posted by tedkidd
Perhaps this cost data is included with the full version, but it's not in the demo.Quote:
Originally Posted by tedkidd
TELL HIM WITHOUT A COMPLETE SET-UP, based on Your Vast Bill Paying Experience, that it would be appropriate to ' tweak' his invoice with a 30% self_ imposed D U C T DisCoUnT that was in your contract find fine print.Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida Joy
Experience Pays _
_____________ but just 'so much'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida Joy
So do all ya'll techs in this forum use a manometer during setup? Is my guy a hack if he doesn't? Or do you have another tool in your toolbox to verify ESP and setup the airflow on a new air handler?Quote:
Originally Posted by dan sw fl
I'm still learning how to pick that "special" pro that I want for my install.
I wouldnt say "hack" but it is definately a sign that he is not getting scientific with his installs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Florida Joy
There are some other ways to measure airflow but a mamometer is the basic way to do it. Other instruments 10x the cost.
Some of the owner's of companies don't want you to spend any extra time setting up the equipment, just want to get the check and get out the door, if the customer calls back then they go through the sequence of setting everything up properly. Kinda bass ackwards if you ask me but you can't blame a tech for being a hack if he's just doing what his boss says. All HVAC guys should have a manometer, how would they check gas pressure without one?
A little concerned now... this guy's the "owner" of a one man shop who said he has a tech who "helps" with installs.... when he shows up for work! We had a good long visit when he came out to get info for a Man J in preparation for his quote. He had a lot of good (I think) ideas regarding install options and tweaking ductwork, and he seemed really caring and knowledgeable. Nothing but A ratings on Angie's list, too. I expect his proposal soon and will ask again about manometer usage during the install.Quote:
Originally Posted by jtrammel
Can't seem to catch a break in finding that one totally comforting, technically capable, contractor.